Consensus Crash Testing: Exploring Ripple’s Decentralization Degree in Adversarial Environments

The inception of Bitcoin as a peer-to-peer payment system, and its underlying blockchain data-structure and protocol, has led to an increased interest in deploying scalable and reliable distributed-<i>ledger</i> systems that build on robust consensus protocols. A critical requirement of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Klitos Christodoulou, Elias Iosif, Antonios Inglezakis, Marinos Themistocleous
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Future Internet
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/12/3/53
_version_ 1818019553103314944
author Klitos Christodoulou
Elias Iosif
Antonios Inglezakis
Marinos Themistocleous
author_facet Klitos Christodoulou
Elias Iosif
Antonios Inglezakis
Marinos Themistocleous
author_sort Klitos Christodoulou
collection DOAJ
description The inception of Bitcoin as a peer-to-peer payment system, and its underlying blockchain data-structure and protocol, has led to an increased interest in deploying scalable and reliable distributed-<i>ledger</i> systems that build on robust consensus protocols. A critical requirement of such systems is to provide enough fault tolerance in the presence of adversarial attacks or network faults. This is essential to guarantee liveness when the network does not behave as expected and ensure that the underlying nodes agree on a unique order of transactions over a shared state. In comparison with traditional distributed systems, the deployment of a distributed-<i>ledger</i> system should take into account the hidden game theoretical aspects of such protocols, where actors are competing with each other in an environment which is likely to experience various well-motivated malicious and adversarial attacks. Firstly, this paper discusses the fundamental principles of existing consensus protocols in the context of both permissioned and permissionless distributed-<i>ledger</i> systems. The main contribution of this work deals with observations from experimenting with Ripple&#8217;s consensus protocol as it is embodied in the XRP Ledger. The main experimental finding suggests that, when a low percentage of malicious nodes is present, the centralization degree of the network can be significantly relaxed ensuring low convergence times. Those findings are of particular importance when engineering a consensus algorithm that would like to balance security with decentralization.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T07:52:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-64abecc89ea7491cb7240afd8e5f3bfa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-5903
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T07:52:44Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Future Internet
spelling doaj.art-64abecc89ea7491cb7240afd8e5f3bfa2022-12-22T02:05:08ZengMDPI AGFuture Internet1999-59032020-03-011235310.3390/fi12030053fi12030053Consensus Crash Testing: Exploring Ripple’s Decentralization Degree in Adversarial EnvironmentsKlitos Christodoulou0Elias Iosif1Antonios Inglezakis2Marinos Themistocleous3Institute For the Future, University of Nicosia, 2414 Engomi, CyprusInstitute For the Future, University of Nicosia, 2414 Engomi, CyprusInstitute For the Future, University of Nicosia, 2414 Engomi, CyprusInstitute For the Future, University of Nicosia, 2414 Engomi, CyprusThe inception of Bitcoin as a peer-to-peer payment system, and its underlying blockchain data-structure and protocol, has led to an increased interest in deploying scalable and reliable distributed-<i>ledger</i> systems that build on robust consensus protocols. A critical requirement of such systems is to provide enough fault tolerance in the presence of adversarial attacks or network faults. This is essential to guarantee liveness when the network does not behave as expected and ensure that the underlying nodes agree on a unique order of transactions over a shared state. In comparison with traditional distributed systems, the deployment of a distributed-<i>ledger</i> system should take into account the hidden game theoretical aspects of such protocols, where actors are competing with each other in an environment which is likely to experience various well-motivated malicious and adversarial attacks. Firstly, this paper discusses the fundamental principles of existing consensus protocols in the context of both permissioned and permissionless distributed-<i>ledger</i> systems. The main contribution of this work deals with observations from experimenting with Ripple&#8217;s consensus protocol as it is embodied in the XRP Ledger. The main experimental finding suggests that, when a low percentage of malicious nodes is present, the centralization degree of the network can be significantly relaxed ensuring low convergence times. Those findings are of particular importance when engineering a consensus algorithm that would like to balance security with decentralization.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/12/3/53rippleblockchaindistributed ledgersconsensusbyzantine-fault tolerance
spellingShingle Klitos Christodoulou
Elias Iosif
Antonios Inglezakis
Marinos Themistocleous
Consensus Crash Testing: Exploring Ripple’s Decentralization Degree in Adversarial Environments
Future Internet
ripple
blockchain
distributed ledgers
consensus
byzantine-fault tolerance
title Consensus Crash Testing: Exploring Ripple’s Decentralization Degree in Adversarial Environments
title_full Consensus Crash Testing: Exploring Ripple’s Decentralization Degree in Adversarial Environments
title_fullStr Consensus Crash Testing: Exploring Ripple’s Decentralization Degree in Adversarial Environments
title_full_unstemmed Consensus Crash Testing: Exploring Ripple’s Decentralization Degree in Adversarial Environments
title_short Consensus Crash Testing: Exploring Ripple’s Decentralization Degree in Adversarial Environments
title_sort consensus crash testing exploring ripple s decentralization degree in adversarial environments
topic ripple
blockchain
distributed ledgers
consensus
byzantine-fault tolerance
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/12/3/53
work_keys_str_mv AT klitoschristodoulou consensuscrashtestingexploringripplesdecentralizationdegreeinadversarialenvironments
AT eliasiosif consensuscrashtestingexploringripplesdecentralizationdegreeinadversarialenvironments
AT antoniosinglezakis consensuscrashtestingexploringripplesdecentralizationdegreeinadversarialenvironments
AT marinosthemistocleous consensuscrashtestingexploringripplesdecentralizationdegreeinadversarialenvironments