The effect of method of fertilizer application on sugar beet yield, yield quality and fertilization requirement in Finland

In 1982—1990, the Sugar Beet Research Centre conducted a total of 68 fertilizer placement trials. The present paper deals with 23 trials from five field experiment series. In the evaluation of the results, other experiments conducted at the Sugar Beet Research Centre have also been referred to. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyösti Raininko, Matti Erjala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 1991-04-01
Series:Agricultural and Food Science
Online Access:https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/72398
_version_ 1818038408124039168
author Kyösti Raininko
Matti Erjala
author_facet Kyösti Raininko
Matti Erjala
author_sort Kyösti Raininko
collection DOAJ
description In 1982—1990, the Sugar Beet Research Centre conducted a total of 68 fertilizer placement trials. The present paper deals with 23 trials from five field experiment series. In the evaluation of the results, other experiments conducted at the Sugar Beet Research Centre have also been referred to. The field trials were conducted on experimental farms of the Sugar Beet Research Centre and of sugar factories. The soil type of the experimental fields varied from compact clay to finesand. The soil pH was high (6.7 —7.4) and the nutrient status good. The fertilizer used was an Na-containing compound fertilizer (N 13 %, P 6 %, K 9 %, Na 6 % in 1982—1987; N 15 %, P 6 %, K 8 %, Na 5 % as from 1988). The fertilizer was applied with a fertilizer drill. A disk bill was used in 1982—1983; thereafter a thin spring tine bill was used. Placement of fertilizer 3—6 cm to the side and 3 cm below the seed increased the root yield of sugar beet by 5—6 %, on an average, as compared to broadcasting. The yield increase ranged from 0 to 24 %. The yield increase from fertilizer placement correlated negatively with the sugar beet yield level. The nutritional status and humus content of soil, and soil type did not affect the yield increase from fertilizer placement. The seed bed preparation one-pass power harrow or conventional method had no significant effect on the yield increase from fertilizer placement. Increasing the level of fertilizer reduced the yield increase from fertilizer placement in some of the trials. This was not always the case, however. Placement usually gave a slightly higher sugar content than did broadcasting. Placement reduced the potassium content of the beet slightly and increased the extractability of sugar. As compared to broadcasting, placement increased the recoverable sugar yield relatively slightly more than the root yield. Placement of the fertilizer 3 cm to the side (3 or 6 cm below the seed) yielded a better result than placement 9 cm to the side of the seed. The depth of placement did not affect the yield. In most trials, placement of the fertilizer reduced the plant population only slightly as compared to broadcasting. The harmful effect in these trials was not significant even with the smallest distance from the seed, i.e. 3 cm. In practice, placement too close was shown to inhibit or to retard germination of the beet. It is therefore recommended that the fertilizer be placed 5—6 cm to the side and 3—4 cm below the seed.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T07:42:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-64c0ff2e21ae44efa50abc92c1363f9c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1459-6067
1795-1895
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T07:42:16Z
publishDate 1991-04-01
publisher Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland
record_format Article
series Agricultural and Food Science
spelling doaj.art-64c0ff2e21ae44efa50abc92c1363f9c2022-12-22T01:57:17ZengScientific Agricultural Society of FinlandAgricultural and Food Science1459-60671795-18951991-04-01632The effect of method of fertilizer application on sugar beet yield, yield quality and fertilization requirement in FinlandKyösti Raininko0Matti Erjala1Sugar Beet Research Centre, SF-25170 Kotalato, FinlandSugar Beet Research Centre, SF-25170 Kotalato, FinlandIn 1982—1990, the Sugar Beet Research Centre conducted a total of 68 fertilizer placement trials. The present paper deals with 23 trials from five field experiment series. In the evaluation of the results, other experiments conducted at the Sugar Beet Research Centre have also been referred to. The field trials were conducted on experimental farms of the Sugar Beet Research Centre and of sugar factories. The soil type of the experimental fields varied from compact clay to finesand. The soil pH was high (6.7 —7.4) and the nutrient status good. The fertilizer used was an Na-containing compound fertilizer (N 13 %, P 6 %, K 9 %, Na 6 % in 1982—1987; N 15 %, P 6 %, K 8 %, Na 5 % as from 1988). The fertilizer was applied with a fertilizer drill. A disk bill was used in 1982—1983; thereafter a thin spring tine bill was used. Placement of fertilizer 3—6 cm to the side and 3 cm below the seed increased the root yield of sugar beet by 5—6 %, on an average, as compared to broadcasting. The yield increase ranged from 0 to 24 %. The yield increase from fertilizer placement correlated negatively with the sugar beet yield level. The nutritional status and humus content of soil, and soil type did not affect the yield increase from fertilizer placement. The seed bed preparation one-pass power harrow or conventional method had no significant effect on the yield increase from fertilizer placement. Increasing the level of fertilizer reduced the yield increase from fertilizer placement in some of the trials. This was not always the case, however. Placement usually gave a slightly higher sugar content than did broadcasting. Placement reduced the potassium content of the beet slightly and increased the extractability of sugar. As compared to broadcasting, placement increased the recoverable sugar yield relatively slightly more than the root yield. Placement of the fertilizer 3 cm to the side (3 or 6 cm below the seed) yielded a better result than placement 9 cm to the side of the seed. The depth of placement did not affect the yield. In most trials, placement of the fertilizer reduced the plant population only slightly as compared to broadcasting. The harmful effect in these trials was not significant even with the smallest distance from the seed, i.e. 3 cm. In practice, placement too close was shown to inhibit or to retard germination of the beet. It is therefore recommended that the fertilizer be placed 5—6 cm to the side and 3—4 cm below the seed.https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/72398
spellingShingle Kyösti Raininko
Matti Erjala
The effect of method of fertilizer application on sugar beet yield, yield quality and fertilization requirement in Finland
Agricultural and Food Science
title The effect of method of fertilizer application on sugar beet yield, yield quality and fertilization requirement in Finland
title_full The effect of method of fertilizer application on sugar beet yield, yield quality and fertilization requirement in Finland
title_fullStr The effect of method of fertilizer application on sugar beet yield, yield quality and fertilization requirement in Finland
title_full_unstemmed The effect of method of fertilizer application on sugar beet yield, yield quality and fertilization requirement in Finland
title_short The effect of method of fertilizer application on sugar beet yield, yield quality and fertilization requirement in Finland
title_sort effect of method of fertilizer application on sugar beet yield yield quality and fertilization requirement in finland
url https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/72398
work_keys_str_mv AT kyostiraininko theeffectofmethodoffertilizerapplicationonsugarbeetyieldyieldqualityandfertilizationrequirementinfinland
AT mattierjala theeffectofmethodoffertilizerapplicationonsugarbeetyieldyieldqualityandfertilizationrequirementinfinland
AT kyostiraininko effectofmethodoffertilizerapplicationonsugarbeetyieldyieldqualityandfertilizationrequirementinfinland
AT mattierjala effectofmethodoffertilizerapplicationonsugarbeetyieldyieldqualityandfertilizationrequirementinfinland