Thesis research in urology: what is good and what is bad?

Insufficient attention of clinicians to scientific research is one of the major concerns of medical education. To date, urological science is developing so rapidly that it is difficult for physicians to stay within the limits of modern technology. Urological science and clinical management should cl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. I. Kogan
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: State Budget Educational Institute of Higher Professional Education, Rostov State Medical University, Ministry Health of Russian Federation 2023-12-01
Series:Vestnik Urologii
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/786
_version_ 1797272076187336704
author M. I. Kogan
author_facet M. I. Kogan
author_sort M. I. Kogan
collection DOAJ
description Insufficient attention of clinicians to scientific research is one of the major concerns of medical education. To date, urological science is developing so rapidly that it is difficult for physicians to stay within the limits of modern technology. Urological science and clinical management should closely cooperate and share experience. In this regard, it seems useful to understand the problems of thesis research in urology. Of course, to understand not all the problems, but only a part of them, presented on the website of the High Certification Committee. Ten-year analysis (2013 – 2022) allows us to see trends and weaknesses, to form assumptions about the causes of processes and to see adjusting directions of unfavourable influencing factors on scientific research in urology.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:23:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-64cc361e570c483c84d92b4af0362f32
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2308-6424
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:23:14Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher State Budget Educational Institute of Higher Professional Education, Rostov State Medical University, Ministry Health of Russian Federation
record_format Article
series Vestnik Urologii
spelling doaj.art-64cc361e570c483c84d92b4af0362f322024-03-06T08:56:06ZrusState Budget Educational Institute of Higher Professional Education, Rostov State Medical University, Ministry Health of Russian FederationVestnik Urologii2308-64242023-12-011145910.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-4-5-9478Thesis research in urology: what is good and what is bad?M. I. Kogan0Rostov State Medical UniversityInsufficient attention of clinicians to scientific research is one of the major concerns of medical education. To date, urological science is developing so rapidly that it is difficult for physicians to stay within the limits of modern technology. Urological science and clinical management should closely cooperate and share experience. In this regard, it seems useful to understand the problems of thesis research in urology. Of course, to understand not all the problems, but only a part of them, presented on the website of the High Certification Committee. Ten-year analysis (2013 – 2022) allows us to see trends and weaknesses, to form assumptions about the causes of processes and to see adjusting directions of unfavourable influencing factors on scientific research in urology.https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/786urologythesis researchanalysis
spellingShingle M. I. Kogan
Thesis research in urology: what is good and what is bad?
Vestnik Urologii
urology
thesis research
analysis
title Thesis research in urology: what is good and what is bad?
title_full Thesis research in urology: what is good and what is bad?
title_fullStr Thesis research in urology: what is good and what is bad?
title_full_unstemmed Thesis research in urology: what is good and what is bad?
title_short Thesis research in urology: what is good and what is bad?
title_sort thesis research in urology what is good and what is bad
topic urology
thesis research
analysis
url https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/786
work_keys_str_mv AT mikogan thesisresearchinurologywhatisgoodandwhatisbad