Rectal swab screening assays of public health importance in molecular diagnostics: Sample adequacy control

Rectal swabs are routinely used by public health authorities to screen for multi-drug resistant enteric bacteria including vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Screening sensitivity can be influenced by the quality of the swabbing, whether perform...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sanja Glisovic, Shaun Eintracht, Yves Longtin, Matthew Oughton, Ivan Brukner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-03-01
Series:Journal of Infection and Public Health
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034117301831
_version_ 1811269077440659456
author Sanja Glisovic
Shaun Eintracht
Yves Longtin
Matthew Oughton
Ivan Brukner
author_facet Sanja Glisovic
Shaun Eintracht
Yves Longtin
Matthew Oughton
Ivan Brukner
author_sort Sanja Glisovic
collection DOAJ
description Rectal swabs are routinely used by public health authorities to screen for multi-drug resistant enteric bacteria including vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Screening sensitivity can be influenced by the quality of the swabbing, whether performed by the patient (self-swabbing) or a healthcare practitioner. One common exclusion criterion for rectal swabs is absence of “visible soiling” from fecal matter. In our institution, this criterion excludes almost 10% of rectal swabs received in the microbiology laboratory. Furthermore, over 30% of patients in whom rectal swabs are cancelled will not be re-screened within the next 48 h, resulting in delays in removing infection prevention measures. We describe two quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based assays, human RNAse P and eubacterial 16S rDNA, which might serve as suitable controls for sampling adequacy. However, lower amounts of amplifiable human DNA make the 16s rDNA assay a better candidate for sample adequacy control. Keywords: PCR screening, Self-swabbing, Antibiotic resistance, Cost effective protocol, Public health screening
first_indexed 2024-04-12T21:35:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-64f0742a6b644b6d8ddbd5ee36595098
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1876-0341
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T21:35:37Z
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Infection and Public Health
spelling doaj.art-64f0742a6b644b6d8ddbd5ee365950982022-12-22T03:15:55ZengElsevierJournal of Infection and Public Health1876-03412018-03-01112234237Rectal swab screening assays of public health importance in molecular diagnostics: Sample adequacy controlSanja Glisovic0Shaun Eintracht1Yves Longtin2Matthew Oughton3Ivan Brukner4SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaMedical Faculty, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaMedical Faculty, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaMedical Faculty, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaMedical Faculty, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Corresponding author at: SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Rectal swabs are routinely used by public health authorities to screen for multi-drug resistant enteric bacteria including vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Screening sensitivity can be influenced by the quality of the swabbing, whether performed by the patient (self-swabbing) or a healthcare practitioner. One common exclusion criterion for rectal swabs is absence of “visible soiling” from fecal matter. In our institution, this criterion excludes almost 10% of rectal swabs received in the microbiology laboratory. Furthermore, over 30% of patients in whom rectal swabs are cancelled will not be re-screened within the next 48 h, resulting in delays in removing infection prevention measures. We describe two quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based assays, human RNAse P and eubacterial 16S rDNA, which might serve as suitable controls for sampling adequacy. However, lower amounts of amplifiable human DNA make the 16s rDNA assay a better candidate for sample adequacy control. Keywords: PCR screening, Self-swabbing, Antibiotic resistance, Cost effective protocol, Public health screeninghttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034117301831
spellingShingle Sanja Glisovic
Shaun Eintracht
Yves Longtin
Matthew Oughton
Ivan Brukner
Rectal swab screening assays of public health importance in molecular diagnostics: Sample adequacy control
Journal of Infection and Public Health
title Rectal swab screening assays of public health importance in molecular diagnostics: Sample adequacy control
title_full Rectal swab screening assays of public health importance in molecular diagnostics: Sample adequacy control
title_fullStr Rectal swab screening assays of public health importance in molecular diagnostics: Sample adequacy control
title_full_unstemmed Rectal swab screening assays of public health importance in molecular diagnostics: Sample adequacy control
title_short Rectal swab screening assays of public health importance in molecular diagnostics: Sample adequacy control
title_sort rectal swab screening assays of public health importance in molecular diagnostics sample adequacy control
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034117301831
work_keys_str_mv AT sanjaglisovic rectalswabscreeningassaysofpublichealthimportanceinmoleculardiagnosticssampleadequacycontrol
AT shauneintracht rectalswabscreeningassaysofpublichealthimportanceinmoleculardiagnosticssampleadequacycontrol
AT yveslongtin rectalswabscreeningassaysofpublichealthimportanceinmoleculardiagnosticssampleadequacycontrol
AT matthewoughton rectalswabscreeningassaysofpublichealthimportanceinmoleculardiagnosticssampleadequacycontrol
AT ivanbrukner rectalswabscreeningassaysofpublichealthimportanceinmoleculardiagnosticssampleadequacycontrol