Personal versus impersonal passive in Latin infinitival clauses: Some diachronic considerations

This paper deals with the historical origins of the Classical Latin alternation between the personal passive NcI and the impersonal passive + AcI constructions. Starting from the observation by Maraldi (1983) that this alternation is not found prior to Cicero in the first century BC, the claim is th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sean Gleason
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Presses universitaires du Midi 2016-11-01
Series:Pallas
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/pallas/3751
_version_ 1828037744121610240
author Sean Gleason
author_facet Sean Gleason
author_sort Sean Gleason
collection DOAJ
description This paper deals with the historical origins of the Classical Latin alternation between the personal passive NcI and the impersonal passive + AcI constructions. Starting from the observation by Maraldi (1983) that this alternation is not found prior to Cicero in the first century BC, the claim is that a combination of external and internal linguistic factors lie behind its emergence in the language. The external factor is the existence of an identical alternation in Ancient Greek, while the internal factor is the development of the passive as an independent category in Latin. The interplay between these two factors points to viewing the impersonal passive + AcI as a partial Graecism.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T16:15:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-64f5f0ed073c4a49bd9c3e08e14879f9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0031-0387
2272-7639
language fra
last_indexed 2024-04-10T16:15:54Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher Presses universitaires du Midi
record_format Article
series Pallas
spelling doaj.art-64f5f0ed073c4a49bd9c3e08e14879f92023-02-09T16:31:54ZfraPresses universitaires du MidiPallas0031-03872272-76392016-11-0110226727510.4000/pallas.3751Personal versus impersonal passive in Latin infinitival clauses: Some diachronic considerationsSean GleasonThis paper deals with the historical origins of the Classical Latin alternation between the personal passive NcI and the impersonal passive + AcI constructions. Starting from the observation by Maraldi (1983) that this alternation is not found prior to Cicero in the first century BC, the claim is that a combination of external and internal linguistic factors lie behind its emergence in the language. The external factor is the existence of an identical alternation in Ancient Greek, while the internal factor is the development of the passive as an independent category in Latin. The interplay between these two factors points to viewing the impersonal passive + AcI as a partial Graecism.http://journals.openedition.org/pallas/3751infinitiveaccusativus cum infinitivonominativus cum infinitivodiachronygreek
spellingShingle Sean Gleason
Personal versus impersonal passive in Latin infinitival clauses: Some diachronic considerations
Pallas
infinitive
accusativus cum infinitivo
nominativus cum infinitivo
diachrony
greek
title Personal versus impersonal passive in Latin infinitival clauses: Some diachronic considerations
title_full Personal versus impersonal passive in Latin infinitival clauses: Some diachronic considerations
title_fullStr Personal versus impersonal passive in Latin infinitival clauses: Some diachronic considerations
title_full_unstemmed Personal versus impersonal passive in Latin infinitival clauses: Some diachronic considerations
title_short Personal versus impersonal passive in Latin infinitival clauses: Some diachronic considerations
title_sort personal versus impersonal passive in latin infinitival clauses some diachronic considerations
topic infinitive
accusativus cum infinitivo
nominativus cum infinitivo
diachrony
greek
url http://journals.openedition.org/pallas/3751
work_keys_str_mv AT seangleason personalversusimpersonalpassiveinlatininfinitivalclausessomediachronicconsiderations