The Utility and Feasibility of Routine Use of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Paediatric Dentistry

Within healthcare services, there is increasing emphasis to incorporate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), rather than relying solely on clinical outcomes. A 12-item caries-specific measure (CARIES-QC) has been developed and validated for children aged 5–16 years. To date, the routine use of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Graham, Rebecca Knapp, Helen D Rodd, Zoe Marshman, Halla Zaitoun, Fiona Gilchrist
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Oral
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-6373/1/4/28
_version_ 1797501707208359936
author Anna Graham
Rebecca Knapp
Helen D Rodd
Zoe Marshman
Halla Zaitoun
Fiona Gilchrist
author_facet Anna Graham
Rebecca Knapp
Helen D Rodd
Zoe Marshman
Halla Zaitoun
Fiona Gilchrist
author_sort Anna Graham
collection DOAJ
description Within healthcare services, there is increasing emphasis to incorporate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), rather than relying solely on clinical outcomes. A 12-item caries-specific measure (CARIES-QC) has been developed and validated for children aged 5–16 years. To date, the routine use of PROMs in paediatric dentistry new patient clinics (NPC) has not been reported. The aim was to conduct a pilot study to assess the feasibility, utility and validity of routine use of a PROM in paediatric dentistry NPC in a UK teaching hospital. Children attending NPC over a four-week period were asked to complete CARIES-QC with an additional free-text box. Interviews were held with members of staff to assess the feasibility of using a PROM routinely. CARIES-QC was completed by 99 children. Almost half of the participants had caries (<i>n</i> = 49, 49.5%). CARIES-QC demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.9) and reliability with the global question (<i>r</i> = 0.75, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Clinical staff valued the information provided by the PROM. An electronic delivery method would be beneficial to both clinical and administrative staff. CARIES-QC was able to capture impacts for children with a range of oral conditions. Its use aided treatment planning and future studies should investigate the use of an electronic delivery system to reduce the administrative burden.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:22:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-64f68ed55ecd477c9d7975646c308b93
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-6373
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:22:26Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Oral
spelling doaj.art-64f68ed55ecd477c9d7975646c308b932023-11-23T09:59:50ZengMDPI AGOral2673-63732021-10-011429029910.3390/oral1040028The Utility and Feasibility of Routine Use of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Paediatric DentistryAnna Graham0Rebecca Knapp1Helen D Rodd2Zoe Marshman3Halla Zaitoun4Fiona Gilchrist5Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, Sheffield S10 2SZ, UKSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UKSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UKSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UKDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, Sheffield S10 2SZ, UKSchool of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UKWithin healthcare services, there is increasing emphasis to incorporate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), rather than relying solely on clinical outcomes. A 12-item caries-specific measure (CARIES-QC) has been developed and validated for children aged 5–16 years. To date, the routine use of PROMs in paediatric dentistry new patient clinics (NPC) has not been reported. The aim was to conduct a pilot study to assess the feasibility, utility and validity of routine use of a PROM in paediatric dentistry NPC in a UK teaching hospital. Children attending NPC over a four-week period were asked to complete CARIES-QC with an additional free-text box. Interviews were held with members of staff to assess the feasibility of using a PROM routinely. CARIES-QC was completed by 99 children. Almost half of the participants had caries (<i>n</i> = 49, 49.5%). CARIES-QC demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.9) and reliability with the global question (<i>r</i> = 0.75, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Clinical staff valued the information provided by the PROM. An electronic delivery method would be beneficial to both clinical and administrative staff. CARIES-QC was able to capture impacts for children with a range of oral conditions. Its use aided treatment planning and future studies should investigate the use of an electronic delivery system to reduce the administrative burden.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-6373/1/4/28oral health impactspaediatric dentistrypatient-reported outcome measures
spellingShingle Anna Graham
Rebecca Knapp
Helen D Rodd
Zoe Marshman
Halla Zaitoun
Fiona Gilchrist
The Utility and Feasibility of Routine Use of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Paediatric Dentistry
Oral
oral health impacts
paediatric dentistry
patient-reported outcome measures
title The Utility and Feasibility of Routine Use of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Paediatric Dentistry
title_full The Utility and Feasibility of Routine Use of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Paediatric Dentistry
title_fullStr The Utility and Feasibility of Routine Use of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Paediatric Dentistry
title_full_unstemmed The Utility and Feasibility of Routine Use of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Paediatric Dentistry
title_short The Utility and Feasibility of Routine Use of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Paediatric Dentistry
title_sort utility and feasibility of routine use of a patient reported outcome measure in paediatric dentistry
topic oral health impacts
paediatric dentistry
patient-reported outcome measures
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-6373/1/4/28
work_keys_str_mv AT annagraham theutilityandfeasibilityofroutineuseofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureinpaediatricdentistry
AT rebeccaknapp theutilityandfeasibilityofroutineuseofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureinpaediatricdentistry
AT helendrodd theutilityandfeasibilityofroutineuseofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureinpaediatricdentistry
AT zoemarshman theutilityandfeasibilityofroutineuseofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureinpaediatricdentistry
AT hallazaitoun theutilityandfeasibilityofroutineuseofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureinpaediatricdentistry
AT fionagilchrist theutilityandfeasibilityofroutineuseofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureinpaediatricdentistry
AT annagraham utilityandfeasibilityofroutineuseofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureinpaediatricdentistry
AT rebeccaknapp utilityandfeasibilityofroutineuseofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureinpaediatricdentistry
AT helendrodd utilityandfeasibilityofroutineuseofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureinpaediatricdentistry
AT zoemarshman utilityandfeasibilityofroutineuseofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureinpaediatricdentistry
AT hallazaitoun utilityandfeasibilityofroutineuseofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureinpaediatricdentistry
AT fionagilchrist utilityandfeasibilityofroutineuseofapatientreportedoutcomemeasureinpaediatricdentistry