Scientific basis for the trainer aircraft anti-g equipment requirements

The design process of a new aircraft (AC) is always associated with the issue of choosing its basic technical parameters, or, in other words, the formation of its conceptual design. In case of a civil aircraft, the choice of these parameters is defined by the requirements for operational safety, mar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. A. Kiselev, S. V. Levitsky, D. V. Moroshkin
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation 2021-11-01
Series:Научный вестник МГТУ ГА
Subjects:
Online Access:https://avia.mstuca.ru/jour/article/view/1869
_version_ 1826563862002925568
author M. A. Kiselev
S. V. Levitsky
D. V. Moroshkin
author_facet M. A. Kiselev
S. V. Levitsky
D. V. Moroshkin
author_sort M. A. Kiselev
collection DOAJ
description The design process of a new aircraft (AC) is always associated with the issue of choosing its basic technical parameters, or, in other words, the formation of its conceptual design. In case of a civil aircraft, the choice of these parameters is defined by the requirements for operational safety, market conditions, norms that specify the tolerable harmful impact of the aircraft on the environment, etc. In case of a military aircraft, its outlay mostly depends on the concept of potential military threats, ways of using the military aircraft in military conflicts. Some of these requirements are formulated in regulatory documents – the Aviation Requirements for Civil Aircraft and the General Tactical and Technical Requirements of the Air Force for Military Aircraft. For example, Part 25 of the Aviation Requirements for Civil Aircraft defines the Airworthiness Standards for transport aircraft. It should be noted that the stated above requirements are often a tool of competition, for example, when tightening the aircraft noise abatement procedures provides advantages for particular manufacturers, not admitting other manufacturers to enter the market, whose aircraft do not conform to the new standards. Thus, complying with the requirements virtually involves additional costs both in the aircraft development and during its operation. In addition, the implementation of the requirements stated above can lead to the deterioration of the aircraft’s performance, and hence, to the decrease of its competiveness and combat effectiveness. Therefore, each requirement of the regulatory documents should have a profound scientific rationale. This article analyzes one of the regulatory documents requirements referring to the necessity of anti-g system on board aircraft. The authors propose the approach to specify the existing criterion to provide the scientific basis for the anti-g system on board aircraft by assessing the actual level of pilot load when maneuvering. The subject under study is of particular importance for the Yak-152 trainer aircraft. The actual level of loads during pilotage of the Yak-152 trainer aircraft does not require the use of the anti-g system but if to be based on a formal criterion, namely, in terms of the maximum operational overload value, the aircraft should be fitted out with such a system.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T03:42:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-64f8af87c36f407ea94c8f7a5fd36688
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-0619
2542-0119
language Russian
last_indexed 2025-03-14T10:10:42Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation
record_format Article
series Научный вестник МГТУ ГА
spelling doaj.art-64f8af87c36f407ea94c8f7a5fd366882025-03-02T11:13:40ZrusMoscow State Technical University of Civil AviationНаучный вестник МГТУ ГА2079-06192542-01192021-11-01245495910.26467/2079-0619-2021-24-5-49-591411Scientific basis for the trainer aircraft anti-g equipment requirementsM. A. Kiselev0S. V. Levitsky1D. V. Moroshkin2Moscow State Technical University of Civil AviationJSC Irkut CorporationJSC Irkut CorporationThe design process of a new aircraft (AC) is always associated with the issue of choosing its basic technical parameters, or, in other words, the formation of its conceptual design. In case of a civil aircraft, the choice of these parameters is defined by the requirements for operational safety, market conditions, norms that specify the tolerable harmful impact of the aircraft on the environment, etc. In case of a military aircraft, its outlay mostly depends on the concept of potential military threats, ways of using the military aircraft in military conflicts. Some of these requirements are formulated in regulatory documents – the Aviation Requirements for Civil Aircraft and the General Tactical and Technical Requirements of the Air Force for Military Aircraft. For example, Part 25 of the Aviation Requirements for Civil Aircraft defines the Airworthiness Standards for transport aircraft. It should be noted that the stated above requirements are often a tool of competition, for example, when tightening the aircraft noise abatement procedures provides advantages for particular manufacturers, not admitting other manufacturers to enter the market, whose aircraft do not conform to the new standards. Thus, complying with the requirements virtually involves additional costs both in the aircraft development and during its operation. In addition, the implementation of the requirements stated above can lead to the deterioration of the aircraft’s performance, and hence, to the decrease of its competiveness and combat effectiveness. Therefore, each requirement of the regulatory documents should have a profound scientific rationale. This article analyzes one of the regulatory documents requirements referring to the necessity of anti-g system on board aircraft. The authors propose the approach to specify the existing criterion to provide the scientific basis for the anti-g system on board aircraft by assessing the actual level of pilot load when maneuvering. The subject under study is of particular importance for the Yak-152 trainer aircraft. The actual level of loads during pilotage of the Yak-152 trainer aircraft does not require the use of the anti-g system but if to be based on a formal criterion, namely, in terms of the maximum operational overload value, the aircraft should be fitted out with such a system.https://avia.mstuca.ru/jour/article/view/1869g-loadanti-g systemtrainer aircraf
spellingShingle M. A. Kiselev
S. V. Levitsky
D. V. Moroshkin
Scientific basis for the trainer aircraft anti-g equipment requirements
Научный вестник МГТУ ГА
g-load
anti-g system
trainer aircraf
title Scientific basis for the trainer aircraft anti-g equipment requirements
title_full Scientific basis for the trainer aircraft anti-g equipment requirements
title_fullStr Scientific basis for the trainer aircraft anti-g equipment requirements
title_full_unstemmed Scientific basis for the trainer aircraft anti-g equipment requirements
title_short Scientific basis for the trainer aircraft anti-g equipment requirements
title_sort scientific basis for the trainer aircraft anti g equipment requirements
topic g-load
anti-g system
trainer aircraf
url https://avia.mstuca.ru/jour/article/view/1869
work_keys_str_mv AT makiselev scientificbasisforthetraineraircraftantigequipmentrequirements
AT svlevitsky scientificbasisforthetraineraircraftantigequipmentrequirements
AT dvmoroshkin scientificbasisforthetraineraircraftantigequipmentrequirements