Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
ABSTRACT Objective: To comparatively evaluate the traditional interrupted knot-tying and running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl® in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 62 consecutive patients undergoing LPN using traditional interrupted knot...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
|
| Series: | International Brazilian Journal of Urology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000500863&lng=en&tlng=en |
| _version_ | 1811281350571851776 |
|---|---|
| author | Onur Kaygisiz Sinan Çelen Berna Aytac Vuruşkan Hakan Vuruşkan |
| author_facet | Onur Kaygisiz Sinan Çelen Berna Aytac Vuruşkan Hakan Vuruşkan |
| author_sort | Onur Kaygisiz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Objective: To comparatively evaluate the traditional interrupted knot-tying and running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl® in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 62 consecutive patients undergoing LPN using traditional interrupted knot-tying suture renorrhaphy (Group 1; n=31) or running suture technique renorrhaphy with 2-0 monofilament polyglecaprone (Monocryl®, Ethicon) (Group 2; n=31) from December 2011 to October 2015 at the University. All patients underwent LPN performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The demographic, perioperative and postoperative parameters were compared between the groups, and the effect of both suture techniques on the warm ischemic time (WIT) and trifecta were evaluated. Results: The running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl® reduced WIT, estimated blood lost and length of hospitalization stay significantly without increasing postoperative complication rate during LPN in comparison with interrupted knot-tying suture. Conclusion: The renorrhaphy using the running suture with Monocryl® is an effective and safe technique with the advantage of shortening WIT even in more challenging and larger tumors during LPN. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T01:30:47Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6507e653f8f042ffbce8f06b7021c516 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1677-6119 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T01:30:47Z |
| publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Brazilian Journal of Urology |
| spelling | doaj.art-6507e653f8f042ffbce8f06b7021c5162022-12-22T03:08:30ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-611943586387010.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0550S1677-55382017000500863Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomyOnur KaygisizSinan ÇelenBerna Aytac VuruşkanHakan VuruşkanABSTRACT Objective: To comparatively evaluate the traditional interrupted knot-tying and running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl® in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 62 consecutive patients undergoing LPN using traditional interrupted knot-tying suture renorrhaphy (Group 1; n=31) or running suture technique renorrhaphy with 2-0 monofilament polyglecaprone (Monocryl®, Ethicon) (Group 2; n=31) from December 2011 to October 2015 at the University. All patients underwent LPN performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The demographic, perioperative and postoperative parameters were compared between the groups, and the effect of both suture techniques on the warm ischemic time (WIT) and trifecta were evaluated. Results: The running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl® reduced WIT, estimated blood lost and length of hospitalization stay significantly without increasing postoperative complication rate during LPN in comparison with interrupted knot-tying suture. Conclusion: The renorrhaphy using the running suture with Monocryl® is an effective and safe technique with the advantage of shortening WIT even in more challenging and larger tumors during LPN.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000500863&lng=en&tlng=enNephrectomyLaparoscopySuture Techniques |
| spellingShingle | Onur Kaygisiz Sinan Çelen Berna Aytac Vuruşkan Hakan Vuruşkan Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy International Brazilian Journal of Urology Nephrectomy Laparoscopy Suture Techniques |
| title | Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy |
| title_full | Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy |
| title_short | Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy |
| title_sort | comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy |
| topic | Nephrectomy Laparoscopy Suture Techniques |
| url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000500863&lng=en&tlng=en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT onurkaygisiz comparisonoftwodifferentsuturetechniquesinlaparoscopicpartialnephrectomy AT sinancelen comparisonoftwodifferentsuturetechniquesinlaparoscopicpartialnephrectomy AT bernaaytacvuruskan comparisonoftwodifferentsuturetechniquesinlaparoscopicpartialnephrectomy AT hakanvuruskan comparisonoftwodifferentsuturetechniquesinlaparoscopicpartialnephrectomy |