Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies
Background: Automated whole slide imaging (WSI), also known as virtual microscopy is rapidly becoming an important tool in diagnostic pathology. Currently, the primary utilization of the technique is for transmission of digital images, for second opinion consultation, as well as for quality assuranc...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pathology Informatics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2014;volume=5;issue=1;spage=5;epage=5;aulast=Reyes |
| _version_ | 1818264882029527040 |
|---|---|
| author | Carolina Reyes Offiong F Ikpatt Mehrdad Nadji Richard J Cote |
| author_facet | Carolina Reyes Offiong F Ikpatt Mehrdad Nadji Richard J Cote |
| author_sort | Carolina Reyes |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Automated whole slide imaging (WSI), also known as virtual microscopy is rapidly becoming an important tool in diagnostic pathology. Currently, the primary utilization of the technique is for transmission of digital images, for second opinion consultation, as well as for quality assurance and education. The high-resolution of digital images along with the refinement of technology could now allow for WSI to be used as an alternative to conventional microscopy (CM) as a first line diagnostic platform. However, the accuracy and reproducibility of the technology for the routine histopathologic diagnosis has not been established yet. This study was undertaken to compare the intra-observer variability of WSI and CM in the primary diagnosis of breast biopsies. Materials and Methods: One hundred and three consecutive core needle biopsies of breast were selected for this study. Each slide was digitally scanned and the images were stored in a shared file. Three board-certified pathologists independently reviewed the glass slides by CM first, and in an interval of 2-3 weeks for the 2nd time to establish their baseline CM versus CM reproducibility. They then reviewed the digital images of all cases following the same interval of time to compare the reproducibility of WSI versus CM for each observer. The diagnostic categories included the typical range of benign and malignant mammary lesions. Results: The intra-observer variability for CM versus CM was 4%, 7%, and 0% for observers 1, 2, and 3 respectively. The diagnostic variability for WSI versus CM was 1%, 4%, and 1% for the same observers. All diagnostic disagreements were between ductal hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. There was no intra-observer disagreement in the diagnosis of benign versus malignant disease. Conclusions: The intra-observer variability in the diagnosis of the core needle biopsies of the breast by high-resolution, WSI was the same as conventional glass slide microscopy. These results suggest that, WSI could be used similar to CM for the initial diagnosis of breast biopsies. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T19:41:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-650f726018e44971b1c092133e7c99cf |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2153-3539 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T19:41:58Z |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pathology Informatics |
| spelling | doaj.art-650f726018e44971b1c092133e7c99cf2022-12-22T00:14:11ZengElsevierJournal of Pathology Informatics2153-35392014-01-01515510.4103/2153-3539.127814Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsiesCarolina ReyesOffiong F IkpattMehrdad NadjiRichard J CoteBackground: Automated whole slide imaging (WSI), also known as virtual microscopy is rapidly becoming an important tool in diagnostic pathology. Currently, the primary utilization of the technique is for transmission of digital images, for second opinion consultation, as well as for quality assurance and education. The high-resolution of digital images along with the refinement of technology could now allow for WSI to be used as an alternative to conventional microscopy (CM) as a first line diagnostic platform. However, the accuracy and reproducibility of the technology for the routine histopathologic diagnosis has not been established yet. This study was undertaken to compare the intra-observer variability of WSI and CM in the primary diagnosis of breast biopsies. Materials and Methods: One hundred and three consecutive core needle biopsies of breast were selected for this study. Each slide was digitally scanned and the images were stored in a shared file. Three board-certified pathologists independently reviewed the glass slides by CM first, and in an interval of 2-3 weeks for the 2nd time to establish their baseline CM versus CM reproducibility. They then reviewed the digital images of all cases following the same interval of time to compare the reproducibility of WSI versus CM for each observer. The diagnostic categories included the typical range of benign and malignant mammary lesions. Results: The intra-observer variability for CM versus CM was 4%, 7%, and 0% for observers 1, 2, and 3 respectively. The diagnostic variability for WSI versus CM was 1%, 4%, and 1% for the same observers. All diagnostic disagreements were between ductal hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia. There was no intra-observer disagreement in the diagnosis of benign versus malignant disease. Conclusions: The intra-observer variability in the diagnosis of the core needle biopsies of the breast by high-resolution, WSI was the same as conventional glass slide microscopy. These results suggest that, WSI could be used similar to CM for the initial diagnosis of breast biopsies.http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2014;volume=5;issue=1;spage=5;epage=5;aulast=ReyesBreast biopsy, digital microscopy, reproducibility, whole slide imaging |
| spellingShingle | Carolina Reyes Offiong F Ikpatt Mehrdad Nadji Richard J Cote Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies Journal of Pathology Informatics Breast biopsy, digital microscopy, reproducibility, whole slide imaging |
| title | Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies |
| title_full | Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies |
| title_fullStr | Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies |
| title_short | Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies |
| title_sort | intra observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies |
| topic | Breast biopsy, digital microscopy, reproducibility, whole slide imaging |
| url | http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2014;volume=5;issue=1;spage=5;epage=5;aulast=Reyes |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT carolinareyes intraobserverreproducibilityofwholeslideimagingfortheprimarydiagnosisofbreastneedlebiopsies AT offiongfikpatt intraobserverreproducibilityofwholeslideimagingfortheprimarydiagnosisofbreastneedlebiopsies AT mehrdadnadji intraobserverreproducibilityofwholeslideimagingfortheprimarydiagnosisofbreastneedlebiopsies AT richardjcote intraobserverreproducibilityofwholeslideimagingfortheprimarydiagnosisofbreastneedlebiopsies |