Hazards of Risk: Identifying Plausible Community Wildfire Disasters in Low-Frequency Fire Regimes

Optimized wildfire risk reduction strategies are generally not resilient in the event of unanticipated, or very rare events, presenting a hazard in risk assessments which otherwise rely on actuarial, mean-based statistics to characterize risk. This hazard of actuarial approaches to wildfire risk is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andy McEvoy, Becky K. Kerns, John B. Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/7/934
_version_ 1797527100322742272
author Andy McEvoy
Becky K. Kerns
John B. Kim
author_facet Andy McEvoy
Becky K. Kerns
John B. Kim
author_sort Andy McEvoy
collection DOAJ
description Optimized wildfire risk reduction strategies are generally not resilient in the event of unanticipated, or very rare events, presenting a hazard in risk assessments which otherwise rely on actuarial, mean-based statistics to characterize risk. This hazard of actuarial approaches to wildfire risk is perhaps particularly evident for infrequent fire regimes such as those in the temperate forests west of the Cascade Range crest in Oregon and Washington, USA (“Westside”), where fire return intervals often exceed 200 years but where fires can be extremely intense and devastating. In this study, we used wildfire simulations and building location data to evaluate community wildfire exposure and identify plausible disasters that are not based on typical mean-based statistical approaches. We compared the location and magnitude of simulated disasters to historical disasters (1984–2020) in order to characterize plausible surprises which could inform future wildfire risk reduction planning. Results indicate that nearly half of communities are vulnerable to a future disaster, that the magnitude of plausible disasters exceeds any recent historical events, and that ignitions on private land are most likely to result in very high community exposure. Our methods, in combination with more typical actuarial characterizations, provide a way to support investment in and communication with communities exposed to low-probability, high-consequence wildfires.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T09:39:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6515ad85232a4be2b8bee9873dcba48e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T09:39:13Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-6515ad85232a4be2b8bee9873dcba48e2023-11-22T03:49:53ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072021-07-0112793410.3390/f12070934Hazards of Risk: Identifying Plausible Community Wildfire Disasters in Low-Frequency Fire RegimesAndy McEvoy0Becky K. Kerns1John B. Kim2USDA Forest Service, ORISE Fellow, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR 97331, USAUSDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR 97331, USAUSDA Western Wildland Environmental Threat Assessment Center, Corvallis, OR 97754, USAOptimized wildfire risk reduction strategies are generally not resilient in the event of unanticipated, or very rare events, presenting a hazard in risk assessments which otherwise rely on actuarial, mean-based statistics to characterize risk. This hazard of actuarial approaches to wildfire risk is perhaps particularly evident for infrequent fire regimes such as those in the temperate forests west of the Cascade Range crest in Oregon and Washington, USA (“Westside”), where fire return intervals often exceed 200 years but where fires can be extremely intense and devastating. In this study, we used wildfire simulations and building location data to evaluate community wildfire exposure and identify plausible disasters that are not based on typical mean-based statistical approaches. We compared the location and magnitude of simulated disasters to historical disasters (1984–2020) in order to characterize plausible surprises which could inform future wildfire risk reduction planning. Results indicate that nearly half of communities are vulnerable to a future disaster, that the magnitude of plausible disasters exceeds any recent historical events, and that ignitions on private land are most likely to result in very high community exposure. Our methods, in combination with more typical actuarial characterizations, provide a way to support investment in and communication with communities exposed to low-probability, high-consequence wildfires.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/7/934wildfire riskrisk assessmentcommunity exposureFSimsurprisewildfire disaster
spellingShingle Andy McEvoy
Becky K. Kerns
John B. Kim
Hazards of Risk: Identifying Plausible Community Wildfire Disasters in Low-Frequency Fire Regimes
Forests
wildfire risk
risk assessment
community exposure
FSim
surprise
wildfire disaster
title Hazards of Risk: Identifying Plausible Community Wildfire Disasters in Low-Frequency Fire Regimes
title_full Hazards of Risk: Identifying Plausible Community Wildfire Disasters in Low-Frequency Fire Regimes
title_fullStr Hazards of Risk: Identifying Plausible Community Wildfire Disasters in Low-Frequency Fire Regimes
title_full_unstemmed Hazards of Risk: Identifying Plausible Community Wildfire Disasters in Low-Frequency Fire Regimes
title_short Hazards of Risk: Identifying Plausible Community Wildfire Disasters in Low-Frequency Fire Regimes
title_sort hazards of risk identifying plausible community wildfire disasters in low frequency fire regimes
topic wildfire risk
risk assessment
community exposure
FSim
surprise
wildfire disaster
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/7/934
work_keys_str_mv AT andymcevoy hazardsofriskidentifyingplausiblecommunitywildfiredisastersinlowfrequencyfireregimes
AT beckykkerns hazardsofriskidentifyingplausiblecommunitywildfiredisastersinlowfrequencyfireregimes
AT johnbkim hazardsofriskidentifyingplausiblecommunitywildfiredisastersinlowfrequencyfireregimes