ACCEPTABLE AUDIT RISK EVIDENCE IN JAKARTA INDONESIA

Early 20’s century begins with revealed some accounting financial scandals from reputable companies around the world’s where the economic crisis starts. Facts from some cases proofed that the auditors have weakness in assessing audit risk from those reputable companies (some are Enron (2001), worldc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mira Rahmi, Susi Indriani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, UPN Veteran Jakarta 2017-12-01
Series:Ekonomi dan Bisnis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/ekobis/article/view/741/pdf
_version_ 1818621005790183424
author Mira Rahmi
Susi Indriani
author_facet Mira Rahmi
Susi Indriani
author_sort Mira Rahmi
collection DOAJ
description Early 20’s century begins with revealed some accounting financial scandals from reputable companies around the world’s where the economic crisis starts. Facts from some cases proofed that the auditors have weakness in assessing audit risk from those reputable companies (some are Enron (2001), worldcom (2002), Madoff (2008), and Saytam (2009)), recent years the scandals were happens to Japan companies where it hits Olympus (2011) and Toshiba (2015). Indonesia had Kimia Farma (2002) for example where the auditor were convicted less professional from assessing acceptable audit risk. The phenomena showed that auditors have big uncertainty of risk when they do the audit process and highly related to their integrity in doing the process. Assessment audit about clients will be influenced by the approach that was undertaken, audit planning program, risk assessment and how to analyze audit evidence (Bell et al; 2005). This research were aimed to give an empirical evidence on public accountants behavior in Jakarta, Indonesia when assessing acceptable audit risk based on their independent auditors. Using 11 public accountant offices in south and east Jakarta were picked randomly from OJK Public accountant offices Listed in 2015 with multivariate regression model between audit complexity, audit sampling judgment and management integrity toward acceptable audit risk. The result showed that the small portion of audit sampling judgment were set by the public accountants when they give their opiniondo makes the acceptable risk getting higher. Audit complexity and management integrity didn’t show related toward acceptable audit riskin public accountant offices in Jakarta during 2015.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T18:02:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-651f96987fed455db871e93b2928ca97
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2356-0282
2684-7582
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T18:02:24Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, UPN Veteran Jakarta
record_format Article
series Ekonomi dan Bisnis
spelling doaj.art-651f96987fed455db871e93b2928ca972022-12-21T22:22:01ZengFakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, UPN Veteran JakartaEkonomi dan Bisnis2356-02822684-75822017-12-0142135156http://dx.doi.org/10.35590/jeb.v4i2.741ACCEPTABLE AUDIT RISK EVIDENCE IN JAKARTA INDONESIAMira Rahmi0Susi Indriani1Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran JakartaUniversitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran JakartaEarly 20’s century begins with revealed some accounting financial scandals from reputable companies around the world’s where the economic crisis starts. Facts from some cases proofed that the auditors have weakness in assessing audit risk from those reputable companies (some are Enron (2001), worldcom (2002), Madoff (2008), and Saytam (2009)), recent years the scandals were happens to Japan companies where it hits Olympus (2011) and Toshiba (2015). Indonesia had Kimia Farma (2002) for example where the auditor were convicted less professional from assessing acceptable audit risk. The phenomena showed that auditors have big uncertainty of risk when they do the audit process and highly related to their integrity in doing the process. Assessment audit about clients will be influenced by the approach that was undertaken, audit planning program, risk assessment and how to analyze audit evidence (Bell et al; 2005). This research were aimed to give an empirical evidence on public accountants behavior in Jakarta, Indonesia when assessing acceptable audit risk based on their independent auditors. Using 11 public accountant offices in south and east Jakarta were picked randomly from OJK Public accountant offices Listed in 2015 with multivariate regression model between audit complexity, audit sampling judgment and management integrity toward acceptable audit risk. The result showed that the small portion of audit sampling judgment were set by the public accountants when they give their opiniondo makes the acceptable risk getting higher. Audit complexity and management integrity didn’t show related toward acceptable audit riskin public accountant offices in Jakarta during 2015.https://ejournal.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/ekobis/article/view/741/pdfcocokindependenpenilaian auditresiko audit
spellingShingle Mira Rahmi
Susi Indriani
ACCEPTABLE AUDIT RISK EVIDENCE IN JAKARTA INDONESIA
Ekonomi dan Bisnis
cocok
independen
penilaian audit
resiko audit
title ACCEPTABLE AUDIT RISK EVIDENCE IN JAKARTA INDONESIA
title_full ACCEPTABLE AUDIT RISK EVIDENCE IN JAKARTA INDONESIA
title_fullStr ACCEPTABLE AUDIT RISK EVIDENCE IN JAKARTA INDONESIA
title_full_unstemmed ACCEPTABLE AUDIT RISK EVIDENCE IN JAKARTA INDONESIA
title_short ACCEPTABLE AUDIT RISK EVIDENCE IN JAKARTA INDONESIA
title_sort acceptable audit risk evidence in jakarta indonesia
topic cocok
independen
penilaian audit
resiko audit
url https://ejournal.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/ekobis/article/view/741/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mirarahmi acceptableauditriskevidenceinjakartaindonesia
AT susiindriani acceptableauditriskevidenceinjakartaindonesia