Evaluation of WRF-Chem-simulated meteorology and aerosols over northern India during the severe pollution episode of 2016

<p>We use a state-of-the-art regional chemistry transport model (WRF-Chem v4.2.1) to simulate particulate air pollution over northern India during September–November 2016. This period includes a severe air pollution episode marked by exceedingly high levels of hourly PM<span class="inl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Agarwal, D. S. Stevenson, M. R. Heal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2024-02-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2239/2024/acp-24-2239-2024.pdf
_version_ 1797300219775287296
author P. Agarwal
D. S. Stevenson
M. R. Heal
author_facet P. Agarwal
D. S. Stevenson
M. R. Heal
author_sort P. Agarwal
collection DOAJ
description <p>We use a state-of-the-art regional chemistry transport model (WRF-Chem v4.2.1) to simulate particulate air pollution over northern India during September–November 2016. This period includes a severe air pollution episode marked by exceedingly high levels of hourly PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> (particulate matter having an aerodynamic diameter <span class="inline-formula">≤</span> 2.5 <span class="inline-formula">µ</span>m) during 30 October to 7 November, particularly over the wider Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP). We provide a comprehensive evaluation of simulated seasonal meteorology (nudged by ERA5 reanalysis products) and aerosol chemistry (PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> and its black carbon (BC) component) using a range of ground-based, satellite and reanalysis products, with a focus on the November 2016 haze episode. We find the daily and diurnal features in simulated surface temperature show the best agreement followed by relative humidity, with the largest discrepancies being an overestimate of night-time wind speeds (up to 1.5 m s<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>) confirmed by both ground and radiosonde observations. Upper-air meteorology comparisons with radiosonde observations show excellent model skill in reproducing the vertical temperature gradient (<span class="inline-formula"><i>r</i>&gt;0.9</span>). We evaluate modelled PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> at 20 observation sites across the IGP including eight in Delhi and compare simulated aerosol optical depth (AOD) with data from four AERONET sites. We also compare our model aerosol results with MERRA-2 reanalysis aerosol fields and MODIS satellite AOD. We find that the model captures many features of the observed aerosol distributions but tends to overestimate PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> during September (by a factor of 2) due to too much dust, and underestimate peak PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> during the severe episode. Delhi experiences some of the highest daily mean PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> concentrations within the study region, with dominant components nitrate (<span class="inline-formula">∼25</span> %), dust (<span class="inline-formula">∼25</span> %), secondary organic aerosols (<span class="inline-formula">∼20</span> %) and ammonium (<span class="inline-formula">∼10</span> %). Modelled PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> and BC spatially correlate well with MERRA-2 products across the whole domain. High AOD at 550nm across the IGP is also well predicted by the model relative to MODIS satellite (<span class="inline-formula"><i>r</i>≥0.8</span>) and ground-based AERONET observations (<span class="inline-formula"><i>r</i>≥0.7</span>), except during September. Overall, the model realistically captures the seasonal and spatial variations of meteorology and ambient pollution over northern India. However, the observed underestimations in pollutant concentrations likely come from a combination of underestimated emissions, too much night-time dispersion, and some missing or poorly represented aerosol chemistry processes. Nevertheless, we find the model is sufficiently accurate to be a useful tool for exploring the sources and processes that control PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> levels during severe pollution episodes.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T23:04:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-652235c2638745b3aeb4dea1c7814913
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T23:04:09Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-652235c2638745b3aeb4dea1c78149132024-02-22T07:31:12ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242024-02-01242239226610.5194/acp-24-2239-2024Evaluation of WRF-Chem-simulated meteorology and aerosols over northern India during the severe pollution episode of 2016P. Agarwal0D. S. Stevenson1M. R. Heal2School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Crew Building, Edinburgh, EH9 3FF, UKSchool of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Crew Building, Edinburgh, EH9 3FF, UKSchool of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Joseph Black Building, Edinburgh, EH9 3FJ, UK<p>We use a state-of-the-art regional chemistry transport model (WRF-Chem v4.2.1) to simulate particulate air pollution over northern India during September–November 2016. This period includes a severe air pollution episode marked by exceedingly high levels of hourly PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> (particulate matter having an aerodynamic diameter <span class="inline-formula">≤</span> 2.5 <span class="inline-formula">µ</span>m) during 30 October to 7 November, particularly over the wider Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP). We provide a comprehensive evaluation of simulated seasonal meteorology (nudged by ERA5 reanalysis products) and aerosol chemistry (PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> and its black carbon (BC) component) using a range of ground-based, satellite and reanalysis products, with a focus on the November 2016 haze episode. We find the daily and diurnal features in simulated surface temperature show the best agreement followed by relative humidity, with the largest discrepancies being an overestimate of night-time wind speeds (up to 1.5 m s<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>) confirmed by both ground and radiosonde observations. Upper-air meteorology comparisons with radiosonde observations show excellent model skill in reproducing the vertical temperature gradient (<span class="inline-formula"><i>r</i>&gt;0.9</span>). We evaluate modelled PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> at 20 observation sites across the IGP including eight in Delhi and compare simulated aerosol optical depth (AOD) with data from four AERONET sites. We also compare our model aerosol results with MERRA-2 reanalysis aerosol fields and MODIS satellite AOD. We find that the model captures many features of the observed aerosol distributions but tends to overestimate PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> during September (by a factor of 2) due to too much dust, and underestimate peak PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> during the severe episode. Delhi experiences some of the highest daily mean PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> concentrations within the study region, with dominant components nitrate (<span class="inline-formula">∼25</span> %), dust (<span class="inline-formula">∼25</span> %), secondary organic aerosols (<span class="inline-formula">∼20</span> %) and ammonium (<span class="inline-formula">∼10</span> %). Modelled PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> and BC spatially correlate well with MERRA-2 products across the whole domain. High AOD at 550nm across the IGP is also well predicted by the model relative to MODIS satellite (<span class="inline-formula"><i>r</i>≥0.8</span>) and ground-based AERONET observations (<span class="inline-formula"><i>r</i>≥0.7</span>), except during September. Overall, the model realistically captures the seasonal and spatial variations of meteorology and ambient pollution over northern India. However, the observed underestimations in pollutant concentrations likely come from a combination of underestimated emissions, too much night-time dispersion, and some missing or poorly represented aerosol chemistry processes. Nevertheless, we find the model is sufficiently accurate to be a useful tool for exploring the sources and processes that control PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> levels during severe pollution episodes.</p>https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2239/2024/acp-24-2239-2024.pdf
spellingShingle P. Agarwal
D. S. Stevenson
M. R. Heal
Evaluation of WRF-Chem-simulated meteorology and aerosols over northern India during the severe pollution episode of 2016
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Evaluation of WRF-Chem-simulated meteorology and aerosols over northern India during the severe pollution episode of 2016
title_full Evaluation of WRF-Chem-simulated meteorology and aerosols over northern India during the severe pollution episode of 2016
title_fullStr Evaluation of WRF-Chem-simulated meteorology and aerosols over northern India during the severe pollution episode of 2016
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of WRF-Chem-simulated meteorology and aerosols over northern India during the severe pollution episode of 2016
title_short Evaluation of WRF-Chem-simulated meteorology and aerosols over northern India during the severe pollution episode of 2016
title_sort evaluation of wrf chem simulated meteorology and aerosols over northern india during the severe pollution episode of 2016
url https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2239/2024/acp-24-2239-2024.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pagarwal evaluationofwrfchemsimulatedmeteorologyandaerosolsovernorthernindiaduringtheseverepollutionepisodeof2016
AT dsstevenson evaluationofwrfchemsimulatedmeteorologyandaerosolsovernorthernindiaduringtheseverepollutionepisodeof2016
AT mrheal evaluationofwrfchemsimulatedmeteorologyandaerosolsovernorthernindiaduringtheseverepollutionepisodeof2016