State cannabis laws and cannabis positivity among fatally injured drivers

Abstract Background As of November 8, 2023, 24 states and the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis for both recreational and medical use (RMCL-states), 14 states have legalized cannabis for medical use only (MCL-states) and 12 states have no comprehensive cannabis legislation (NoCL-states)....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thea Clare Leavitt, Stanford Chihuri, Guohua Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-04-01
Series:Injury Epidemiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00498-1
_version_ 1797209561297321984
author Thea Clare Leavitt
Stanford Chihuri
Guohua Li
author_facet Thea Clare Leavitt
Stanford Chihuri
Guohua Li
author_sort Thea Clare Leavitt
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background As of November 8, 2023, 24 states and the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis for both recreational and medical use (RMCL-states), 14 states have legalized cannabis for medical use only (MCL-states) and 12 states have no comprehensive cannabis legislation (NoCL-states). As more states legalize cannabis for recreational use, it is critical to understand the impact of such policies on driving safety. Methods Using the 2019 and 2020 Fatality Analysis Reporting System data, we performed multivariable logistic regression modeling to explore the association between state level legalization status and cannabis positivity using toxicological testing data for 14,079 fatally injured drivers. We performed a sensitivity analysis by including multiply imputed toxicological testing data for the 14,876 eligible drivers with missing toxicological testing data. Results Overall, 4702 (33.4%) of the 14,079 fatally injured drivers tested positive for cannabis use. The prevalence of cannabis positivity was 30.7% in NoCL-states, 32.8% in MCL-states, and 38.2% in RMCL-states (p < 0.001). Compared to drivers fatally injured in NoCL-states, the adjusted odds ratios of testing positive for cannabis were 1.09 (95% confidence interval: 0.99, 1.19) for those fatally injured in MCL-states and 1.54 (95% confidence interval: 1.34, 1.77) for those fatally injured in RMCL-states. Sensitivity analysis yielded similar results. Conclusions Over one-third of fatally injured drivers tested positive for cannabis use. Drivers fatally injured in states with laws permitting recreational use of cannabis were significantly more likely to test positive for cannabis use than those in states without such laws. State medical cannabis laws had little impact on the odds of cannabis positivity among fatally injured drivers.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T09:56:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-653441cbabb54388ae3905e7ce534ce4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2197-1714
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T09:56:39Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Injury Epidemiology
spelling doaj.art-653441cbabb54388ae3905e7ce534ce42024-04-14T11:05:33ZengBMCInjury Epidemiology2197-17142024-04-0111111010.1186/s40621-024-00498-1State cannabis laws and cannabis positivity among fatally injured driversThea Clare Leavitt0Stanford Chihuri1Guohua Li2Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public HealthDepartment of Anesthesiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and SurgeonsDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public HealthAbstract Background As of November 8, 2023, 24 states and the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis for both recreational and medical use (RMCL-states), 14 states have legalized cannabis for medical use only (MCL-states) and 12 states have no comprehensive cannabis legislation (NoCL-states). As more states legalize cannabis for recreational use, it is critical to understand the impact of such policies on driving safety. Methods Using the 2019 and 2020 Fatality Analysis Reporting System data, we performed multivariable logistic regression modeling to explore the association between state level legalization status and cannabis positivity using toxicological testing data for 14,079 fatally injured drivers. We performed a sensitivity analysis by including multiply imputed toxicological testing data for the 14,876 eligible drivers with missing toxicological testing data. Results Overall, 4702 (33.4%) of the 14,079 fatally injured drivers tested positive for cannabis use. The prevalence of cannabis positivity was 30.7% in NoCL-states, 32.8% in MCL-states, and 38.2% in RMCL-states (p < 0.001). Compared to drivers fatally injured in NoCL-states, the adjusted odds ratios of testing positive for cannabis were 1.09 (95% confidence interval: 0.99, 1.19) for those fatally injured in MCL-states and 1.54 (95% confidence interval: 1.34, 1.77) for those fatally injured in RMCL-states. Sensitivity analysis yielded similar results. Conclusions Over one-third of fatally injured drivers tested positive for cannabis use. Drivers fatally injured in states with laws permitting recreational use of cannabis were significantly more likely to test positive for cannabis use than those in states without such laws. State medical cannabis laws had little impact on the odds of cannabis positivity among fatally injured drivers.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00498-1CannabisDriving safetyDrug policyEvaluation researchLawsMotor vehicle crashes
spellingShingle Thea Clare Leavitt
Stanford Chihuri
Guohua Li
State cannabis laws and cannabis positivity among fatally injured drivers
Injury Epidemiology
Cannabis
Driving safety
Drug policy
Evaluation research
Laws
Motor vehicle crashes
title State cannabis laws and cannabis positivity among fatally injured drivers
title_full State cannabis laws and cannabis positivity among fatally injured drivers
title_fullStr State cannabis laws and cannabis positivity among fatally injured drivers
title_full_unstemmed State cannabis laws and cannabis positivity among fatally injured drivers
title_short State cannabis laws and cannabis positivity among fatally injured drivers
title_sort state cannabis laws and cannabis positivity among fatally injured drivers
topic Cannabis
Driving safety
Drug policy
Evaluation research
Laws
Motor vehicle crashes
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00498-1
work_keys_str_mv AT theaclareleavitt statecannabislawsandcannabispositivityamongfatallyinjureddrivers
AT stanfordchihuri statecannabislawsandcannabispositivityamongfatallyinjureddrivers
AT guohuali statecannabislawsandcannabispositivityamongfatallyinjureddrivers