Impact of mouse strain and sex when modeling radiation necrosis

Abstract Background Murine models are among the most common type of preclinical animal models used to study the human condition, but a wide selection of different mice is currently in use with these differences potentially compromising study results and impairing the ability to reconcile interstudy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew J. Boria, Carlos J. Perez-Torres
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-020-01585-5
_version_ 1818388123189510144
author Andrew J. Boria
Carlos J. Perez-Torres
author_facet Andrew J. Boria
Carlos J. Perez-Torres
author_sort Andrew J. Boria
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Murine models are among the most common type of preclinical animal models used to study the human condition, but a wide selection of different mice is currently in use with these differences potentially compromising study results and impairing the ability to reconcile interstudy results. Our goal was to determine how the strain and sex of the mice selection would affect the development of radiation necrosis in our murine model of radiation-induced cerebral necrosis. Methods We generated this model by using a preclinical irradiator to irradiate a sub-hemispheric portion of the brain of mice with single-fraction doses of 80 Gy. Eight possible combinations of mice made up of two different with two substrains each (BALB/cN, BALB/cJ, C57BL/6 N, and C57BL/6 J) and both sexes were irradiated in this study. Radiation necrosis development was tracked up to 8 weeks with a 7 T Bruker MRI utilizing T2-weighted and post-contrast T1-weighted imaging. MRI results were compared to and validated with the use of histology which utilized a scale from 0 to 3 in ascending order of damage. Results Both time post-irradiation and strain (BALB/c vs C57BL/6) were significant factors affecting radiation necrosis development. Sex was in general not a statistically significant parameter in terms of radiation necrosis development. Conclusion Mouse strain thus needs to be considered when evaluating the results of necrosis models. However, sex does not appear to be a variable needing major consideration.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T04:20:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6554069a10a04607b9f8730c9caeb8ff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-717X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T04:20:50Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj.art-6554069a10a04607b9f8730c9caeb8ff2022-12-21T23:17:22ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2020-06-011511710.1186/s13014-020-01585-5Impact of mouse strain and sex when modeling radiation necrosisAndrew J. Boria0Carlos J. Perez-Torres1School of Health Sciences, Purdue UniversitySchool of Health Sciences, Purdue UniversityAbstract Background Murine models are among the most common type of preclinical animal models used to study the human condition, but a wide selection of different mice is currently in use with these differences potentially compromising study results and impairing the ability to reconcile interstudy results. Our goal was to determine how the strain and sex of the mice selection would affect the development of radiation necrosis in our murine model of radiation-induced cerebral necrosis. Methods We generated this model by using a preclinical irradiator to irradiate a sub-hemispheric portion of the brain of mice with single-fraction doses of 80 Gy. Eight possible combinations of mice made up of two different with two substrains each (BALB/cN, BALB/cJ, C57BL/6 N, and C57BL/6 J) and both sexes were irradiated in this study. Radiation necrosis development was tracked up to 8 weeks with a 7 T Bruker MRI utilizing T2-weighted and post-contrast T1-weighted imaging. MRI results were compared to and validated with the use of histology which utilized a scale from 0 to 3 in ascending order of damage. Results Both time post-irradiation and strain (BALB/c vs C57BL/6) were significant factors affecting radiation necrosis development. Sex was in general not a statistically significant parameter in terms of radiation necrosis development. Conclusion Mouse strain thus needs to be considered when evaluating the results of necrosis models. However, sex does not appear to be a variable needing major consideration.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-020-01585-5Radiation necrosisSex as a biological variableMouse strainAnimal models
spellingShingle Andrew J. Boria
Carlos J. Perez-Torres
Impact of mouse strain and sex when modeling radiation necrosis
Radiation Oncology
Radiation necrosis
Sex as a biological variable
Mouse strain
Animal models
title Impact of mouse strain and sex when modeling radiation necrosis
title_full Impact of mouse strain and sex when modeling radiation necrosis
title_fullStr Impact of mouse strain and sex when modeling radiation necrosis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of mouse strain and sex when modeling radiation necrosis
title_short Impact of mouse strain and sex when modeling radiation necrosis
title_sort impact of mouse strain and sex when modeling radiation necrosis
topic Radiation necrosis
Sex as a biological variable
Mouse strain
Animal models
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-020-01585-5
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewjboria impactofmousestrainandsexwhenmodelingradiationnecrosis
AT carlosjpereztorres impactofmousestrainandsexwhenmodelingradiationnecrosis