Development of a low-cost congenital abdominal wall defect simulator (wall-go) for undergraduate medical education: a validation study
Abstract Background Congenital Anomalies were responsible for 303,000 deaths in the neonatal period, according to the WHO, they are among the world’s top 20 causes of morbidity and mortality. Expensive simulators demonstrate several diseases, but few are related to congenital anomalies. This study a...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2023-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04929-3 |
_version_ | 1797388267796037632 |
---|---|
author | Gabriel Araújo Medeiros Igor José Nogueira Gualberto Carlos Henrique Nascimento Domingues da Silva Ana Maria Bicudo Diniz Jan Beatriz Felinto de Santana Fábio Perecin Volpe Rahul Gadde Alessandra Mazzo Rodrigo Cardoso de Oliveira Lourenço Sbragia |
author_facet | Gabriel Araújo Medeiros Igor José Nogueira Gualberto Carlos Henrique Nascimento Domingues da Silva Ana Maria Bicudo Diniz Jan Beatriz Felinto de Santana Fábio Perecin Volpe Rahul Gadde Alessandra Mazzo Rodrigo Cardoso de Oliveira Lourenço Sbragia |
author_sort | Gabriel Araújo Medeiros |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Congenital Anomalies were responsible for 303,000 deaths in the neonatal period, according to the WHO, they are among the world’s top 20 causes of morbidity and mortality. Expensive simulators demonstrate several diseases, but few are related to congenital anomalies. This study aims to develop, validate, and evaluate low-cost simulator models (WALL-GO) of the most common abdominal wall defects, gastroschisis, and omphalocele, to enable diagnosis through an accessible tool with study value and amenable to replication. Methods Market research was conducted to find materials to build low-cost models. The researchers built the model and underwent validation assessment of the selected experts who scored five or more in the adapted Fehring criteria. The experts were assessed through a 5-point Likert scale to 7 statements (S1-7). Statements were assigned values according to relevance in face and transfer validities. Concomitantly, the model was also evaluated by students from 1st to 5th year with the same instruments. Content Validity Indexes (CVIs) were considered validated between groups with concordance greater than 90%. Text feedback was also collected. Each statement was subjected to Fisher’s Exact Test. Results Gastroschisis and omphalocele model costs were US $15 and US $27, respectively. In total, there were 105 simulator evaluators. 15 experts were selected. Of the 90 students, there were 16 (1st year), 22 (2nd), 16 (3rd), 22 (4th), and 14 (5th). Students and experts obtained CVI = 96.4% and 94.6%, respectively. The CVIs of each statement were not significantly different between groups (p < 0,05). Conclusions The WALL-GO models are suitable for use and replicable at a manufacturable low cost. Mannequins with abdominal wall defects are helpful in learning to diagnose and can be applied in teaching and training health professionals in developing and low-income countries. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T22:37:20Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-655d9a3edb6c4700ae5757ba95927cd8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1472-6920 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T22:37:20Z |
publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Medical Education |
spelling | doaj.art-655d9a3edb6c4700ae5757ba95927cd82023-12-17T12:21:01ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202023-12-0123111010.1186/s12909-023-04929-3Development of a low-cost congenital abdominal wall defect simulator (wall-go) for undergraduate medical education: a validation studyGabriel Araújo Medeiros0Igor José Nogueira Gualberto1Carlos Henrique Nascimento Domingues da Silva2Ana Maria Bicudo Diniz3Jan Beatriz Felinto de Santana4Fábio Perecin Volpe5Rahul Gadde6Alessandra Mazzo7Rodrigo Cardoso de Oliveira8Lourenço Sbragia9Bauru Medical School, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics, and Public Health, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São PauloBauru Medical School, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics, and Public Health, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São PauloRecife Medical School, Federal University of PernambucoDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São PauloNursing Course, Unifacisa University CenterDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São PauloDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children’s HospitalBauru Medical School, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics, and Public Health, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São PauloDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São PauloDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São PauloAbstract Background Congenital Anomalies were responsible for 303,000 deaths in the neonatal period, according to the WHO, they are among the world’s top 20 causes of morbidity and mortality. Expensive simulators demonstrate several diseases, but few are related to congenital anomalies. This study aims to develop, validate, and evaluate low-cost simulator models (WALL-GO) of the most common abdominal wall defects, gastroschisis, and omphalocele, to enable diagnosis through an accessible tool with study value and amenable to replication. Methods Market research was conducted to find materials to build low-cost models. The researchers built the model and underwent validation assessment of the selected experts who scored five or more in the adapted Fehring criteria. The experts were assessed through a 5-point Likert scale to 7 statements (S1-7). Statements were assigned values according to relevance in face and transfer validities. Concomitantly, the model was also evaluated by students from 1st to 5th year with the same instruments. Content Validity Indexes (CVIs) were considered validated between groups with concordance greater than 90%. Text feedback was also collected. Each statement was subjected to Fisher’s Exact Test. Results Gastroschisis and omphalocele model costs were US $15 and US $27, respectively. In total, there were 105 simulator evaluators. 15 experts were selected. Of the 90 students, there were 16 (1st year), 22 (2nd), 16 (3rd), 22 (4th), and 14 (5th). Students and experts obtained CVI = 96.4% and 94.6%, respectively. The CVIs of each statement were not significantly different between groups (p < 0,05). Conclusions The WALL-GO models are suitable for use and replicable at a manufacturable low cost. Mannequins with abdominal wall defects are helpful in learning to diagnose and can be applied in teaching and training health professionals in developing and low-income countries.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04929-3Simulation TrainingValidation studyLow-cost technologyGastrointestinal systemCostUndergraduate |
spellingShingle | Gabriel Araújo Medeiros Igor José Nogueira Gualberto Carlos Henrique Nascimento Domingues da Silva Ana Maria Bicudo Diniz Jan Beatriz Felinto de Santana Fábio Perecin Volpe Rahul Gadde Alessandra Mazzo Rodrigo Cardoso de Oliveira Lourenço Sbragia Development of a low-cost congenital abdominal wall defect simulator (wall-go) for undergraduate medical education: a validation study BMC Medical Education Simulation Training Validation study Low-cost technology Gastrointestinal system Cost Undergraduate |
title | Development of a low-cost congenital abdominal wall defect simulator (wall-go) for undergraduate medical education: a validation study |
title_full | Development of a low-cost congenital abdominal wall defect simulator (wall-go) for undergraduate medical education: a validation study |
title_fullStr | Development of a low-cost congenital abdominal wall defect simulator (wall-go) for undergraduate medical education: a validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a low-cost congenital abdominal wall defect simulator (wall-go) for undergraduate medical education: a validation study |
title_short | Development of a low-cost congenital abdominal wall defect simulator (wall-go) for undergraduate medical education: a validation study |
title_sort | development of a low cost congenital abdominal wall defect simulator wall go for undergraduate medical education a validation study |
topic | Simulation Training Validation study Low-cost technology Gastrointestinal system Cost Undergraduate |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04929-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gabrielaraujomedeiros developmentofalowcostcongenitalabdominalwalldefectsimulatorwallgoforundergraduatemedicaleducationavalidationstudy AT igorjosenogueiragualberto developmentofalowcostcongenitalabdominalwalldefectsimulatorwallgoforundergraduatemedicaleducationavalidationstudy AT carloshenriquenascimentodominguesdasilva developmentofalowcostcongenitalabdominalwalldefectsimulatorwallgoforundergraduatemedicaleducationavalidationstudy AT anamariabicudodiniz developmentofalowcostcongenitalabdominalwalldefectsimulatorwallgoforundergraduatemedicaleducationavalidationstudy AT janbeatrizfelintodesantana developmentofalowcostcongenitalabdominalwalldefectsimulatorwallgoforundergraduatemedicaleducationavalidationstudy AT fabioperecinvolpe developmentofalowcostcongenitalabdominalwalldefectsimulatorwallgoforundergraduatemedicaleducationavalidationstudy AT rahulgadde developmentofalowcostcongenitalabdominalwalldefectsimulatorwallgoforundergraduatemedicaleducationavalidationstudy AT alessandramazzo developmentofalowcostcongenitalabdominalwalldefectsimulatorwallgoforundergraduatemedicaleducationavalidationstudy AT rodrigocardosodeoliveira developmentofalowcostcongenitalabdominalwalldefectsimulatorwallgoforundergraduatemedicaleducationavalidationstudy AT lourencosbragia developmentofalowcostcongenitalabdominalwalldefectsimulatorwallgoforundergraduatemedicaleducationavalidationstudy |