Skin prick test is more useful than specific IgE for diagnosis of buckwheat allergy: A retrospective cross-sectional study

Background: Buckwheat (BW) is a potentially life-threatening allergen. Usefulness of BW-specific immunoglobulin-E (BW-sIgE) level for diagnosis of BW allergy is controversial, while the skin prick test (SPT) is widely used because of its less invasive procedure and immediate results. However, there...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noriyuki Yanagida, Sakura Sato, Kyohei Takahashi, Ken-ichi Nagakura, Kiyotake Ogura, Tomoyuki Asaumi, Motohiro Ebisawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-01-01
Series:Allergology International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1323893017300461
_version_ 1819265044606615552
author Noriyuki Yanagida
Sakura Sato
Kyohei Takahashi
Ken-ichi Nagakura
Kiyotake Ogura
Tomoyuki Asaumi
Motohiro Ebisawa
author_facet Noriyuki Yanagida
Sakura Sato
Kyohei Takahashi
Ken-ichi Nagakura
Kiyotake Ogura
Tomoyuki Asaumi
Motohiro Ebisawa
author_sort Noriyuki Yanagida
collection DOAJ
description Background: Buckwheat (BW) is a potentially life-threatening allergen. Usefulness of BW-specific immunoglobulin-E (BW-sIgE) level for diagnosis of BW allergy is controversial, while the skin prick test (SPT) is widely used because of its less invasive procedure and immediate results. However, there are no data comparing usefulness of the SPT and BW-sIgE level. Therefore, our study aimed to clarify efficacy of the SPT for diagnosis of BW allergy. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated patients who underwent an oral food challenge (OFC) for diagnosis or confirmation of acquired tolerance using 3072 mg of BW protein between July 2006 and April 2014. We then compared the diagnostic performance of BW sIgE and SPT to predict positive OFC results. Results: We analyzed 126 patients aged 2–16 years (median, 7.7 years), 18 (14%) of whom showed positive OFC results. Between patients with positive and negative OFC results, there was no significant difference in BW-sIgE level. However, patients with positive OFC results had a larger SPT wheal diameter. Area under the curve for positive OFC results for BW-sIgE level and SPT wheal diameter were 0.583 and 0.791, respectively. The 5%, 10%, 50%, and 90% positive predictive values of SPT wheal diameter were 2.0 mm, 5.2 mm, 14.7 mm, and 24.1 mm, respectively. Conclusions: Our study revealed that the SPT was more useful than BW-sIgE level for diagnosis of BW allergy. Thus, an OFC may be avoided if the patient's SPT wheal diameter is at least 24.1 mm.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T20:39:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6579c5274805411189cc8a82550176b1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1323-8930
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T20:39:07Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Allergology International
spelling doaj.art-6579c5274805411189cc8a82550176b12022-12-21T17:31:58ZengElsevierAllergology International1323-89302018-01-01671677110.1016/j.alit.2017.04.005Skin prick test is more useful than specific IgE for diagnosis of buckwheat allergy: A retrospective cross-sectional studyNoriyuki Yanagida0Sakura Sato1Kyohei Takahashi2Ken-ichi Nagakura3Kiyotake Ogura4Tomoyuki Asaumi5Motohiro Ebisawa6Department of Pediatrics, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Pediatrics, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Pediatrics, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Pediatrics, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Pediatrics, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, JapanDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, JapanBackground: Buckwheat (BW) is a potentially life-threatening allergen. Usefulness of BW-specific immunoglobulin-E (BW-sIgE) level for diagnosis of BW allergy is controversial, while the skin prick test (SPT) is widely used because of its less invasive procedure and immediate results. However, there are no data comparing usefulness of the SPT and BW-sIgE level. Therefore, our study aimed to clarify efficacy of the SPT for diagnosis of BW allergy. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated patients who underwent an oral food challenge (OFC) for diagnosis or confirmation of acquired tolerance using 3072 mg of BW protein between July 2006 and April 2014. We then compared the diagnostic performance of BW sIgE and SPT to predict positive OFC results. Results: We analyzed 126 patients aged 2–16 years (median, 7.7 years), 18 (14%) of whom showed positive OFC results. Between patients with positive and negative OFC results, there was no significant difference in BW-sIgE level. However, patients with positive OFC results had a larger SPT wheal diameter. Area under the curve for positive OFC results for BW-sIgE level and SPT wheal diameter were 0.583 and 0.791, respectively. The 5%, 10%, 50%, and 90% positive predictive values of SPT wheal diameter were 2.0 mm, 5.2 mm, 14.7 mm, and 24.1 mm, respectively. Conclusions: Our study revealed that the SPT was more useful than BW-sIgE level for diagnosis of BW allergy. Thus, an OFC may be avoided if the patient's SPT wheal diameter is at least 24.1 mm.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1323893017300461AnaphylaxisBuckwheatFood allergyFood hypersensitivityImmunoglobulin E
spellingShingle Noriyuki Yanagida
Sakura Sato
Kyohei Takahashi
Ken-ichi Nagakura
Kiyotake Ogura
Tomoyuki Asaumi
Motohiro Ebisawa
Skin prick test is more useful than specific IgE for diagnosis of buckwheat allergy: A retrospective cross-sectional study
Allergology International
Anaphylaxis
Buckwheat
Food allergy
Food hypersensitivity
Immunoglobulin E
title Skin prick test is more useful than specific IgE for diagnosis of buckwheat allergy: A retrospective cross-sectional study
title_full Skin prick test is more useful than specific IgE for diagnosis of buckwheat allergy: A retrospective cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Skin prick test is more useful than specific IgE for diagnosis of buckwheat allergy: A retrospective cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Skin prick test is more useful than specific IgE for diagnosis of buckwheat allergy: A retrospective cross-sectional study
title_short Skin prick test is more useful than specific IgE for diagnosis of buckwheat allergy: A retrospective cross-sectional study
title_sort skin prick test is more useful than specific ige for diagnosis of buckwheat allergy a retrospective cross sectional study
topic Anaphylaxis
Buckwheat
Food allergy
Food hypersensitivity
Immunoglobulin E
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1323893017300461
work_keys_str_mv AT noriyukiyanagida skinpricktestismoreusefulthanspecificigefordiagnosisofbuckwheatallergyaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT sakurasato skinpricktestismoreusefulthanspecificigefordiagnosisofbuckwheatallergyaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT kyoheitakahashi skinpricktestismoreusefulthanspecificigefordiagnosisofbuckwheatallergyaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT kenichinagakura skinpricktestismoreusefulthanspecificigefordiagnosisofbuckwheatallergyaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT kiyotakeogura skinpricktestismoreusefulthanspecificigefordiagnosisofbuckwheatallergyaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT tomoyukiasaumi skinpricktestismoreusefulthanspecificigefordiagnosisofbuckwheatallergyaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT motohiroebisawa skinpricktestismoreusefulthanspecificigefordiagnosisofbuckwheatallergyaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy