Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping review

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has required educators to adapt the in-person objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to online settings in order for it to remain a critical component of the multifaceted assessment of a student’s competency. This systematic scoping review a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan Zachary Felthun, Silas Taylor, Boaz Shulruf, Digby Wigram Allen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jeehp.org/upload/jeehp-18-11.pdf
_version_ 1797760286881480704
author Jonathan Zachary Felthun
Silas Taylor
Boaz Shulruf
Digby Wigram Allen
author_facet Jonathan Zachary Felthun
Silas Taylor
Boaz Shulruf
Digby Wigram Allen
author_sort Jonathan Zachary Felthun
collection DOAJ
description The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has required educators to adapt the in-person objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to online settings in order for it to remain a critical component of the multifaceted assessment of a student’s competency. This systematic scoping review aimed to summarize the assessment methods and validity and reliability of the measurement tools used in current online OSCE (hereafter, referred to as teleOSCE) approaches. A comprehensive literature review was undertaken following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Articles were eligible if they reported any form of performance assessment, in any field of healthcare, delivered in an online format. Two reviewers independently screened the results and analyzed relevant studies. Eleven articles were included in the analysis. Pre-recorded videos were used in 3 studies, while observations by remote examiners through an online platform were used in 7 studies. Acceptability as perceived by students was reported in 2 studies. This systematic scoping review identified several insights garnered from implementing teleOSCEs, the components transferable from telemedicine, and the need for systemic research to establish the ideal teleOSCE framework. TeleOSCEs may be able to improve the accessibility and reproducibility of clinical assessments and equip students with the requisite skills to effectively practice telemedicine in the future.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T18:56:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-658b49a25c234d49a30c795ec4e31e3f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1975-5937
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T18:56:25Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute
record_format Article
series Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
spelling doaj.art-658b49a25c234d49a30c795ec4e31e3f2023-08-02T06:49:05ZengKorea Health Personnel Licensing Examination InstituteJournal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions1975-59372021-06-011810.3352/jeehp.2021.18.11403Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping reviewJonathan Zachary Felthun0Silas Taylor1Boaz Shulruf2Digby Wigram Allen3School of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, AustraliaOffice of Medical Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaOffice of Medical Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaSchool of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, AustraliaThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has required educators to adapt the in-person objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to online settings in order for it to remain a critical component of the multifaceted assessment of a student’s competency. This systematic scoping review aimed to summarize the assessment methods and validity and reliability of the measurement tools used in current online OSCE (hereafter, referred to as teleOSCE) approaches. A comprehensive literature review was undertaken following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Articles were eligible if they reported any form of performance assessment, in any field of healthcare, delivered in an online format. Two reviewers independently screened the results and analyzed relevant studies. Eleven articles were included in the analysis. Pre-recorded videos were used in 3 studies, while observations by remote examiners through an online platform were used in 7 studies. Acceptability as perceived by students was reported in 2 studies. This systematic scoping review identified several insights garnered from implementing teleOSCEs, the components transferable from telemedicine, and the need for systemic research to establish the ideal teleOSCE framework. TeleOSCEs may be able to improve the accessibility and reproducibility of clinical assessments and equip students with the requisite skills to effectively practice telemedicine in the future.http://www.jeehp.org/upload/jeehp-18-11.pdfaustraliacovid-19objective structured clinical examinationonline assessmenteducational technology
spellingShingle Jonathan Zachary Felthun
Silas Taylor
Boaz Shulruf
Digby Wigram Allen
Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping review
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
australia
covid-19
objective structured clinical examination
online assessment
educational technology
title Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping review
title_full Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping review
title_fullStr Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping review
title_short Assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations: a systematic scoping review
title_sort assessment methods and the validity and reliability of measurement tools in online objective structured clinical examinations a systematic scoping review
topic australia
covid-19
objective structured clinical examination
online assessment
educational technology
url http://www.jeehp.org/upload/jeehp-18-11.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanzacharyfelthun assessmentmethodsandthevalidityandreliabilityofmeasurementtoolsinonlineobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationsasystematicscopingreview
AT silastaylor assessmentmethodsandthevalidityandreliabilityofmeasurementtoolsinonlineobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationsasystematicscopingreview
AT boazshulruf assessmentmethodsandthevalidityandreliabilityofmeasurementtoolsinonlineobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationsasystematicscopingreview
AT digbywigramallen assessmentmethodsandthevalidityandreliabilityofmeasurementtoolsinonlineobjectivestructuredclinicalexaminationsasystematicscopingreview