Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology Fails to Be Tripartite: A Conceptual Critique of the Scientocentrism in Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology
This paper criticises evidence-based practice in psychology (EBPP) for not actually being a tripartite model. According to the American Psychological Association, EBPP is defined as the integration of the best available research with clinical expertise in the context of patient characteristics, cult...
Main Author: | Henrik Berg |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02253/full |
Similar Items
-
Virtue Ethics and Integration in Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology
by: Henrik Berg
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Why Only Efficiency, and Not Efficacy, Matters in Psychotherapy Practice
by: Henrik Berg, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Methodological Problems of Evidence-Based Description of Psychological and Social Practices
by: Garifulina E.S., et al.
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Developing and delivering practice-based evidence : a guide for the psychological therapies /
by: Barkham, Michael, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Environmental evidence in action: on the science and practice of evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision-making
by: Steven J. Cooke, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)