How to make more humane life imprisonment ("lock up and throw away the key" concept): On the examples of Italy and the Netherlands

The author criticizes the concept of whole life sentence from the aspect of the European standards of protection of the rights of persons deprived of their liberty. The aim of the paper is to contribute scientific critique of new solutions on life imprisonment in Serbian Criminal legislations, becau...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mrvić-Petrović Nataša V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Comparative Law, Belgrade 2022-01-01
Series:Strani pravni život
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0039-2138/2022/0039-21382203403M.pdf
_version_ 1811190844681617408
author Mrvić-Petrović Nataša V.
author_facet Mrvić-Petrović Nataša V.
author_sort Mrvić-Petrović Nataša V.
collection DOAJ
description The author criticizes the concept of whole life sentence from the aspect of the European standards of protection of the rights of persons deprived of their liberty. The aim of the paper is to contribute scientific critique of new solutions on life imprisonment in Serbian Criminal legislations, because the life imprisonment was introduced in 2019, but the conditions on serving the sentence are not prescribed. Conditional release of convict for certain serious crimes are forbidden. On the contrary, the relevant acts of the Council of Europe and the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) show that the principle of social reintegration of offenders must be ensured in the national enforcement system, otherwise there is a risk of violating Art. 3 of the European Convention. The state has an obligation to include lifelong prisoners in prison rehabilitation programs, as well as establish and use mechanism to reduce sentences. Using examples from Italy and the Netherlands, the author examines the circumstances due to which the standards of ECHR of execution of life imprisonment in those countries have not been reached. In that way, the attention of the legislator in Serbia is drawn to the fact that the principle of effective offender's rehabilitation (also his right of rehabilitation) must not be neglected even when the crime needs to be reacted to the strongest sanctions, with a lifelong imprisonment.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T14:56:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-65b3d37811c34d4cbeba8109935526bf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0039-2138
2620-1127
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T14:56:07Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Institute of Comparative Law, Belgrade
record_format Article
series Strani pravni život
spelling doaj.art-65b3d37811c34d4cbeba8109935526bf2022-12-22T04:17:14ZengInstitute of Comparative Law, BelgradeStrani pravni život0039-21382620-11272022-01-012022340342810.56461/SPZ_22304KJ0039-21382203403MHow to make more humane life imprisonment ("lock up and throw away the key" concept): On the examples of Italy and the NetherlandsMrvić-Petrović Nataša V.0Instituta za uporedno pravo, Beograd, SerbiaThe author criticizes the concept of whole life sentence from the aspect of the European standards of protection of the rights of persons deprived of their liberty. The aim of the paper is to contribute scientific critique of new solutions on life imprisonment in Serbian Criminal legislations, because the life imprisonment was introduced in 2019, but the conditions on serving the sentence are not prescribed. Conditional release of convict for certain serious crimes are forbidden. On the contrary, the relevant acts of the Council of Europe and the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) show that the principle of social reintegration of offenders must be ensured in the national enforcement system, otherwise there is a risk of violating Art. 3 of the European Convention. The state has an obligation to include lifelong prisoners in prison rehabilitation programs, as well as establish and use mechanism to reduce sentences. Using examples from Italy and the Netherlands, the author examines the circumstances due to which the standards of ECHR of execution of life imprisonment in those countries have not been reached. In that way, the attention of the legislator in Serbia is drawn to the fact that the principle of effective offender's rehabilitation (also his right of rehabilitation) must not be neglected even when the crime needs to be reacted to the strongest sanctions, with a lifelong imprisonment.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0039-2138/2022/0039-21382203403M.pdfwhole life imprisonmentlife imprisonmenttorture and inhuman treatmentconditional release
spellingShingle Mrvić-Petrović Nataša V.
How to make more humane life imprisonment ("lock up and throw away the key" concept): On the examples of Italy and the Netherlands
Strani pravni život
whole life imprisonment
life imprisonment
torture and inhuman treatment
conditional release
title How to make more humane life imprisonment ("lock up and throw away the key" concept): On the examples of Italy and the Netherlands
title_full How to make more humane life imprisonment ("lock up and throw away the key" concept): On the examples of Italy and the Netherlands
title_fullStr How to make more humane life imprisonment ("lock up and throw away the key" concept): On the examples of Italy and the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed How to make more humane life imprisonment ("lock up and throw away the key" concept): On the examples of Italy and the Netherlands
title_short How to make more humane life imprisonment ("lock up and throw away the key" concept): On the examples of Italy and the Netherlands
title_sort how to make more humane life imprisonment lock up and throw away the key concept on the examples of italy and the netherlands
topic whole life imprisonment
life imprisonment
torture and inhuman treatment
conditional release
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0039-2138/2022/0039-21382203403M.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mrvicpetrovicnatasav howtomakemorehumanelifeimprisonmentlockupandthrowawaythekeyconceptontheexamplesofitalyandthenetherlands