The Write Way to Spell: Printing versus Typing Effects on Orthographic Learning

Prior research has shown superior orthographic learning resulting from spelling practice relative to repeated reading. One mechanism proposed to underlie this advantage of spelling in establishing detailed orthographic representations in memory is the motoric component of the manual movements evoked...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gene eOuellette, Talisa eTims
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00117/full
_version_ 1828532097863647232
author Gene eOuellette
Talisa eTims
author_facet Gene eOuellette
Talisa eTims
author_sort Gene eOuellette
collection DOAJ
description Prior research has shown superior orthographic learning resulting from spelling practice relative to repeated reading. One mechanism proposed to underlie this advantage of spelling in establishing detailed orthographic representations in memory is the motoric component of the manual movements evoked in printing or writing. This study investigated this contention directly by testing the effects of typing versus printing on the orthographic learning achieved through spelling practice, and further evaluated whether practice modality interacts with pre-existing individual characteristics. 40 students in grade 2 (mean age 7 years 5 months) were introduced to 10 novel non-words. Some of the students practiced spelling the items by printing, while the others practiced spelling them on a keyboard. Participants were tested for recognition and spelling of these items 1 and 7 days later. Results revealed high rates of orthographic learning with no main effects of practice modality, testing time, or post-test modality. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed an interaction between typing proficiency and practice modality, such that pre-existing keyboarding skills constrained or facilitated learning within the typing-practice group. A similar interaction was not found between printing skills and learning within the printing group. Results are discussed with reference to both prominent reading theory and educational applications.Provisional manuscript of the registered report available <a href=https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/40235309/76085_Van%20't%20Veer_ProvisionalPDF.pdf>here</a>Full manuscript expected summer 2014.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T22:48:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-65e9a0a421484ee7a02ff8e752ee8a45
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T22:48:26Z
publishDate 2014-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-65e9a0a421484ee7a02ff8e752ee8a452022-12-22T00:47:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-02-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.0011775878The Write Way to Spell: Printing versus Typing Effects on Orthographic LearningGene eOuellette0Talisa eTims1Mount Allison UniversityDalhousie UniversityPrior research has shown superior orthographic learning resulting from spelling practice relative to repeated reading. One mechanism proposed to underlie this advantage of spelling in establishing detailed orthographic representations in memory is the motoric component of the manual movements evoked in printing or writing. This study investigated this contention directly by testing the effects of typing versus printing on the orthographic learning achieved through spelling practice, and further evaluated whether practice modality interacts with pre-existing individual characteristics. 40 students in grade 2 (mean age 7 years 5 months) were introduced to 10 novel non-words. Some of the students practiced spelling the items by printing, while the others practiced spelling them on a keyboard. Participants were tested for recognition and spelling of these items 1 and 7 days later. Results revealed high rates of orthographic learning with no main effects of practice modality, testing time, or post-test modality. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed an interaction between typing proficiency and practice modality, such that pre-existing keyboarding skills constrained or facilitated learning within the typing-practice group. A similar interaction was not found between printing skills and learning within the printing group. Results are discussed with reference to both prominent reading theory and educational applications.Provisional manuscript of the registered report available <a href=https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/40235309/76085_Van%20't%20Veer_ProvisionalPDF.pdf>here</a>Full manuscript expected summer 2014.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00117/fullPrintingreadinglexical representationsliteracyspellingtyping
spellingShingle Gene eOuellette
Talisa eTims
The Write Way to Spell: Printing versus Typing Effects on Orthographic Learning
Frontiers in Psychology
Printing
reading
lexical representations
literacy
spelling
typing
title The Write Way to Spell: Printing versus Typing Effects on Orthographic Learning
title_full The Write Way to Spell: Printing versus Typing Effects on Orthographic Learning
title_fullStr The Write Way to Spell: Printing versus Typing Effects on Orthographic Learning
title_full_unstemmed The Write Way to Spell: Printing versus Typing Effects on Orthographic Learning
title_short The Write Way to Spell: Printing versus Typing Effects on Orthographic Learning
title_sort write way to spell printing versus typing effects on orthographic learning
topic Printing
reading
lexical representations
literacy
spelling
typing
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00117/full
work_keys_str_mv AT geneeouellette thewritewaytospellprintingversustypingeffectsonorthographiclearning
AT talisaetims thewritewaytospellprintingversustypingeffectsonorthographiclearning
AT geneeouellette writewaytospellprintingversustypingeffectsonorthographiclearning
AT talisaetims writewaytospellprintingversustypingeffectsonorthographiclearning