Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Physical Disability Resiliency Scale in a Sample of Chinese With Physical Disability
This study adapted the Physical Disability Resilience Scale (PDRS) to Chinese conditions and evaluated the psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version in individuals with physical disability. A total of 438 individuals with physical disability were included in this study. The PDRS was transl...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.602736/full |
| _version_ | 1819319988106821632 |
|---|---|
| author | Wenjie Duan Wenjie Duan Wenlong Mu Hongxia Xiong |
| author_facet | Wenjie Duan Wenjie Duan Wenlong Mu Hongxia Xiong |
| author_sort | Wenjie Duan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study adapted the Physical Disability Resilience Scale (PDRS) to Chinese conditions and evaluated the psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version in individuals with physical disability. A total of 438 individuals with physical disability were included in this study. The PDRS was translated to Chinese using a backward translation method. Construct validity, internal consistency reliability, and convergent validity were examined. Confirmatory factor analysis failed to replicate the original five-factor structure of the PDRS. After removing the Spirituality factor and an underperformed item (Item 22), exploratory factor analysis yielded four trait factors (i.e., Emotional and Cognitive Strategies, Physical Activity and Diet, Peer Support, and Support from Family and Friends) and a method-effect factor. A correlated trait–correlated method model that included the four trait factors and a method-effect factor reported better model fit than the four-factor model, which did not consider method effects. The four subscales of the revised PDRS showed adequate internal consistency. The convergent validity of the revised PDRS was established by the moderate-to-strong associations between its four subscales and theoretically related constructs. We conclude that the revised PDRS is a reliable and valid measure in assessing resilience among Chinese people with physical disability. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-24T11:12:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-65ea0d057b2e4124af45650b15a5c0d1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1664-1078 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-24T11:12:25Z |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Psychology |
| spelling | doaj.art-65ea0d057b2e4124af45650b15a5c0d12022-12-21T16:58:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-12-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.602736602736Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Physical Disability Resiliency Scale in a Sample of Chinese With Physical DisabilityWenjie Duan0Wenjie Duan1Wenlong Mu2Hongxia Xiong3School of Law and Public Administration, Yibin University, Yibin, ChinaSocial and Public Administration School, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, ChinaSichuan Charity Center, Chengdu, ChinaThis study adapted the Physical Disability Resilience Scale (PDRS) to Chinese conditions and evaluated the psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version in individuals with physical disability. A total of 438 individuals with physical disability were included in this study. The PDRS was translated to Chinese using a backward translation method. Construct validity, internal consistency reliability, and convergent validity were examined. Confirmatory factor analysis failed to replicate the original five-factor structure of the PDRS. After removing the Spirituality factor and an underperformed item (Item 22), exploratory factor analysis yielded four trait factors (i.e., Emotional and Cognitive Strategies, Physical Activity and Diet, Peer Support, and Support from Family and Friends) and a method-effect factor. A correlated trait–correlated method model that included the four trait factors and a method-effect factor reported better model fit than the four-factor model, which did not consider method effects. The four subscales of the revised PDRS showed adequate internal consistency. The convergent validity of the revised PDRS was established by the moderate-to-strong associations between its four subscales and theoretically related constructs. We conclude that the revised PDRS is a reliable and valid measure in assessing resilience among Chinese people with physical disability.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.602736/fullresiliencephysical disability resilience scalepsychological characteristicspeople with physical disabilityChinese |
| spellingShingle | Wenjie Duan Wenjie Duan Wenlong Mu Hongxia Xiong Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Physical Disability Resiliency Scale in a Sample of Chinese With Physical Disability Frontiers in Psychology resilience physical disability resilience scale psychological characteristics people with physical disability Chinese |
| title | Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Physical Disability Resiliency Scale in a Sample of Chinese With Physical Disability |
| title_full | Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Physical Disability Resiliency Scale in a Sample of Chinese With Physical Disability |
| title_fullStr | Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Physical Disability Resiliency Scale in a Sample of Chinese With Physical Disability |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Physical Disability Resiliency Scale in a Sample of Chinese With Physical Disability |
| title_short | Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Physical Disability Resiliency Scale in a Sample of Chinese With Physical Disability |
| title_sort | cross cultural adaptation and validation of the physical disability resiliency scale in a sample of chinese with physical disability |
| topic | resilience physical disability resilience scale psychological characteristics people with physical disability Chinese |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.602736/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wenjieduan crossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthephysicaldisabilityresiliencyscaleinasampleofchinesewithphysicaldisability AT wenjieduan crossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthephysicaldisabilityresiliencyscaleinasampleofchinesewithphysicaldisability AT wenlongmu crossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthephysicaldisabilityresiliencyscaleinasampleofchinesewithphysicaldisability AT hongxiaxiong crossculturaladaptationandvalidationofthephysicaldisabilityresiliencyscaleinasampleofchinesewithphysicaldisability |