Lac Operon Boolean Models: Dynamical Robustness and Alternative Improvements

In Veliz-Cuba and Stigler 2011, Boolean models were proposed for the <i>lac</i> operon in <i>Escherichia coli</i> capable of reproducing the operon being OFF, ON and bistable for three (low, medium and high) and two (low and high) parameters, representing the concentration ra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marco Montalva-Medel, Thomas Ledger, Gonzalo A. Ruz, Eric Goles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Mathematics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/6/600
_version_ 1797541757301293056
author Marco Montalva-Medel
Thomas Ledger
Gonzalo A. Ruz
Eric Goles
author_facet Marco Montalva-Medel
Thomas Ledger
Gonzalo A. Ruz
Eric Goles
author_sort Marco Montalva-Medel
collection DOAJ
description In Veliz-Cuba and Stigler 2011, Boolean models were proposed for the <i>lac</i> operon in <i>Escherichia coli</i> capable of reproducing the operon being OFF, ON and bistable for three (low, medium and high) and two (low and high) parameters, representing the concentration ranges of lactose and glucose, respectively. Of these 6 possible combinations of parameters, 5 produce results that match with the biological experiments of Ozbudak et al., 2004. In the remaining one, the models predict the operon being OFF while biological experiments show a bistable behavior. In this paper, we first explore the robustness of two such models in the sense of how much its attractors change against any deterministic update schedule. We prove mathematically that, in cases where there is no bistability, all the dynamics in both models lack limit cycles while, when bistability appears, one model presents 30% of its dynamics with limit cycles while the other only 23%. Secondly, we propose two alternative improvements consisting of biologically supported modifications; one in which both models match with Ozbudak et al., 2004 in all 6 combinations of parameters and, the other one, where we increase the number of parameters to 9, matching in all these cases with the biological experiments of Ozbudak et al., 2004.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T13:20:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-65f09de53fd54cef96a7875f6c14f7d9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7390
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T13:20:18Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Mathematics
spelling doaj.art-65f09de53fd54cef96a7875f6c14f7d92023-11-21T10:03:11ZengMDPI AGMathematics2227-73902021-03-019660010.3390/math9060600Lac Operon Boolean Models: Dynamical Robustness and Alternative ImprovementsMarco Montalva-Medel0Thomas Ledger1Gonzalo A. Ruz2Eric Goles3Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Av. Diagonal Las Torres 2700, Peñalolén, Santiago 7941169, ChileFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Av. Diagonal Las Torres 2700, Peñalolén, Santiago 7941169, ChileFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Av. Diagonal Las Torres 2700, Peñalolén, Santiago 7941169, ChileFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Av. Diagonal Las Torres 2700, Peñalolén, Santiago 7941169, ChileIn Veliz-Cuba and Stigler 2011, Boolean models were proposed for the <i>lac</i> operon in <i>Escherichia coli</i> capable of reproducing the operon being OFF, ON and bistable for three (low, medium and high) and two (low and high) parameters, representing the concentration ranges of lactose and glucose, respectively. Of these 6 possible combinations of parameters, 5 produce results that match with the biological experiments of Ozbudak et al., 2004. In the remaining one, the models predict the operon being OFF while biological experiments show a bistable behavior. In this paper, we first explore the robustness of two such models in the sense of how much its attractors change against any deterministic update schedule. We prove mathematically that, in cases where there is no bistability, all the dynamics in both models lack limit cycles while, when bistability appears, one model presents 30% of its dynamics with limit cycles while the other only 23%. Secondly, we propose two alternative improvements consisting of biologically supported modifications; one in which both models match with Ozbudak et al., 2004 in all 6 combinations of parameters and, the other one, where we increase the number of parameters to 9, matching in all these cases with the biological experiments of Ozbudak et al., 2004.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/6/600lac operoncatabolite repressionbistabilityBoolean networkdynamicattractor
spellingShingle Marco Montalva-Medel
Thomas Ledger
Gonzalo A. Ruz
Eric Goles
Lac Operon Boolean Models: Dynamical Robustness and Alternative Improvements
Mathematics
lac operon
catabolite repression
bistability
Boolean network
dynamic
attractor
title Lac Operon Boolean Models: Dynamical Robustness and Alternative Improvements
title_full Lac Operon Boolean Models: Dynamical Robustness and Alternative Improvements
title_fullStr Lac Operon Boolean Models: Dynamical Robustness and Alternative Improvements
title_full_unstemmed Lac Operon Boolean Models: Dynamical Robustness and Alternative Improvements
title_short Lac Operon Boolean Models: Dynamical Robustness and Alternative Improvements
title_sort lac operon boolean models dynamical robustness and alternative improvements
topic lac operon
catabolite repression
bistability
Boolean network
dynamic
attractor
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/6/600
work_keys_str_mv AT marcomontalvamedel lacoperonbooleanmodelsdynamicalrobustnessandalternativeimprovements
AT thomasledger lacoperonbooleanmodelsdynamicalrobustnessandalternativeimprovements
AT gonzaloaruz lacoperonbooleanmodelsdynamicalrobustnessandalternativeimprovements
AT ericgoles lacoperonbooleanmodelsdynamicalrobustnessandalternativeimprovements