An analysis of surgical and anaesthetic factors affecting skin graft viability in patients admitted to a Burns Intensive Care Unit

Objectives: Skin graft failure is a recognised complication in the treatment of major burns. Little research to date has analysed the impact of the complex physiological management of burns patients on the success of skin grafting. We analysed surgical and anaesthetic variables to identify factors c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catherine E Isitt, Kayleigh A McCloskey, Alvaro Caballo, Pranev Sharma, Andrew Williams, Jorge Leon-Villapalos, Marcela P Vizcaychipi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-04-01
Series:Scars, Burns & Healing
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513116642089
_version_ 1818112607470485504
author Catherine E Isitt
Kayleigh A McCloskey
Alvaro Caballo
Pranev Sharma
Andrew Williams
Jorge Leon-Villapalos
Marcela P Vizcaychipi
author_facet Catherine E Isitt
Kayleigh A McCloskey
Alvaro Caballo
Pranev Sharma
Andrew Williams
Jorge Leon-Villapalos
Marcela P Vizcaychipi
author_sort Catherine E Isitt
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: Skin graft failure is a recognised complication in the treatment of major burns. Little research to date has analysed the impact of the complex physiological management of burns patients on the success of skin grafting. We analysed surgical and anaesthetic variables to identify factors contributing to graft failure. Methods: Inclusion criteria were admission to our Burns Intensive Care Unit (BICU) between January 2009 and October 2013 with a major burn. After exclusion for death before hospital discharge or prior skin graft at a different hospital, 35 patients remained and were divided into those with successful autografts (n=16) and those with a failed autograft (n=19). For the purposes of this study, we defined poor autograft viability as requiring at least one additional skin graft to the same site. Logistic regression of variables was performed using SPSS (Version 22.0 IBMTM). Results: Age, Sex, %Total Burn Surface Area or Belgian Outcome Burns Injury score did not significantly differ between groups. No differences were found in any surgical factor at logistic regression (graft site, harvest site, infection etc.). When all operations were analysed, the use of colloids was found to be significantly associated with graft failure (p=0.035, CI 95%) and this remained significant when only split thickness skin grafts (STSGs) and debridement operations were included (p=0.034, CI 95%). No differences were found in crystalloid use, intraoperative temperature, pre-operative haemoglobin and blood products or vasopressor use. Conclusions: This analysis highlights an independent association between colloids and graft failure which has not been previously documented.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T03:21:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6619d1f58a15455aabbcb5ed057e9843
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-5131
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T03:21:38Z
publishDate 2016-04-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Scars, Burns & Healing
spelling doaj.art-6619d1f58a15455aabbcb5ed057e98432022-12-22T01:22:37ZengSAGE PublishingScars, Burns & Healing2059-51312016-04-01210.1177/2059513116642089An analysis of surgical and anaesthetic factors affecting skin graft viability in patients admitted to a Burns Intensive Care UnitCatherine E Isitt0Kayleigh A McCloskey1Alvaro Caballo2Pranev Sharma3Andrew Williams4Jorge Leon-Villapalos5Marcela P Vizcaychipi6Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Trust, London SW10 9NH, UKDepartment of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Trust, London SW10 9NH, UKDepartment of Plastics and Burns Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Trust, London SW10 9NH, UKDepartment of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Trust, London SW10 9NH, UKDepartment of Plastics and Burns Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Trust, London SW10 9NH, UKDepartment of Plastics and Burns Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Trust, London SW10 9NH, UKFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UKObjectives: Skin graft failure is a recognised complication in the treatment of major burns. Little research to date has analysed the impact of the complex physiological management of burns patients on the success of skin grafting. We analysed surgical and anaesthetic variables to identify factors contributing to graft failure. Methods: Inclusion criteria were admission to our Burns Intensive Care Unit (BICU) between January 2009 and October 2013 with a major burn. After exclusion for death before hospital discharge or prior skin graft at a different hospital, 35 patients remained and were divided into those with successful autografts (n=16) and those with a failed autograft (n=19). For the purposes of this study, we defined poor autograft viability as requiring at least one additional skin graft to the same site. Logistic regression of variables was performed using SPSS (Version 22.0 IBMTM). Results: Age, Sex, %Total Burn Surface Area or Belgian Outcome Burns Injury score did not significantly differ between groups. No differences were found in any surgical factor at logistic regression (graft site, harvest site, infection etc.). When all operations were analysed, the use of colloids was found to be significantly associated with graft failure (p=0.035, CI 95%) and this remained significant when only split thickness skin grafts (STSGs) and debridement operations were included (p=0.034, CI 95%). No differences were found in crystalloid use, intraoperative temperature, pre-operative haemoglobin and blood products or vasopressor use. Conclusions: This analysis highlights an independent association between colloids and graft failure which has not been previously documented.https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513116642089
spellingShingle Catherine E Isitt
Kayleigh A McCloskey
Alvaro Caballo
Pranev Sharma
Andrew Williams
Jorge Leon-Villapalos
Marcela P Vizcaychipi
An analysis of surgical and anaesthetic factors affecting skin graft viability in patients admitted to a Burns Intensive Care Unit
Scars, Burns & Healing
title An analysis of surgical and anaesthetic factors affecting skin graft viability in patients admitted to a Burns Intensive Care Unit
title_full An analysis of surgical and anaesthetic factors affecting skin graft viability in patients admitted to a Burns Intensive Care Unit
title_fullStr An analysis of surgical and anaesthetic factors affecting skin graft viability in patients admitted to a Burns Intensive Care Unit
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of surgical and anaesthetic factors affecting skin graft viability in patients admitted to a Burns Intensive Care Unit
title_short An analysis of surgical and anaesthetic factors affecting skin graft viability in patients admitted to a Burns Intensive Care Unit
title_sort analysis of surgical and anaesthetic factors affecting skin graft viability in patients admitted to a burns intensive care unit
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513116642089
work_keys_str_mv AT catherineeisitt ananalysisofsurgicalandanaestheticfactorsaffectingskingraftviabilityinpatientsadmittedtoaburnsintensivecareunit
AT kayleighamccloskey ananalysisofsurgicalandanaestheticfactorsaffectingskingraftviabilityinpatientsadmittedtoaburnsintensivecareunit
AT alvarocaballo ananalysisofsurgicalandanaestheticfactorsaffectingskingraftviabilityinpatientsadmittedtoaburnsintensivecareunit
AT pranevsharma ananalysisofsurgicalandanaestheticfactorsaffectingskingraftviabilityinpatientsadmittedtoaburnsintensivecareunit
AT andrewwilliams ananalysisofsurgicalandanaestheticfactorsaffectingskingraftviabilityinpatientsadmittedtoaburnsintensivecareunit
AT jorgeleonvillapalos ananalysisofsurgicalandanaestheticfactorsaffectingskingraftviabilityinpatientsadmittedtoaburnsintensivecareunit
AT marcelapvizcaychipi ananalysisofsurgicalandanaestheticfactorsaffectingskingraftviabilityinpatientsadmittedtoaburnsintensivecareunit
AT catherineeisitt analysisofsurgicalandanaestheticfactorsaffectingskingraftviabilityinpatientsadmittedtoaburnsintensivecareunit
AT kayleighamccloskey analysisofsurgicalandanaestheticfactorsaffectingskingraftviabilityinpatientsadmittedtoaburnsintensivecareunit
AT alvarocaballo analysisofsurgicalandanaestheticfactorsaffectingskingraftviabilityinpatientsadmittedtoaburnsintensivecareunit
AT pranevsharma analysisofsurgicalandanaestheticfactorsaffectingskingraftviabilityinpatientsadmittedtoaburnsintensivecareunit
AT andrewwilliams analysisofsurgicalandanaestheticfactorsaffectingskingraftviabilityinpatientsadmittedtoaburnsintensivecareunit
AT jorgeleonvillapalos analysisofsurgicalandanaestheticfactorsaffectingskingraftviabilityinpatientsadmittedtoaburnsintensivecareunit
AT marcelapvizcaychipi analysisofsurgicalandanaestheticfactorsaffectingskingraftviabilityinpatientsadmittedtoaburnsintensivecareunit