Cachexia index as a potential biomarker for cancer cachexia and a prognostic indicator in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

Abstract Background Cancer cachexia is known to adversely affect the clinical course in patients with malignant lymphoma. The cachexia index (CXI) is a potential biomarker of cancer cachexia, and its implications for the prognosis and treatment outcome of lung cancer and aggressive lymphoma has been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Se‐Il Go, Mi Jung Park, Sungwoo Park, Myoung Hee Kang, Hoon‐Gu Kim, Jung Hun Kang, Jung Hoon Kim, Gyeong‐Won Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-12-01
Series:Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12837
_version_ 1797205354732322816
author Se‐Il Go
Mi Jung Park
Sungwoo Park
Myoung Hee Kang
Hoon‐Gu Kim
Jung Hun Kang
Jung Hoon Kim
Gyeong‐Won Lee
author_facet Se‐Il Go
Mi Jung Park
Sungwoo Park
Myoung Hee Kang
Hoon‐Gu Kim
Jung Hun Kang
Jung Hoon Kim
Gyeong‐Won Lee
author_sort Se‐Il Go
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Cancer cachexia is known to adversely affect the clinical course in patients with malignant lymphoma. The cachexia index (CXI) is a potential biomarker of cancer cachexia, and its implications for the prognosis and treatment outcome of lung cancer and aggressive lymphoma has been assessed in previous studies. Methods A total of 267 patients diagnosed with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma who were treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R‐CHOP) immunochemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. The CXI was calculated as the skeletal muscle index (SMI) × serum albumin/neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Although previous studies measured the SMI using the muscles of the L3 vertebral level, the present study used both the L3 vertebral muscles and the pectoralis muscles (PM) at the T4 vertebral level to measure the SMI. Depending on the type of muscles used, the CXI was termed the L3‐CXI or PM‐CXI. Using sex‐specific cutoff values for CXI, the patients were categorized as follows: (i) high‐CXI group (high L3‐CXI and high PM‐CXI), (ii) intermediate‐CXI group (high L3‐CXI and low PM‐CXI), and (iii) low‐CXI group (low L3‐CXI and low PM‐CXI). Results Complete responses to R‐CHOP were obtained in 145/173 (83.8%), 25/36 (69.4%), and 27/57 (47.4%) patients in the high‐CXI, intermediate‐CXI, and low‐CXI groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Treatment‐related anaemia (15.6%, 30.6%, and 26.3%, P = 0.038), thrombocytopenia (21.4%, 36.1%, and 43.9%, P < 0.001), febrile neutropenia (23.7%, 44.4%, and 36.8%, P = 0.022), and any nonhaematologic toxicity (31.2%, 44.4%, and 54.4%, P = 0.001) of Grade 3 or more were more common in the lower CXI groups than in the higher‐CXI groups. Early treatment discontinuation for reasons other than lymphoma progression also occurred more frequently in the low‐CXI group (24/57, 42.1%) compared with the intermediate‐CXI (5/36, 13.9%) and high‐CXI (18/173, 10.4%) groups (P < 0.001). Median overall survival in the high‐CXI, intermediate‐CXI, and low‐CXI groups was not reached, 50.6 months, and 14.5 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that low CXI was an independent negative prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 2.103, 95% confidence interval 1.278–3.460, P = 0.003). Conclusions We suggest that in patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma, the CXI is a biomarker for cancer cachexia that can predict survival, treatment response, treatment‐related toxicity, and compliance with R‐CHOP. Patients were more clearly stratified by this new CXI category compared with the classifications described in previous studies.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T08:49:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-661b09b74c0f4656a1813ec2894590ad
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2190-5991
2190-6009
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:49:48Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
spelling doaj.art-661b09b74c0f4656a1813ec2894590ad2024-04-16T12:28:16ZengWileyJournal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle2190-59912190-60092021-12-011262211221910.1002/jcsm.12837Cachexia index as a potential biomarker for cancer cachexia and a prognostic indicator in diffuse large B‐cell lymphomaSe‐Il Go0Mi Jung Park1Sungwoo Park2Myoung Hee Kang3Hoon‐Gu Kim4Jung Hun Kang5Jung Hoon Kim6Gyeong‐Won Lee7Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health Science Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine Changwon Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Health Science Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine Jinju Republic of KoreaDivision of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health Science Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine Jinju Republic of KoreaDivision of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health Science Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine Changwon Republic of KoreaDivision of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health Science Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine Changwon Republic of KoreaDivision of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health Science Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine Jinju Republic of KoreaDivision of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health Science Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine Jinju Republic of KoreaDivision of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health Science Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine Jinju Republic of KoreaAbstract Background Cancer cachexia is known to adversely affect the clinical course in patients with malignant lymphoma. The cachexia index (CXI) is a potential biomarker of cancer cachexia, and its implications for the prognosis and treatment outcome of lung cancer and aggressive lymphoma has been assessed in previous studies. Methods A total of 267 patients diagnosed with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma who were treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R‐CHOP) immunochemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. The CXI was calculated as the skeletal muscle index (SMI) × serum albumin/neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Although previous studies measured the SMI using the muscles of the L3 vertebral level, the present study used both the L3 vertebral muscles and the pectoralis muscles (PM) at the T4 vertebral level to measure the SMI. Depending on the type of muscles used, the CXI was termed the L3‐CXI or PM‐CXI. Using sex‐specific cutoff values for CXI, the patients were categorized as follows: (i) high‐CXI group (high L3‐CXI and high PM‐CXI), (ii) intermediate‐CXI group (high L3‐CXI and low PM‐CXI), and (iii) low‐CXI group (low L3‐CXI and low PM‐CXI). Results Complete responses to R‐CHOP were obtained in 145/173 (83.8%), 25/36 (69.4%), and 27/57 (47.4%) patients in the high‐CXI, intermediate‐CXI, and low‐CXI groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Treatment‐related anaemia (15.6%, 30.6%, and 26.3%, P = 0.038), thrombocytopenia (21.4%, 36.1%, and 43.9%, P < 0.001), febrile neutropenia (23.7%, 44.4%, and 36.8%, P = 0.022), and any nonhaematologic toxicity (31.2%, 44.4%, and 54.4%, P = 0.001) of Grade 3 or more were more common in the lower CXI groups than in the higher‐CXI groups. Early treatment discontinuation for reasons other than lymphoma progression also occurred more frequently in the low‐CXI group (24/57, 42.1%) compared with the intermediate‐CXI (5/36, 13.9%) and high‐CXI (18/173, 10.4%) groups (P < 0.001). Median overall survival in the high‐CXI, intermediate‐CXI, and low‐CXI groups was not reached, 50.6 months, and 14.5 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that low CXI was an independent negative prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 2.103, 95% confidence interval 1.278–3.460, P = 0.003). Conclusions We suggest that in patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma, the CXI is a biomarker for cancer cachexia that can predict survival, treatment response, treatment‐related toxicity, and compliance with R‐CHOP. Patients were more clearly stratified by this new CXI category compared with the classifications described in previous studies.https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12837CachexiaSarcopeniaSerum albuminLymphomalarge B‐celldiffuse
spellingShingle Se‐Il Go
Mi Jung Park
Sungwoo Park
Myoung Hee Kang
Hoon‐Gu Kim
Jung Hun Kang
Jung Hoon Kim
Gyeong‐Won Lee
Cachexia index as a potential biomarker for cancer cachexia and a prognostic indicator in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Cachexia
Sarcopenia
Serum albumin
Lymphoma
large B‐cell
diffuse
title Cachexia index as a potential biomarker for cancer cachexia and a prognostic indicator in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma
title_full Cachexia index as a potential biomarker for cancer cachexia and a prognostic indicator in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma
title_fullStr Cachexia index as a potential biomarker for cancer cachexia and a prognostic indicator in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Cachexia index as a potential biomarker for cancer cachexia and a prognostic indicator in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma
title_short Cachexia index as a potential biomarker for cancer cachexia and a prognostic indicator in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma
title_sort cachexia index as a potential biomarker for cancer cachexia and a prognostic indicator in diffuse large b cell lymphoma
topic Cachexia
Sarcopenia
Serum albumin
Lymphoma
large B‐cell
diffuse
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12837
work_keys_str_mv AT seilgo cachexiaindexasapotentialbiomarkerforcancercachexiaandaprognosticindicatorindiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT mijungpark cachexiaindexasapotentialbiomarkerforcancercachexiaandaprognosticindicatorindiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT sungwoopark cachexiaindexasapotentialbiomarkerforcancercachexiaandaprognosticindicatorindiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT myoungheekang cachexiaindexasapotentialbiomarkerforcancercachexiaandaprognosticindicatorindiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT hoongukim cachexiaindexasapotentialbiomarkerforcancercachexiaandaprognosticindicatorindiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT junghunkang cachexiaindexasapotentialbiomarkerforcancercachexiaandaprognosticindicatorindiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT junghoonkim cachexiaindexasapotentialbiomarkerforcancercachexiaandaprognosticindicatorindiffuselargebcelllymphoma
AT gyeongwonlee cachexiaindexasapotentialbiomarkerforcancercachexiaandaprognosticindicatorindiffuselargebcelllymphoma