Tipologii ale evaluării în procesul politicilor publice
<p>The enforcement of the judicial decisions is based on the legality principle, all the proceedings, the authorities entitled to perform in this field, the rights of the participants being provided by the law. The judicial decisions delivered by the administrative courts are enforced by speci...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | ron |
| Published: |
Babes-Bolyai University
2012-06-01
|
| Series: | Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/49 |
| _version_ | 1797218309355077632 |
|---|---|
| author | Dorina ŢICU |
| author_facet | Dorina ŢICU |
| author_sort | Dorina ŢICU |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>The enforcement of the judicial decisions is based on the legality principle, all the proceedings, the authorities entitled to perform in this field, the rights of the participants being provided by the law. The judicial decisions delivered by the administrative courts are enforced by specific regulations, due to the activity of the administrative authorities. The Law no. 554 from 2004 provides a few rules regarding the enforcement of the courts’ decisions and for the rest sends to the Civil procedure code. There are provisions of the New civil procedure code that must be analyzed, because they will apply if they are compatible with the specific administrative rela The article aims to analyze the public policy evaluation process, seen as a part of public policy cycle, based on a comparative quantitative study, in two administrative institutions at the local level. The research aims to identify the characteristics of the evaluation process in relation to the typologies of evaluation, starting from the following operational dimensions: internal evaluation versus external evaluation, administrative evaluation, legal evaluation and political evaluation, prospective or retrospective evaluation, formative versus summative evaluation. Correlating these existing typologies to the level of each public institution, the purpose of the research is to identify the characteristics of the evaluation process, its strengths, and its weaknesses in the space of public administration.tionships. </p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T12:15:42Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6622990e8f0f4f589b2b5a2b445c181d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1454-1378 |
| language | ron |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T12:15:42Z |
| publishDate | 2012-06-01 |
| publisher | Babes-Bolyai University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative |
| spelling | doaj.art-6622990e8f0f4f589b2b5a2b445c181d2024-04-08T08:46:54ZronBabes-Bolyai UniversityRevista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative1454-13782012-06-01143019520849Tipologii ale evaluării în procesul politicilor publiceDorina ŢICU0Cadru didactic asociat drd., Catedra de Ştiinţe Politice şi Relaţii Internaţionale, Facultatea de Filosofie şi Ştiinţe Social-Politice, Universitatea Alexandru Ioan Cuza, Iaşi, România<p>The enforcement of the judicial decisions is based on the legality principle, all the proceedings, the authorities entitled to perform in this field, the rights of the participants being provided by the law. The judicial decisions delivered by the administrative courts are enforced by specific regulations, due to the activity of the administrative authorities. The Law no. 554 from 2004 provides a few rules regarding the enforcement of the courts’ decisions and for the rest sends to the Civil procedure code. There are provisions of the New civil procedure code that must be analyzed, because they will apply if they are compatible with the specific administrative rela The article aims to analyze the public policy evaluation process, seen as a part of public policy cycle, based on a comparative quantitative study, in two administrative institutions at the local level. The research aims to identify the characteristics of the evaluation process in relation to the typologies of evaluation, starting from the following operational dimensions: internal evaluation versus external evaluation, administrative evaluation, legal evaluation and political evaluation, prospective or retrospective evaluation, formative versus summative evaluation. Correlating these existing typologies to the level of each public institution, the purpose of the research is to identify the characteristics of the evaluation process, its strengths, and its weaknesses in the space of public administration.tionships. </p>https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/49public policiesinternal evaluationexternal evaluationprospective evaluationadministrative evaluationpolitical evaluation. |
| spellingShingle | Dorina ŢICU Tipologii ale evaluării în procesul politicilor publice Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative public policies internal evaluation external evaluation prospective evaluation administrative evaluation political evaluation. |
| title | Tipologii ale evaluării în procesul politicilor publice |
| title_full | Tipologii ale evaluării în procesul politicilor publice |
| title_fullStr | Tipologii ale evaluării în procesul politicilor publice |
| title_full_unstemmed | Tipologii ale evaluării în procesul politicilor publice |
| title_short | Tipologii ale evaluării în procesul politicilor publice |
| title_sort | tipologii ale evaluarii in procesul politicilor publice |
| topic | public policies internal evaluation external evaluation prospective evaluation administrative evaluation political evaluation. |
| url | https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/49 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dorinaticu tipologiialeevaluariiinprocesulpoliticilorpublice |