A retrospective study to compare improvement of implant maintenance by Medical Treatment Model
Background: Study comparing the improvement of implant maintenance is limited. Clinicians must be aware of implant maintenance to improve long-term success of implant. Aims: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate whether the Medical Treatment Model (MTM), which is a comprehensive treatm...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Contemporary Clinical Dentistry |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2016;volume=7;issue=4;spage=428;epage=433;aulast=Maruo |
| _version_ | 1811226072756256768 |
|---|---|
| author | Katsuichiro Maruo Kamleshwar Singh Sadahiko Shibata Go Sugiura Takashi Kumagai Katsushi Tamaki Jyoti Jain |
| author_facet | Katsuichiro Maruo Kamleshwar Singh Sadahiko Shibata Go Sugiura Takashi Kumagai Katsushi Tamaki Jyoti Jain |
| author_sort | Katsuichiro Maruo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Study comparing the improvement of implant maintenance is limited. Clinicians must be aware of implant maintenance to improve long-term success of implant. Aims: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate whether the Medical Treatment Model (MTM), which is a comprehensive treatment, includes initial risk assessment, lifestyle instructions, such as diet and habits, and a customized maintenance program to improve implant prognosis. Materials and Methods: Patients who were comprehensively treated were included and divided into two groups, test and control groups. The test group included patients who started treatment with MTM, whereas control group included patients who started treatment without MTM introduction. Moreover, subsequently, compliance with maintenance, occurrence of biological complications, and implant failure were evaluated. Results: About 199 patients with 515 implants were analyzed in the control group and 38 patients with 59 implants in the test group. In the control and test groups, the percentages of patients in the four compliance categories were, respectively, 73.9% and 89.5% for excellent compliance, 7.0% and 7.9% for good compliance, 14.6% and 0% for fair compliance, and 4.5% and 2.6% for poor compliance. There was a statistically significant difference in the compliance with periodontal and implant maintenance between the test and control groups (P = 0.029). Conclusions: Within the limitation of this study, MTM significantly enhanced the compliance of patients treated with implants. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T09:18:13Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6625c36ea3fc4bc9a292e54f620c7595 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0976-237X 0976-2361 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T09:18:13Z |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Contemporary Clinical Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj.art-6625c36ea3fc4bc9a292e54f620c75952022-12-22T03:38:44ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsContemporary Clinical Dentistry0976-237X0976-23612016-01-017442843310.4103/0976-237X.194112A retrospective study to compare improvement of implant maintenance by Medical Treatment ModelKatsuichiro MaruoKamleshwar SinghSadahiko ShibataGo SugiuraTakashi KumagaiKatsushi TamakiJyoti JainBackground: Study comparing the improvement of implant maintenance is limited. Clinicians must be aware of implant maintenance to improve long-term success of implant. Aims: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate whether the Medical Treatment Model (MTM), which is a comprehensive treatment, includes initial risk assessment, lifestyle instructions, such as diet and habits, and a customized maintenance program to improve implant prognosis. Materials and Methods: Patients who were comprehensively treated were included and divided into two groups, test and control groups. The test group included patients who started treatment with MTM, whereas control group included patients who started treatment without MTM introduction. Moreover, subsequently, compliance with maintenance, occurrence of biological complications, and implant failure were evaluated. Results: About 199 patients with 515 implants were analyzed in the control group and 38 patients with 59 implants in the test group. In the control and test groups, the percentages of patients in the four compliance categories were, respectively, 73.9% and 89.5% for excellent compliance, 7.0% and 7.9% for good compliance, 14.6% and 0% for fair compliance, and 4.5% and 2.6% for poor compliance. There was a statistically significant difference in the compliance with periodontal and implant maintenance between the test and control groups (P = 0.029). Conclusions: Within the limitation of this study, MTM significantly enhanced the compliance of patients treated with implants.http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2016;volume=7;issue=4;spage=428;epage=433;aulast=MaruoImplants maintenanceMedical Treatment Modelperi-implantitis |
| spellingShingle | Katsuichiro Maruo Kamleshwar Singh Sadahiko Shibata Go Sugiura Takashi Kumagai Katsushi Tamaki Jyoti Jain A retrospective study to compare improvement of implant maintenance by Medical Treatment Model Contemporary Clinical Dentistry Implants maintenance Medical Treatment Model peri-implantitis |
| title | A retrospective study to compare improvement of implant maintenance by Medical Treatment Model |
| title_full | A retrospective study to compare improvement of implant maintenance by Medical Treatment Model |
| title_fullStr | A retrospective study to compare improvement of implant maintenance by Medical Treatment Model |
| title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective study to compare improvement of implant maintenance by Medical Treatment Model |
| title_short | A retrospective study to compare improvement of implant maintenance by Medical Treatment Model |
| title_sort | retrospective study to compare improvement of implant maintenance by medical treatment model |
| topic | Implants maintenance Medical Treatment Model peri-implantitis |
| url | http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2016;volume=7;issue=4;spage=428;epage=433;aulast=Maruo |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT katsuichiromaruo aretrospectivestudytocompareimprovementofimplantmaintenancebymedicaltreatmentmodel AT kamleshwarsingh aretrospectivestudytocompareimprovementofimplantmaintenancebymedicaltreatmentmodel AT sadahikoshibata aretrospectivestudytocompareimprovementofimplantmaintenancebymedicaltreatmentmodel AT gosugiura aretrospectivestudytocompareimprovementofimplantmaintenancebymedicaltreatmentmodel AT takashikumagai aretrospectivestudytocompareimprovementofimplantmaintenancebymedicaltreatmentmodel AT katsushitamaki aretrospectivestudytocompareimprovementofimplantmaintenancebymedicaltreatmentmodel AT jyotijain aretrospectivestudytocompareimprovementofimplantmaintenancebymedicaltreatmentmodel AT katsuichiromaruo retrospectivestudytocompareimprovementofimplantmaintenancebymedicaltreatmentmodel AT kamleshwarsingh retrospectivestudytocompareimprovementofimplantmaintenancebymedicaltreatmentmodel AT sadahikoshibata retrospectivestudytocompareimprovementofimplantmaintenancebymedicaltreatmentmodel AT gosugiura retrospectivestudytocompareimprovementofimplantmaintenancebymedicaltreatmentmodel AT takashikumagai retrospectivestudytocompareimprovementofimplantmaintenancebymedicaltreatmentmodel AT katsushitamaki retrospectivestudytocompareimprovementofimplantmaintenancebymedicaltreatmentmodel AT jyotijain retrospectivestudytocompareimprovementofimplantmaintenancebymedicaltreatmentmodel |