Judges’ deadlines, deadlines for public administration and associations

In the theory on the activity of the judge in disputes related to exceeding powers, one fundamental principle demands that this activity is ‘beyond time’: the judge examines some past events and objectively seeks whether the administrative act being disputed has been undertaken according to the norm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel Chabanol
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu 2015-01-01
Series:Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/203582
_version_ 1797642434827517952
author Daniel Chabanol
author_facet Daniel Chabanol
author_sort Daniel Chabanol
collection DOAJ
description In the theory on the activity of the judge in disputes related to exceeding powers, one fundamental principle demands that this activity is ‘beyond time’: the judge examines some past events and objectively seeks whether the administrative act being disputed has been undertaken according to the norms which should have been applied, which the judge, if necessary, identifies retroactively (emphasising that s/he does not create them). The claim of the illegality of the administrative act leads to its retroactive revocation and to the reconstruction of what should have been in administrative activity. This theory has not however survived in relation to the principle of reality. The inevitable passing of time, both in public administration and in society resist the ‘beyond time’ aspect of judge activity. This resistance is founded on social expectations and on the principle of legal security. The judge in cases of exceeding powers also responds to the demands on the one hand to become more familiar with the methods of the judge in full adjudication disputes, and on the other hand, to abandon to a certain extent the retroactivity of its intervention. This raises the following question of: is the judge in cases of legality still some kind of ‘general inspector’ of public power or does the judge become a means of appeasing the conflict which occurs in life in general? Similarly, a judge in a dispute on exceeding powers responding to a concrete social demand accepting that revocation, even retroactive, of an administrative act is not always sufficient to reinstate the principle of a country that adheres to the law. That is why, as a deciding criterion in judicial functioning, the concept of the duration of proceedings has been introduced. So, besides the customary damages and the result of consequences caused by the unreasonable duration of proceedings, it has been concluded that new attention be paid to the duration of proceedings. This is not only in relation to legal norms, but also to court practice. Apart from exigent proceedings presented by Jean Massot, it has been concluded that concern exists that an effective and real reaching of an administrative court decision be approached. Moreover, the new dialectic combines this concern with the concern that a bad judgement not be reached merely due to exigency. This has been evidenced by two extreme examples: the legality of banning a play was decided upon in less than two days, what is more both at first instance and appeal level at the same time, and in advance of the time set for the play. Contrarily, over five months was devoted to examining one of the ‘exigent’ proceedings related to the cessation of feeding and artificial dehydration of a patient (decision dated 11 January 2014, decision by State Council 25 June 2014).
first_indexed 2024-03-11T14:01:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-66348fadd0bb48f98546c1f18b19b3cb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0584-9063
1847-0459
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T14:01:14Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu
record_format Article
series Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu
spelling doaj.art-66348fadd0bb48f98546c1f18b19b3cb2023-11-02T04:39:08ZengPravni fakultet Sveučilišta u SplituZbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu0584-90631847-04592015-01-015215159Judges’ deadlines, deadlines for public administration and associationsDaniel ChabanolIn the theory on the activity of the judge in disputes related to exceeding powers, one fundamental principle demands that this activity is ‘beyond time’: the judge examines some past events and objectively seeks whether the administrative act being disputed has been undertaken according to the norms which should have been applied, which the judge, if necessary, identifies retroactively (emphasising that s/he does not create them). The claim of the illegality of the administrative act leads to its retroactive revocation and to the reconstruction of what should have been in administrative activity. This theory has not however survived in relation to the principle of reality. The inevitable passing of time, both in public administration and in society resist the ‘beyond time’ aspect of judge activity. This resistance is founded on social expectations and on the principle of legal security. The judge in cases of exceeding powers also responds to the demands on the one hand to become more familiar with the methods of the judge in full adjudication disputes, and on the other hand, to abandon to a certain extent the retroactivity of its intervention. This raises the following question of: is the judge in cases of legality still some kind of ‘general inspector’ of public power or does the judge become a means of appeasing the conflict which occurs in life in general? Similarly, a judge in a dispute on exceeding powers responding to a concrete social demand accepting that revocation, even retroactive, of an administrative act is not always sufficient to reinstate the principle of a country that adheres to the law. That is why, as a deciding criterion in judicial functioning, the concept of the duration of proceedings has been introduced. So, besides the customary damages and the result of consequences caused by the unreasonable duration of proceedings, it has been concluded that new attention be paid to the duration of proceedings. This is not only in relation to legal norms, but also to court practice. Apart from exigent proceedings presented by Jean Massot, it has been concluded that concern exists that an effective and real reaching of an administrative court decision be approached. Moreover, the new dialectic combines this concern with the concern that a bad judgement not be reached merely due to exigency. This has been evidenced by two extreme examples: the legality of banning a play was decided upon in less than two days, what is more both at first instance and appeal level at the same time, and in advance of the time set for the play. Contrarily, over five months was devoted to examining one of the ‘exigent’ proceedings related to the cessation of feeding and artificial dehydration of a patient (decision dated 11 January 2014, decision by State Council 25 June 2014).http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/203582beyond time judgingtheorypractice Council of State
spellingShingle Daniel Chabanol
Judges’ deadlines, deadlines for public administration and associations
Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu
beyond time judging
theory
practice Council of State
title Judges’ deadlines, deadlines for public administration and associations
title_full Judges’ deadlines, deadlines for public administration and associations
title_fullStr Judges’ deadlines, deadlines for public administration and associations
title_full_unstemmed Judges’ deadlines, deadlines for public administration and associations
title_short Judges’ deadlines, deadlines for public administration and associations
title_sort judges deadlines deadlines for public administration and associations
topic beyond time judging
theory
practice Council of State
url http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/203582
work_keys_str_mv AT danielchabanol judgesdeadlinesdeadlinesforpublicadministrationandassociations