Hot metacognition: poorer metacognitive efficiency following acute but not traumatic stress

Abstract Aberrations to metacognition—the ability to reflect on and evaluate self-performance—are a feature of poor mental health. Theoretical models of post-traumatic stress disorder propose that following severe stress or trauma, maladaptive metacognitive evaluations and appraisals of the event dr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alicia J. Smith, James A. Bisby, Quentin Dercon, Anna Bevan, Stacey L. Kigar, Mary-Ellen Lynall, Tim Dalgleish, Caitlin Hitchcock, Camilla L. Nord
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2024-03-01
Series:Translational Psychiatry
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-02840-z
_version_ 1797273102185398272
author Alicia J. Smith
James A. Bisby
Quentin Dercon
Anna Bevan
Stacey L. Kigar
Mary-Ellen Lynall
Tim Dalgleish
Caitlin Hitchcock
Camilla L. Nord
author_facet Alicia J. Smith
James A. Bisby
Quentin Dercon
Anna Bevan
Stacey L. Kigar
Mary-Ellen Lynall
Tim Dalgleish
Caitlin Hitchcock
Camilla L. Nord
author_sort Alicia J. Smith
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aberrations to metacognition—the ability to reflect on and evaluate self-performance—are a feature of poor mental health. Theoretical models of post-traumatic stress disorder propose that following severe stress or trauma, maladaptive metacognitive evaluations and appraisals of the event drive the development of symptoms. Empirical research is required in order to reveal whether disruptions to metacognition cause or contribute to symptom development in line with theoretical accounts, or are simply a consequence of ongoing psychopathology. In two experiments, using hierarchical Bayesian modelling of metacognition measured in a memory recognition task, we assessed whether distortions to metacognition occur at a state-level after an acute stress induction, and/or at a trait-level in a sample of individuals experiencing intrusive memories following traumatic stress. Results from experiment 1, an in-person laboratory-based experiment, demonstrated that heightened psychological responses to the stress induction were associated with poorer metacognitive efficiency, despite there being no overall change in metacognitive efficiency from pre- to post-stress (N = 27). Conversely, in experiment 2, an online experiment using the same metamemory task, we did not find evidence of metacognitive alterations in a transdiagnostic sample of patients with intrusive memory symptomatology following traumatic stress (N = 36, compared to 44 matched controls). Our results indicate a relationship between state-level psychological responses to stress and metacognitive alterations. The lack of evidence for pre- to post-stress differences in metamemory illustrates the importance for future studies to reveal the direction of this relationship, and consequently the duration of stress-associated metacognitive impairments and their impact on mental health.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:39:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-663c31ef9658482f9417517255941cac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2158-3188
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:39:44Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Translational Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-663c31ef9658482f9417517255941cac2024-03-05T20:26:53ZengNature Publishing GroupTranslational Psychiatry2158-31882024-03-0114111210.1038/s41398-024-02840-zHot metacognition: poorer metacognitive efficiency following acute but not traumatic stressAlicia J. Smith0James A. Bisby1Quentin Dercon2Anna Bevan3Stacey L. Kigar4Mary-Ellen Lynall5Tim Dalgleish6Caitlin Hitchcock7Camilla L. Nord8MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of CambridgeDivision of Psychiatry, University College LondonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of CambridgeMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of CambridgeDepartment of Psychiatry, Herchel Smith Building of Brain & Mind Sciences, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of CambridgeDepartment of Psychiatry, Herchel Smith Building of Brain & Mind Sciences, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of CambridgeMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of CambridgeMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of MelbourneMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of CambridgeAbstract Aberrations to metacognition—the ability to reflect on and evaluate self-performance—are a feature of poor mental health. Theoretical models of post-traumatic stress disorder propose that following severe stress or trauma, maladaptive metacognitive evaluations and appraisals of the event drive the development of symptoms. Empirical research is required in order to reveal whether disruptions to metacognition cause or contribute to symptom development in line with theoretical accounts, or are simply a consequence of ongoing psychopathology. In two experiments, using hierarchical Bayesian modelling of metacognition measured in a memory recognition task, we assessed whether distortions to metacognition occur at a state-level after an acute stress induction, and/or at a trait-level in a sample of individuals experiencing intrusive memories following traumatic stress. Results from experiment 1, an in-person laboratory-based experiment, demonstrated that heightened psychological responses to the stress induction were associated with poorer metacognitive efficiency, despite there being no overall change in metacognitive efficiency from pre- to post-stress (N = 27). Conversely, in experiment 2, an online experiment using the same metamemory task, we did not find evidence of metacognitive alterations in a transdiagnostic sample of patients with intrusive memory symptomatology following traumatic stress (N = 36, compared to 44 matched controls). Our results indicate a relationship between state-level psychological responses to stress and metacognitive alterations. The lack of evidence for pre- to post-stress differences in metamemory illustrates the importance for future studies to reveal the direction of this relationship, and consequently the duration of stress-associated metacognitive impairments and their impact on mental health.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-02840-z
spellingShingle Alicia J. Smith
James A. Bisby
Quentin Dercon
Anna Bevan
Stacey L. Kigar
Mary-Ellen Lynall
Tim Dalgleish
Caitlin Hitchcock
Camilla L. Nord
Hot metacognition: poorer metacognitive efficiency following acute but not traumatic stress
Translational Psychiatry
title Hot metacognition: poorer metacognitive efficiency following acute but not traumatic stress
title_full Hot metacognition: poorer metacognitive efficiency following acute but not traumatic stress
title_fullStr Hot metacognition: poorer metacognitive efficiency following acute but not traumatic stress
title_full_unstemmed Hot metacognition: poorer metacognitive efficiency following acute but not traumatic stress
title_short Hot metacognition: poorer metacognitive efficiency following acute but not traumatic stress
title_sort hot metacognition poorer metacognitive efficiency following acute but not traumatic stress
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-02840-z
work_keys_str_mv AT aliciajsmith hotmetacognitionpoorermetacognitiveefficiencyfollowingacutebutnottraumaticstress
AT jamesabisby hotmetacognitionpoorermetacognitiveefficiencyfollowingacutebutnottraumaticstress
AT quentindercon hotmetacognitionpoorermetacognitiveefficiencyfollowingacutebutnottraumaticstress
AT annabevan hotmetacognitionpoorermetacognitiveefficiencyfollowingacutebutnottraumaticstress
AT staceylkigar hotmetacognitionpoorermetacognitiveefficiencyfollowingacutebutnottraumaticstress
AT maryellenlynall hotmetacognitionpoorermetacognitiveefficiencyfollowingacutebutnottraumaticstress
AT timdalgleish hotmetacognitionpoorermetacognitiveefficiencyfollowingacutebutnottraumaticstress
AT caitlinhitchcock hotmetacognitionpoorermetacognitiveefficiencyfollowingacutebutnottraumaticstress
AT camillalnord hotmetacognitionpoorermetacognitiveefficiencyfollowingacutebutnottraumaticstress