Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France

Abstract Background Non-participation and attrition are rarely studied despite being important methodological issues when performing post-disaster studies. A longitudinal survey of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France, was conducted 6 (Wave 1) and 18 months (Wave...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cécile Vuillermoz, Lise Eilin Stene, Lydéric Aubert, Yvon Motreff, Philippe Pirard, Thierry Baubet, Sophie Lesieur, Pierre Chauvin, Stéphanie Vandentorren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-03-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-00943-x
_version_ 1818538397600317440
author Cécile Vuillermoz
Lise Eilin Stene
Lydéric Aubert
Yvon Motreff
Philippe Pirard
Thierry Baubet
Sophie Lesieur
Pierre Chauvin
Stéphanie Vandentorren
author_facet Cécile Vuillermoz
Lise Eilin Stene
Lydéric Aubert
Yvon Motreff
Philippe Pirard
Thierry Baubet
Sophie Lesieur
Pierre Chauvin
Stéphanie Vandentorren
author_sort Cécile Vuillermoz
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Non-participation and attrition are rarely studied despite being important methodological issues when performing post-disaster studies. A longitudinal survey of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France, was conducted 6 (Wave 1) and 18 months (Wave 2) after the attacks. We described non-participation in Wave 1 and determined the factors associated with attrition in Wave 2. Methods Multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare participants in both waves with those who participated in the first wave only. Analyses were performed taking the following factors into account: socio-demographic characteristics, exposure to terror, peri-traumatic reactions, psychological support, perceived social support, impact on work, social and family life, and mental health disorders. Characteristics of new participants in Wave 2 were compared with participants in both waves using a chi-square test. Results Of the 390 persons who were eligible to participate in the survey, 190 participated in Wave 1 (participation rate: 49%). The most frequently reported reason for non-participation was to avoid being reminded of the painful event (32%, n = 34/105). In Wave 2, 67 were lost to follow-up, 141 people participated, of whom 123 participated in Wave 1 (re-participation rate: 65%) and 18 were new. Attrition in Wave 2 was associated with socio-demographic characteristics (age, French origin) and location during the attacks, but not with terror exposure or mental health disorders. Compared with those who participated in both waves, new participants declared less social and psychological support since the attacks. Conclusions Attrition at 6 months was not associated with exposure to terror or mental health disorders, which indicates that any bias in future analyses on IMPACTS on mental health outcomes will be limited. Our findings suggest the importance of adapting similar surveys for people of foreign origin and of improving strategies to avoid attrition of younger people, for example by using social media, peers, and the educational environment. The present study also revealed that a high level of exposure to terror and a lack of social and psychological support after a terrorist event could impede individuals’ participation in similar surveys in the short term.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T21:28:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6645f9b0b514403a91155982e1ca6cdb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2288
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T21:28:28Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj.art-6645f9b0b514403a91155982e1ca6cdb2022-12-22T00:50:15ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882020-03-0120111310.1186/s12874-020-00943-xNon-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, FranceCécile Vuillermoz0Lise Eilin Stene1Lydéric Aubert2Yvon Motreff3Philippe Pirard4Thierry Baubet5Sophie Lesieur6Pierre Chauvin7Stéphanie Vandentorren8Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre Maurice Halbwachs (CNRS-UMR8097, EHESS, ENS)Norwegian centre for violence and traumatic stress studies (NKVTS)Santé publique FranceDepartment of Social Epidemiology, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé PubliqueSanté publique France, Direction des maladies non transmissibles et traumatismesCESP Inserm 1178, Université Paris 13Department of Social Epidemiology, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé PubliqueDepartment of Social Epidemiology, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé PubliqueSanté publique FranceAbstract Background Non-participation and attrition are rarely studied despite being important methodological issues when performing post-disaster studies. A longitudinal survey of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France, was conducted 6 (Wave 1) and 18 months (Wave 2) after the attacks. We described non-participation in Wave 1 and determined the factors associated with attrition in Wave 2. Methods Multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare participants in both waves with those who participated in the first wave only. Analyses were performed taking the following factors into account: socio-demographic characteristics, exposure to terror, peri-traumatic reactions, psychological support, perceived social support, impact on work, social and family life, and mental health disorders. Characteristics of new participants in Wave 2 were compared with participants in both waves using a chi-square test. Results Of the 390 persons who were eligible to participate in the survey, 190 participated in Wave 1 (participation rate: 49%). The most frequently reported reason for non-participation was to avoid being reminded of the painful event (32%, n = 34/105). In Wave 2, 67 were lost to follow-up, 141 people participated, of whom 123 participated in Wave 1 (re-participation rate: 65%) and 18 were new. Attrition in Wave 2 was associated with socio-demographic characteristics (age, French origin) and location during the attacks, but not with terror exposure or mental health disorders. Compared with those who participated in both waves, new participants declared less social and psychological support since the attacks. Conclusions Attrition at 6 months was not associated with exposure to terror or mental health disorders, which indicates that any bias in future analyses on IMPACTS on mental health outcomes will be limited. Our findings suggest the importance of adapting similar surveys for people of foreign origin and of improving strategies to avoid attrition of younger people, for example by using social media, peers, and the educational environment. The present study also revealed that a high level of exposure to terror and a lack of social and psychological support after a terrorist event could impede individuals’ participation in similar surveys in the short term.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-00943-xAttritionNon-participationBias selectionTerrorist attack surveyMental health survey
spellingShingle Cécile Vuillermoz
Lise Eilin Stene
Lydéric Aubert
Yvon Motreff
Philippe Pirard
Thierry Baubet
Sophie Lesieur
Pierre Chauvin
Stéphanie Vandentorren
Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Attrition
Non-participation
Bias selection
Terrorist attack survey
Mental health survey
title Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France
title_full Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France
title_fullStr Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France
title_full_unstemmed Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France
title_short Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France
title_sort non participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the january 2015 terrorist attacks in paris france
topic Attrition
Non-participation
Bias selection
Terrorist attack survey
Mental health survey
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-00943-x
work_keys_str_mv AT cecilevuillermoz nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance
AT liseeilinstene nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance
AT lydericaubert nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance
AT yvonmotreff nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance
AT philippepirard nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance
AT thierrybaubet nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance
AT sophielesieur nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance
AT pierrechauvin nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance
AT stephanievandentorren nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance