Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France
Abstract Background Non-participation and attrition are rarely studied despite being important methodological issues when performing post-disaster studies. A longitudinal survey of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France, was conducted 6 (Wave 1) and 18 months (Wave...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-03-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-00943-x |
_version_ | 1818538397600317440 |
---|---|
author | Cécile Vuillermoz Lise Eilin Stene Lydéric Aubert Yvon Motreff Philippe Pirard Thierry Baubet Sophie Lesieur Pierre Chauvin Stéphanie Vandentorren |
author_facet | Cécile Vuillermoz Lise Eilin Stene Lydéric Aubert Yvon Motreff Philippe Pirard Thierry Baubet Sophie Lesieur Pierre Chauvin Stéphanie Vandentorren |
author_sort | Cécile Vuillermoz |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Non-participation and attrition are rarely studied despite being important methodological issues when performing post-disaster studies. A longitudinal survey of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France, was conducted 6 (Wave 1) and 18 months (Wave 2) after the attacks. We described non-participation in Wave 1 and determined the factors associated with attrition in Wave 2. Methods Multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare participants in both waves with those who participated in the first wave only. Analyses were performed taking the following factors into account: socio-demographic characteristics, exposure to terror, peri-traumatic reactions, psychological support, perceived social support, impact on work, social and family life, and mental health disorders. Characteristics of new participants in Wave 2 were compared with participants in both waves using a chi-square test. Results Of the 390 persons who were eligible to participate in the survey, 190 participated in Wave 1 (participation rate: 49%). The most frequently reported reason for non-participation was to avoid being reminded of the painful event (32%, n = 34/105). In Wave 2, 67 were lost to follow-up, 141 people participated, of whom 123 participated in Wave 1 (re-participation rate: 65%) and 18 were new. Attrition in Wave 2 was associated with socio-demographic characteristics (age, French origin) and location during the attacks, but not with terror exposure or mental health disorders. Compared with those who participated in both waves, new participants declared less social and psychological support since the attacks. Conclusions Attrition at 6 months was not associated with exposure to terror or mental health disorders, which indicates that any bias in future analyses on IMPACTS on mental health outcomes will be limited. Our findings suggest the importance of adapting similar surveys for people of foreign origin and of improving strategies to avoid attrition of younger people, for example by using social media, peers, and the educational environment. The present study also revealed that a high level of exposure to terror and a lack of social and psychological support after a terrorist event could impede individuals’ participation in similar surveys in the short term. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T21:28:28Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6645f9b0b514403a91155982e1ca6cdb |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2288 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T21:28:28Z |
publishDate | 2020-03-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
spelling | doaj.art-6645f9b0b514403a91155982e1ca6cdb2022-12-22T00:50:15ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882020-03-0120111310.1186/s12874-020-00943-xNon-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, FranceCécile Vuillermoz0Lise Eilin Stene1Lydéric Aubert2Yvon Motreff3Philippe Pirard4Thierry Baubet5Sophie Lesieur6Pierre Chauvin7Stéphanie Vandentorren8Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre Maurice Halbwachs (CNRS-UMR8097, EHESS, ENS)Norwegian centre for violence and traumatic stress studies (NKVTS)Santé publique FranceDepartment of Social Epidemiology, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé PubliqueSanté publique France, Direction des maladies non transmissibles et traumatismesCESP Inserm 1178, Université Paris 13Department of Social Epidemiology, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé PubliqueDepartment of Social Epidemiology, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé PubliqueSanté publique FranceAbstract Background Non-participation and attrition are rarely studied despite being important methodological issues when performing post-disaster studies. A longitudinal survey of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France, was conducted 6 (Wave 1) and 18 months (Wave 2) after the attacks. We described non-participation in Wave 1 and determined the factors associated with attrition in Wave 2. Methods Multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare participants in both waves with those who participated in the first wave only. Analyses were performed taking the following factors into account: socio-demographic characteristics, exposure to terror, peri-traumatic reactions, psychological support, perceived social support, impact on work, social and family life, and mental health disorders. Characteristics of new participants in Wave 2 were compared with participants in both waves using a chi-square test. Results Of the 390 persons who were eligible to participate in the survey, 190 participated in Wave 1 (participation rate: 49%). The most frequently reported reason for non-participation was to avoid being reminded of the painful event (32%, n = 34/105). In Wave 2, 67 were lost to follow-up, 141 people participated, of whom 123 participated in Wave 1 (re-participation rate: 65%) and 18 were new. Attrition in Wave 2 was associated with socio-demographic characteristics (age, French origin) and location during the attacks, but not with terror exposure or mental health disorders. Compared with those who participated in both waves, new participants declared less social and psychological support since the attacks. Conclusions Attrition at 6 months was not associated with exposure to terror or mental health disorders, which indicates that any bias in future analyses on IMPACTS on mental health outcomes will be limited. Our findings suggest the importance of adapting similar surveys for people of foreign origin and of improving strategies to avoid attrition of younger people, for example by using social media, peers, and the educational environment. The present study also revealed that a high level of exposure to terror and a lack of social and psychological support after a terrorist event could impede individuals’ participation in similar surveys in the short term.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-00943-xAttritionNon-participationBias selectionTerrorist attack surveyMental health survey |
spellingShingle | Cécile Vuillermoz Lise Eilin Stene Lydéric Aubert Yvon Motreff Philippe Pirard Thierry Baubet Sophie Lesieur Pierre Chauvin Stéphanie Vandentorren Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France BMC Medical Research Methodology Attrition Non-participation Bias selection Terrorist attack survey Mental health survey |
title | Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France |
title_full | Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France |
title_fullStr | Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France |
title_short | Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France |
title_sort | non participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the january 2015 terrorist attacks in paris france |
topic | Attrition Non-participation Bias selection Terrorist attack survey Mental health survey |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-00943-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cecilevuillermoz nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance AT liseeilinstene nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance AT lydericaubert nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance AT yvonmotreff nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance AT philippepirard nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance AT thierrybaubet nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance AT sophielesieur nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance AT pierrechauvin nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance AT stephanievandentorren nonparticipationandattritioninalongitudinalstudyofciviliansexposedtothejanuary2015terroristattacksinparisfrance |