Operationalization of the Clinical Frailty Scale in Korean Community-Dwelling Older People

BackgroundThe Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a simple measure of global fitness validated in various populations in real-world settings. In this study, we aimed to assess the characteristics and validities of the CFS in community-dwelling older people in Korea, with the original classification tree...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hee-Won Jung, Ji Yeon Baek, Il-Young Jang, Eunju Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.880511/full
_version_ 1828335303931199488
author Hee-Won Jung
Ji Yeon Baek
Il-Young Jang
Eunju Lee
author_facet Hee-Won Jung
Ji Yeon Baek
Il-Young Jang
Eunju Lee
author_sort Hee-Won Jung
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a simple measure of global fitness validated in various populations in real-world settings. In this study, we aimed to assess the characteristics and validities of the CFS in community-dwelling older people in Korea, with the original classification tree (oCFS) and a culturally modified tree (mCFS).MethodsThe comprehensive geriatric assessment records of 1,064 individuals of the Aging Study of the Pyeongchang Rural Area were used for this study. For mCFS, we considered the dependency of the food preparations and household chores not to be deficits in the male population. The frailty index was used as a reference for construct validity. We used a composite outcome of death and institutionalization for outcome validity.ResultsThe correlation coefficients with frailty index were higher in mCFS (.535) than in oCFS (.468). The mean frailty index was lower in individuals reclassified by mCFS (5 to 4) than people who stayed in mCFS 5. The classification coefficient of mCFS was significantly higher than that of oCFS (p <0.001) in determining people with frailty (frailty index.25 or higher). Trends of a higher incidence of the composite outcome were observed in both higher oCFS and mCFS, in which oCFS and mCFS did not differ significantly in predicting the risk of the outcome.ConclusionThe classification tree of CFS could be culturally adopted in a community-dwelling population of Korea and considered valid in detecting the vulnerable population.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T21:44:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6653d6ccd2134ebb845e932cde5657ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-858X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T21:44:26Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Medicine
spelling doaj.art-6653d6ccd2134ebb845e932cde5657ec2022-12-22T02:28:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2022-06-01910.3389/fmed.2022.880511880511Operationalization of the Clinical Frailty Scale in Korean Community-Dwelling Older PeopleHee-Won JungJi Yeon BaekIl-Young JangEunju LeeBackgroundThe Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a simple measure of global fitness validated in various populations in real-world settings. In this study, we aimed to assess the characteristics and validities of the CFS in community-dwelling older people in Korea, with the original classification tree (oCFS) and a culturally modified tree (mCFS).MethodsThe comprehensive geriatric assessment records of 1,064 individuals of the Aging Study of the Pyeongchang Rural Area were used for this study. For mCFS, we considered the dependency of the food preparations and household chores not to be deficits in the male population. The frailty index was used as a reference for construct validity. We used a composite outcome of death and institutionalization for outcome validity.ResultsThe correlation coefficients with frailty index were higher in mCFS (.535) than in oCFS (.468). The mean frailty index was lower in individuals reclassified by mCFS (5 to 4) than people who stayed in mCFS 5. The classification coefficient of mCFS was significantly higher than that of oCFS (p <0.001) in determining people with frailty (frailty index.25 or higher). Trends of a higher incidence of the composite outcome were observed in both higher oCFS and mCFS, in which oCFS and mCFS did not differ significantly in predicting the risk of the outcome.ConclusionThe classification tree of CFS could be culturally adopted in a community-dwelling population of Korea and considered valid in detecting the vulnerable population.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.880511/fullclinical frailty scalecultureclassificationAsianolder adults
spellingShingle Hee-Won Jung
Ji Yeon Baek
Il-Young Jang
Eunju Lee
Operationalization of the Clinical Frailty Scale in Korean Community-Dwelling Older People
Frontiers in Medicine
clinical frailty scale
culture
classification
Asian
older adults
title Operationalization of the Clinical Frailty Scale in Korean Community-Dwelling Older People
title_full Operationalization of the Clinical Frailty Scale in Korean Community-Dwelling Older People
title_fullStr Operationalization of the Clinical Frailty Scale in Korean Community-Dwelling Older People
title_full_unstemmed Operationalization of the Clinical Frailty Scale in Korean Community-Dwelling Older People
title_short Operationalization of the Clinical Frailty Scale in Korean Community-Dwelling Older People
title_sort operationalization of the clinical frailty scale in korean community dwelling older people
topic clinical frailty scale
culture
classification
Asian
older adults
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.880511/full
work_keys_str_mv AT heewonjung operationalizationoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleinkoreancommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT jiyeonbaek operationalizationoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleinkoreancommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT ilyoungjang operationalizationoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleinkoreancommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT eunjulee operationalizationoftheclinicalfrailtyscaleinkoreancommunitydwellingolderpeople