The politics of gating (A response to Private Security and Public Space by Manzi and Smith-Bowers)

Gated residential developments, neighbourhoods to which public access is restricted, continue to generate academic, policymaker and public curiosity. Why do people want to live in these places and should public interventions be directed towards either their prevention or tacit acceptance? In a rece...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rowland Atkinson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Politecnico di Torino 2008-05-01
Series:European Journal of Spatial Development
Subjects:
Online Access:https://130.192.181.50/index.php/EJSD/article/view/249
_version_ 1797194255141175296
author Rowland Atkinson
author_facet Rowland Atkinson
author_sort Rowland Atkinson
collection DOAJ
description Gated residential developments, neighbourhoods to which public access is restricted, continue to generate academic, policymaker and public curiosity. Why do people want to live in these places and should public interventions be directed towards either their prevention or tacit acceptance? In a recent paper in this journal, Tony Manzi and Bill Smith-Bowers (2006) attempt to provide what they see as a more subtle approach to these developments, arguing, by way of a critique of some of my earlier work (centrally that of Atkinson and Blandy, 2005), that hostility to gated communities is misplaced on several grounds. I argue here, in return, that there are several problems with the positions they adopt, and that these should be considered if we are to effectively discuss how planning practice and housing systems should work with or against these new trends in the built environment. I argue that the key ‘problematic’ raised by gated communities is less one of empirical evidence on their impacts, since much work already points to a range of problems, and rather what these developments forecast for the character and dynamics of the urban spaces and societies we wish to live in. At the heart of my position lies a concern that either bolstering the case for gated communities or seeing them as neutral objects in the landscapes around us risks amplifying the further construction of impermeable boundaries. Critically then the risk is that ignoring the political and normative aspects of gating, as I believe Manzi and Smith-Bowers do, may lead to further and deeper socio-spatial segregation that itself excludes the voice of social groups least able to challenge or, indeed, reside in gated developments and the additional security that they appear to offer.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T10:02:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-665cd4e104054cd4ad5d39f9617b9d93
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1650-9544
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T05:53:22Z
publishDate 2008-05-01
publisher Politecnico di Torino
record_format Article
series European Journal of Spatial Development
spelling doaj.art-665cd4e104054cd4ad5d39f9617b9d932024-04-23T09:42:19ZengPolitecnico di TorinoEuropean Journal of Spatial Development1650-95442008-05-0167The politics of gating (A response to Private Security and Public Space by Manzi and Smith-Bowers)Rowland Atkinson0Housing and Community Research Unit, School of Sociology and Social Work, University of Tasmania Gated residential developments, neighbourhoods to which public access is restricted, continue to generate academic, policymaker and public curiosity. Why do people want to live in these places and should public interventions be directed towards either their prevention or tacit acceptance? In a recent paper in this journal, Tony Manzi and Bill Smith-Bowers (2006) attempt to provide what they see as a more subtle approach to these developments, arguing, by way of a critique of some of my earlier work (centrally that of Atkinson and Blandy, 2005), that hostility to gated communities is misplaced on several grounds. I argue here, in return, that there are several problems with the positions they adopt, and that these should be considered if we are to effectively discuss how planning practice and housing systems should work with or against these new trends in the built environment. I argue that the key ‘problematic’ raised by gated communities is less one of empirical evidence on their impacts, since much work already points to a range of problems, and rather what these developments forecast for the character and dynamics of the urban spaces and societies we wish to live in. At the heart of my position lies a concern that either bolstering the case for gated communities or seeing them as neutral objects in the landscapes around us risks amplifying the further construction of impermeable boundaries. Critically then the risk is that ignoring the political and normative aspects of gating, as I believe Manzi and Smith-Bowers do, may lead to further and deeper socio-spatial segregation that itself excludes the voice of social groups least able to challenge or, indeed, reside in gated developments and the additional security that they appear to offer. https://130.192.181.50/index.php/EJSD/article/view/249gated communities
spellingShingle Rowland Atkinson
The politics of gating (A response to Private Security and Public Space by Manzi and Smith-Bowers)
European Journal of Spatial Development
gated communities
title The politics of gating (A response to Private Security and Public Space by Manzi and Smith-Bowers)
title_full The politics of gating (A response to Private Security and Public Space by Manzi and Smith-Bowers)
title_fullStr The politics of gating (A response to Private Security and Public Space by Manzi and Smith-Bowers)
title_full_unstemmed The politics of gating (A response to Private Security and Public Space by Manzi and Smith-Bowers)
title_short The politics of gating (A response to Private Security and Public Space by Manzi and Smith-Bowers)
title_sort politics of gating a response to private security and public space by manzi and smith bowers
topic gated communities
url https://130.192.181.50/index.php/EJSD/article/view/249
work_keys_str_mv AT rowlandatkinson thepoliticsofgatingaresponsetoprivatesecurityandpublicspacebymanziandsmithbowers
AT rowlandatkinson politicsofgatingaresponsetoprivatesecurityandpublicspacebymanziandsmithbowers