Compare the Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure with Two Different Methods to Treat Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Background: Various continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices have been used in treatment of neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). This study was designed to compare the efficacy of bubble CPAP versus medijet CPAP, used along with surfactant, to treat RDS during the first hours...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Majid Mohammadizadeh, Ali Reza Asadi, Ali Reza Sadeghnia
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2011-09-01
Series:مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/1180
_version_ 1797722768912941056
author Majid Mohammadizadeh
Ali Reza Asadi
Ali Reza Sadeghnia
author_facet Majid Mohammadizadeh
Ali Reza Asadi
Ali Reza Sadeghnia
author_sort Majid Mohammadizadeh
collection DOAJ
description Background: Various continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices have been used in treatment of neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). This study was designed to compare the efficacy of bubble CPAP versus medijet CPAP, used along with surfactant, to treat RDS during the first hours of life. Methods: Eighty-eight neonates with gestational age between 29 to 336/7 weeks who had clinical manifestations of RDS and required FIO2 > 21% were randomly assigned to receive either bubble CPAP or medijet CPAP (44 in each group). During the first 30 to 60 minutes of life, if CPAP rises to 8 cm H2O and FIO2 requirement exceeds 40%, surfactant was administered via endotracheal tube. The procedure was repeated twice more at 12 hour intervals, if CPAP treatment had to be continued with FIO2 > 30%. Mechanical ventilation was considered in the presence of clinical or laboratory evidence of respiratory failure. Duration of CPAP treatment and oxygen therapy, need for second and third doses of surfactant and mechanical ventilation, and the occurrence of chronic lung disease (CLD) and pneumothorax were compared between groups. Findings: There was no significant difference in the duration of CPAP treatment and oxygen therapy between bubble CPAP and medijet CPAP groups (47 ± 25.7 vs. 46.7 ± 22.4 [P = 0.874] and 158.7 ± 191.9 vs. 144 ± 165.9 [P = 0.702], respectively). The need for second and third doses of surfactant and mechanical ventilation, and the occurrence of CLD and pneumothorax were not significantly different between groups (P was 1, 0.361, 1, 0.72 and 1, respectively).   Conclusion: Considering the limited available data, it is highly recommended to evaluate the similar efficacy of bubble CPAP and medijet CPAP in treatment of RDS, along with the use of surfactant, in other large clinical trials.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T09:52:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-665f8823dd0c480a890b3e5791ac9bd6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-7595
1735-854X
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-12T09:52:12Z
publishDate 2011-09-01
publisher Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
spelling doaj.art-665f8823dd0c480a890b3e5791ac9bd62023-09-02T12:24:06ZfasIsfahan University of Medical Sciencesمجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان1027-75951735-854X2011-09-0129146901911717Compare the Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure with Two Different Methods to Treat Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress SyndromeMajid Mohammadizadeh0Ali Reza Asadi1Ali Reza Sadeghnia2Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Child Health Promotion Research Center, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranResident of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Child Health Promotion Research Center, School of Medicine And Student Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranAssistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Child Health Promotion Research Center, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranBackground: Various continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices have been used in treatment of neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). This study was designed to compare the efficacy of bubble CPAP versus medijet CPAP, used along with surfactant, to treat RDS during the first hours of life. Methods: Eighty-eight neonates with gestational age between 29 to 336/7 weeks who had clinical manifestations of RDS and required FIO2 > 21% were randomly assigned to receive either bubble CPAP or medijet CPAP (44 in each group). During the first 30 to 60 minutes of life, if CPAP rises to 8 cm H2O and FIO2 requirement exceeds 40%, surfactant was administered via endotracheal tube. The procedure was repeated twice more at 12 hour intervals, if CPAP treatment had to be continued with FIO2 > 30%. Mechanical ventilation was considered in the presence of clinical or laboratory evidence of respiratory failure. Duration of CPAP treatment and oxygen therapy, need for second and third doses of surfactant and mechanical ventilation, and the occurrence of chronic lung disease (CLD) and pneumothorax were compared between groups. Findings: There was no significant difference in the duration of CPAP treatment and oxygen therapy between bubble CPAP and medijet CPAP groups (47 ± 25.7 vs. 46.7 ± 22.4 [P = 0.874] and 158.7 ± 191.9 vs. 144 ± 165.9 [P = 0.702], respectively). The need for second and third doses of surfactant and mechanical ventilation, and the occurrence of CLD and pneumothorax were not significantly different between groups (P was 1, 0.361, 1, 0.72 and 1, respectively).   Conclusion: Considering the limited available data, it is highly recommended to evaluate the similar efficacy of bubble CPAP and medijet CPAP in treatment of RDS, along with the use of surfactant, in other large clinical trials.http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/1180Respiratory distress syndromeNeonatesBubble CPAPMedijet CPAP
spellingShingle Majid Mohammadizadeh
Ali Reza Asadi
Ali Reza Sadeghnia
Compare the Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure with Two Different Methods to Treat Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
Respiratory distress syndrome
Neonates
Bubble CPAP
Medijet CPAP
title Compare the Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure with Two Different Methods to Treat Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_full Compare the Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure with Two Different Methods to Treat Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_fullStr Compare the Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure with Two Different Methods to Treat Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Compare the Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure with Two Different Methods to Treat Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_short Compare the Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure with Two Different Methods to Treat Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_sort compare the effects of continuous positive airway pressure with two different methods to treat premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome
topic Respiratory distress syndrome
Neonates
Bubble CPAP
Medijet CPAP
url http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/1180
work_keys_str_mv AT majidmohammadizadeh comparetheeffectsofcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurewithtwodifferentmethodstotreatprematureinfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT alirezaasadi comparetheeffectsofcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurewithtwodifferentmethodstotreatprematureinfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT alirezasadeghnia comparetheeffectsofcontinuouspositiveairwaypressurewithtwodifferentmethodstotreatprematureinfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndrome