Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography,Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone Defects
Background and Aim: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) produces high-quality data in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of CBCT with intraoral digital and conventional radiography in the measurement of periodontal bone defects. Methods...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Islamic Azad University
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-279-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
| _version_ | 1819057106087575552 |
|---|---|
| author | M Dehghani H Montazer lotf elahi M Moeini R Bardal |
| author_facet | M Dehghani H Montazer lotf elahi M Moeini R Bardal |
| author_sort | M Dehghani |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background and Aim: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) produces high-quality data in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of CBCT with intraoral digital and conventional radiography in the measurement of periodontal bone defects.
Methods and Materials: In this diagnostic research, two hundred and eighteen artificial osseous defects (buccal and lingual infra-bony, inter proximal, horizontal, crater, dehiscence and fenestration defects) were shaped in 13 dry mandibles. CBCT and intraoral radiography with parallel technique by conventional film and digital sensor were compared with the standard reference (digital caliper). Inter and intra observer agreement were assessed using Intra class correlation co-efficient and Pearson correlation. Paired T-Test was applied for the comparison of absolute differences of conventional and digital intraoral radiography and CBCT measurements with the gold standard. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® v13.0 statistical software.
Results: Inter and intra observer agreement were both high for CBCT (ICC: α=0/88) but moderate for intraoral conventional radiography (ICC: α=0/54) and digital radiography (ICC: α=0/73). No significant differences were detected between the observers for all the techniques (P> 0.05). According to Paired T-test, mean difference for CBCT technique (0.01mm) was lower than digital radiography (0.47mm) and conventional radiography (0.63mm). CBCT allowed the measurement of all lesion types, but intraoral radiography did not allow the measurement of buccal and lingual defects.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the studied radiographic modalities are useful in identifying the periodontal bone defects. CBCT technique showed the highest accuracy in the measurement of periodontal bone defects compared with digital and conventional intraoral radiography. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T13:34:02Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6670eec4b13a45fb933657e5405194d7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2383-2754 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T13:34:02Z |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Islamic Azad University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-6670eec4b13a45fb933657e5405194d72022-12-21T19:02:13ZengIslamic Azad UniversityJournal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences2383-27542016-01-01113439Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography,Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone DefectsM Dehghani0H Montazer lotf elahi1M Moeini2R Bardal3 Assistant Professor, Radiology Dept, Yazd University of Medical Sciences. MD. Fellowship of Pediatric Neurology, Pediatrics Dept, Tehran University of Medical Science Oral & Maxillofacial Radiologist Assistant Professor, Radiology Dept, Gazvin University of Medical Sciences. Background and Aim: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) produces high-quality data in periodontal diagnosis and treatment planning. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of CBCT with intraoral digital and conventional radiography in the measurement of periodontal bone defects. Methods and Materials: In this diagnostic research, two hundred and eighteen artificial osseous defects (buccal and lingual infra-bony, inter proximal, horizontal, crater, dehiscence and fenestration defects) were shaped in 13 dry mandibles. CBCT and intraoral radiography with parallel technique by conventional film and digital sensor were compared with the standard reference (digital caliper). Inter and intra observer agreement were assessed using Intra class correlation co-efficient and Pearson correlation. Paired T-Test was applied for the comparison of absolute differences of conventional and digital intraoral radiography and CBCT measurements with the gold standard. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® v13.0 statistical software. Results: Inter and intra observer agreement were both high for CBCT (ICC: α=0/88) but moderate for intraoral conventional radiography (ICC: α=0/54) and digital radiography (ICC: α=0/73). No significant differences were detected between the observers for all the techniques (P> 0.05). According to Paired T-test, mean difference for CBCT technique (0.01mm) was lower than digital radiography (0.47mm) and conventional radiography (0.63mm). CBCT allowed the measurement of all lesion types, but intraoral radiography did not allow the measurement of buccal and lingual defects. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the studied radiographic modalities are useful in identifying the periodontal bone defects. CBCT technique showed the highest accuracy in the measurement of periodontal bone defects compared with digital and conventional intraoral radiography.http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-279-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1Cone beam computed tomographyDental radiographyDigital radiographyPeriodontal disease. |
| spellingShingle | M Dehghani H Montazer lotf elahi M Moeini R Bardal Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography,Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone Defects Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences Cone beam computed tomography Dental radiography Digital radiography Periodontal disease. |
| title | Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography,Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral
Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone Defects |
| title_full | Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography,Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral
Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone Defects |
| title_fullStr | Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography,Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral
Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone Defects |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography,Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral
Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone Defects |
| title_short | Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography,Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral
Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone Defects |
| title_sort | comparing the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography digital intraoral radiography and conventional intraoral radiography in the measurement of periodontal bone defects |
| topic | Cone beam computed tomography Dental radiography Digital radiography Periodontal disease. |
| url | http://jrdms.dentaliau.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-279-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mdehghani comparingtheaccuracyofconebeamcomputedtomographydigitalintraoralradiographyandconventionalintraoralradiographyinthemeasurementofperiodontalbonedefects AT hmontazerlotfelahi comparingtheaccuracyofconebeamcomputedtomographydigitalintraoralradiographyandconventionalintraoralradiographyinthemeasurementofperiodontalbonedefects AT mmoeini comparingtheaccuracyofconebeamcomputedtomographydigitalintraoralradiographyandconventionalintraoralradiographyinthemeasurementofperiodontalbonedefects AT rbardal comparingtheaccuracyofconebeamcomputedtomographydigitalintraoralradiographyandconventionalintraoralradiographyinthemeasurementofperiodontalbonedefects |