The perspective of health professionals on the factor of 3rd persons in assisted reproductive techniques
This study was planned with the aim of determining the perspective of health professionals on the factor of 3rd persons in assisted reproductive therapy techniques. The study, which is cross-sectional and descriptive, was conducted at a university hospital in the province of Malatya between the date...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Society of Turaz Bilim
2017-09-01
|
| Series: | Medicine Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=251151 |
| _version_ | 1797329226993500160 |
|---|---|
| author | Yesim Aksoy Derya Tuba Ucar Sermin Timur Tashan |
| author_facet | Yesim Aksoy Derya Tuba Ucar Sermin Timur Tashan |
| author_sort | Yesim Aksoy Derya |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study was planned with the aim of determining the perspective of health professionals on the factor of 3rd persons in assisted reproductive therapy techniques. The study, which is cross-sectional and descriptive, was conducted at a university hospital in the province of Malatya between the dates April and June 2016. After a power analysis, the sample size was determined as 405 health professionals. In the statistical analysis of the data, the study used means, standard deviations and percentage distributions. Among the participants with the mean age of 2.77371, 62.7% were women and 83.5% were nurses. 27.2% stated that legal permission should be provided in assisted reproduction for oocyte donation with a 3rd person, surrogacy and sperm banks. On the other hand, 50.4% of the participants stated that they may recommend their patients other countries for operations that concern 3rd persons. It was found that the reason participants did not find these techniques appropriate was morals/ethics for 69.6% and religious reasons for 77.3%. 39.7% of the participants stated that, in a case where the only choice left for having a child is assisted reproductive methods that require a 3rd person, they would accept infertility and do nothing. The ratio of people who stated they would accept treatment was 19%. Among the participants who said they would accept treatment, 83.1% would absolutely choose someone they do not know. Additionally, 52.3% stated that they would not want themselves or their spouses become donors. Consequently, only 27.2% of health professionals stated that assisted reproductive techniques with 3rd persons should be legal. On the other hand, 50.4% stated they may forward their patients to other countries for these methods. It was seen that health professionals experienced a dilemma regarding this subject especially on grounds of morals/ethics and religious concerns. [Med-Science 2017; 6(3.000): 541-5] |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T07:02:44Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6671fd5fa77e4ec59473906d7c451be0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2147-0634 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T07:02:44Z |
| publishDate | 2017-09-01 |
| publisher | Society of Turaz Bilim |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Medicine Science |
| spelling | doaj.art-6671fd5fa77e4ec59473906d7c451be02024-02-03T05:37:03ZengSociety of Turaz BilimMedicine Science2147-06342017-09-0163541510.5455/medscience.2017.06.8617251151The perspective of health professionals on the factor of 3rd persons in assisted reproductive techniquesYesim Aksoy Derya0Tuba Ucar1Sermin Timur Tashan2Inonu University Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Midwifery, Malatya, Turkey Inonu University Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Midwifery, Malatya, Turkey Inonu University Faculty of Health Sciences Nursing Department, Malatya, TurkeyThis study was planned with the aim of determining the perspective of health professionals on the factor of 3rd persons in assisted reproductive therapy techniques. The study, which is cross-sectional and descriptive, was conducted at a university hospital in the province of Malatya between the dates April and June 2016. After a power analysis, the sample size was determined as 405 health professionals. In the statistical analysis of the data, the study used means, standard deviations and percentage distributions. Among the participants with the mean age of 2.77371, 62.7% were women and 83.5% were nurses. 27.2% stated that legal permission should be provided in assisted reproduction for oocyte donation with a 3rd person, surrogacy and sperm banks. On the other hand, 50.4% of the participants stated that they may recommend their patients other countries for operations that concern 3rd persons. It was found that the reason participants did not find these techniques appropriate was morals/ethics for 69.6% and religious reasons for 77.3%. 39.7% of the participants stated that, in a case where the only choice left for having a child is assisted reproductive methods that require a 3rd person, they would accept infertility and do nothing. The ratio of people who stated they would accept treatment was 19%. Among the participants who said they would accept treatment, 83.1% would absolutely choose someone they do not know. Additionally, 52.3% stated that they would not want themselves or their spouses become donors. Consequently, only 27.2% of health professionals stated that assisted reproductive techniques with 3rd persons should be legal. On the other hand, 50.4% stated they may forward their patients to other countries for these methods. It was seen that health professionals experienced a dilemma regarding this subject especially on grounds of morals/ethics and religious concerns. [Med-Science 2017; 6(3.000): 541-5]http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=251151Oocyte donationhealth professionals,sperm banksurrogate motherhood3rd persons in assisted reproductive techniques |
| spellingShingle | Yesim Aksoy Derya Tuba Ucar Sermin Timur Tashan The perspective of health professionals on the factor of 3rd persons in assisted reproductive techniques Medicine Science Oocyte donation health professionals,sperm bank surrogate motherhood 3rd persons in assisted reproductive techniques |
| title | The perspective of health professionals on the factor of 3rd persons in assisted reproductive techniques |
| title_full | The perspective of health professionals on the factor of 3rd persons in assisted reproductive techniques |
| title_fullStr | The perspective of health professionals on the factor of 3rd persons in assisted reproductive techniques |
| title_full_unstemmed | The perspective of health professionals on the factor of 3rd persons in assisted reproductive techniques |
| title_short | The perspective of health professionals on the factor of 3rd persons in assisted reproductive techniques |
| title_sort | perspective of health professionals on the factor of 3rd persons in assisted reproductive techniques |
| topic | Oocyte donation health professionals,sperm bank surrogate motherhood 3rd persons in assisted reproductive techniques |
| url | http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=251151 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yesimaksoyderya theperspectiveofhealthprofessionalsonthefactorof3rdpersonsinassistedreproductivetechniques AT tubaucar theperspectiveofhealthprofessionalsonthefactorof3rdpersonsinassistedreproductivetechniques AT sermintimurtashan theperspectiveofhealthprofessionalsonthefactorof3rdpersonsinassistedreproductivetechniques AT yesimaksoyderya perspectiveofhealthprofessionalsonthefactorof3rdpersonsinassistedreproductivetechniques AT tubaucar perspectiveofhealthprofessionalsonthefactorof3rdpersonsinassistedreproductivetechniques AT sermintimurtashan perspectiveofhealthprofessionalsonthefactorof3rdpersonsinassistedreproductivetechniques |