The Deficiencies Judgment: Postponing the Constitutional Moment
<p>Much was at stake in the LM / Deficiencies decision. The Court of Justice was called to strike a complex balance between different interests, a balance that was bound to be controversial. While the ruling was not the defining ‘constitutional moment’, this moment might be only postponed. The...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
| Series: | Verfassungsblog |
| Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/the-deficiencies-judgment-postponing-the-constitutional-moment/ |
| _version_ | 1817968973085409280 |
|---|---|
| author | Matteo Bonelli |
| author_facet | Matteo Bonelli |
| author_sort | Matteo Bonelli |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Much was at stake in the LM / Deficiencies decision. The Court of Justice was called to strike a complex balance between different interests, a balance that was bound to be controversial. While the ruling was not the defining ‘constitutional moment’, this moment might be only postponed. The Court made it clear that ‘red lines’ already exist in European constitutional law, and that it is willing to operationalize them. Nonetheless, it should not be forgotten that the Court should not replace the ‘political game’ – a game that is clearly on.</p>
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T20:15:36Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6673c12a35344654a423fee3bde89c4d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2366-7044 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T20:15:36Z |
| publisher | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Verfassungsblog |
| spelling | doaj.art-6673c12a35344654a423fee3bde89c4d2022-12-22T02:31:44ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442366-7044The Deficiencies Judgment: Postponing the Constitutional MomentMatteo Bonelli<p>Much was at stake in the LM / Deficiencies decision. The Court of Justice was called to strike a complex balance between different interests, a balance that was bound to be controversial. While the ruling was not the defining ‘constitutional moment’, this moment might be only postponed. The Court made it clear that ‘red lines’ already exist in European constitutional law, and that it is willing to operationalize them. Nonetheless, it should not be forgotten that the Court should not replace the ‘political game’ – a game that is clearly on.</p> https://verfassungsblog.de/the-deficiencies-judgment-postponing-the-constitutional-moment/ |
| spellingShingle | Matteo Bonelli The Deficiencies Judgment: Postponing the Constitutional Moment Verfassungsblog |
| title | The Deficiencies Judgment: Postponing the Constitutional Moment |
| title_full | The Deficiencies Judgment: Postponing the Constitutional Moment |
| title_fullStr | The Deficiencies Judgment: Postponing the Constitutional Moment |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Deficiencies Judgment: Postponing the Constitutional Moment |
| title_short | The Deficiencies Judgment: Postponing the Constitutional Moment |
| title_sort | deficiencies judgment postponing the constitutional moment |
| url | https://verfassungsblog.de/the-deficiencies-judgment-postponing-the-constitutional-moment/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT matteobonelli thedeficienciesjudgmentpostponingtheconstitutionalmoment AT matteobonelli deficienciesjudgmentpostponingtheconstitutionalmoment |