Sterilization as an alternative deer control technique: a review
Burgeoning white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations in suburban landscapes continue to impact communities and challenge natural resource managers. Increased deer-related damage to vegetation, ecosystems, and automobiles can exceed the tolerance of local stakeholders. We provide an over...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Utah State University
2017-02-01
|
Series: | Human-Wildlife Interactions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol6/iss2/9 |
_version_ | 1818533553735991296 |
---|---|
author | Jason R. Boulanger Paul D. Curtis Anthony J. DeNicola |
author_facet | Jason R. Boulanger Paul D. Curtis Anthony J. DeNicola |
author_sort | Jason R. Boulanger |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Burgeoning white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations in suburban landscapes continue to impact communities and challenge natural resource managers. Increased deer-related damage to vegetation, ecosystems, and automobiles can exceed the tolerance of local stakeholders. We provide an overview of the potential efficacy of using surgical sterilization to help manage populations and conflicts associated with locally overabundant white-tailed deer populations. We review theoretical and fi eld studies pertaining to deer sterilization, and provide research priorities to help guide future sterilization efforts. Recent fi eld studies suggest that sterilization of female deer remains expensive, at approximately $1,000 per surgery. Sterilization may provide an alternative management technique for reducing suburban deer herds in communities willing to endure the costs of a long-term effort and where lethal deer removal is unacceptable or impractical. Surgical sterilization is scale-limited based on the ability to capture and sterilize 80% or more of the female deer in a population and maintain that proportion of the population treated over time. Overall success will be greatest for closed or insular deer herds where the effects of immigration can be minimized. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T18:00:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-66760562a2c24b44822844192937b614 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2155-3874 2155-3874 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T18:00:15Z |
publishDate | 2017-02-01 |
publisher | Utah State University |
record_format | Article |
series | Human-Wildlife Interactions |
spelling | doaj.art-66760562a2c24b44822844192937b6142022-12-22T00:55:55ZengUtah State UniversityHuman-Wildlife Interactions2155-38742155-38742017-02-016210.26077/z3gm-0570Sterilization as an alternative deer control technique: a reviewJason R. Boulanger0Paul D. Curtis1Anthony J. DeNicola2Cornell UniversityCornell UniversityWhite Buffalo Inc.Burgeoning white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations in suburban landscapes continue to impact communities and challenge natural resource managers. Increased deer-related damage to vegetation, ecosystems, and automobiles can exceed the tolerance of local stakeholders. We provide an overview of the potential efficacy of using surgical sterilization to help manage populations and conflicts associated with locally overabundant white-tailed deer populations. We review theoretical and fi eld studies pertaining to deer sterilization, and provide research priorities to help guide future sterilization efforts. Recent fi eld studies suggest that sterilization of female deer remains expensive, at approximately $1,000 per surgery. Sterilization may provide an alternative management technique for reducing suburban deer herds in communities willing to endure the costs of a long-term effort and where lethal deer removal is unacceptable or impractical. Surgical sterilization is scale-limited based on the ability to capture and sterilize 80% or more of the female deer in a population and maintain that proportion of the population treated over time. Overall success will be greatest for closed or insular deer herds where the effects of immigration can be minimized.https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol6/iss2/9controlhuman–wildlife conflictsodocoileus virginianussterilizationsurgerywhite-tailed deer. |
spellingShingle | Jason R. Boulanger Paul D. Curtis Anthony J. DeNicola Sterilization as an alternative deer control technique: a review Human-Wildlife Interactions control human–wildlife conflicts odocoileus virginianus sterilization surgery white-tailed deer. |
title | Sterilization as an alternative deer control technique: a review |
title_full | Sterilization as an alternative deer control technique: a review |
title_fullStr | Sterilization as an alternative deer control technique: a review |
title_full_unstemmed | Sterilization as an alternative deer control technique: a review |
title_short | Sterilization as an alternative deer control technique: a review |
title_sort | sterilization as an alternative deer control technique a review |
topic | control human–wildlife conflicts odocoileus virginianus sterilization surgery white-tailed deer. |
url | https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/hwi/vol6/iss2/9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jasonrboulanger sterilizationasanalternativedeercontroltechniqueareview AT pauldcurtis sterilizationasanalternativedeercontroltechniqueareview AT anthonyjdenicola sterilizationasanalternativedeercontroltechniqueareview |