Increased error-correction leads to both higher levels of variability and adaptation.

In order to intercept moving objects, we need to predict the spatiotemporal features of the motion of both the object and our hand. Our errors can result in updates of these predictions to benefit interceptions in the future (adaptation). Recent studies claim that task-relevant variability in baseli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisabeth B Knelange, Joan López-Moliner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227913
_version_ 1818916424488321024
author Elisabeth B Knelange
Joan López-Moliner
author_facet Elisabeth B Knelange
Joan López-Moliner
author_sort Elisabeth B Knelange
collection DOAJ
description In order to intercept moving objects, we need to predict the spatiotemporal features of the motion of both the object and our hand. Our errors can result in updates of these predictions to benefit interceptions in the future (adaptation). Recent studies claim that task-relevant variability in baseline performance can help adapt to perturbations, because initial variability helps explore the spatial demands of the task. In this study, we examined whether this relationship is also found in interception (temporal domain) by looking at the link between the variability of hand-movement speed during baseline trials, and the adaptation to a temporal perturbation. 17 subjects performed an interception task on a graphic tablet with a stylus. A target moved from left to right or vice versa, with varying speed across trials. Participants were instructed to intercept this target with a straight forward movement of their hand. Their movements were represented by a cursor that was displayed on a screen above the tablet. To prevent online corrections we blocked the hand from view, and a part of the cursor's trajectory was occluded. After a baseline phase of 80 trials, a temporal delay of 100 ms was introduced to the cursor representing the hand (adaptation phase: 80 trials). This delay initially caused participants to miss the target, but they quickly accounted for these errors by adapting to most of the delay of the cursor. We found that variability in baseline movement velocity is a good predictor of temporal adaptation (defined as a combination of the rate of change and the asymptotic level of change after a perturbation), with higher variability during baseline being associated with better adaptation. However, cross-correlation results suggest that the increased variability is the result of increased error correction, rather than exploration.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T00:17:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-66798f7f6a624b3ba7fc472e05220a9d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T00:17:57Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-66798f7f6a624b3ba7fc472e05220a9d2022-12-21T20:00:16ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01152e022791310.1371/journal.pone.0227913Increased error-correction leads to both higher levels of variability and adaptation.Elisabeth B KnelangeJoan López-MolinerIn order to intercept moving objects, we need to predict the spatiotemporal features of the motion of both the object and our hand. Our errors can result in updates of these predictions to benefit interceptions in the future (adaptation). Recent studies claim that task-relevant variability in baseline performance can help adapt to perturbations, because initial variability helps explore the spatial demands of the task. In this study, we examined whether this relationship is also found in interception (temporal domain) by looking at the link between the variability of hand-movement speed during baseline trials, and the adaptation to a temporal perturbation. 17 subjects performed an interception task on a graphic tablet with a stylus. A target moved from left to right or vice versa, with varying speed across trials. Participants were instructed to intercept this target with a straight forward movement of their hand. Their movements were represented by a cursor that was displayed on a screen above the tablet. To prevent online corrections we blocked the hand from view, and a part of the cursor's trajectory was occluded. After a baseline phase of 80 trials, a temporal delay of 100 ms was introduced to the cursor representing the hand (adaptation phase: 80 trials). This delay initially caused participants to miss the target, but they quickly accounted for these errors by adapting to most of the delay of the cursor. We found that variability in baseline movement velocity is a good predictor of temporal adaptation (defined as a combination of the rate of change and the asymptotic level of change after a perturbation), with higher variability during baseline being associated with better adaptation. However, cross-correlation results suggest that the increased variability is the result of increased error correction, rather than exploration.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227913
spellingShingle Elisabeth B Knelange
Joan López-Moliner
Increased error-correction leads to both higher levels of variability and adaptation.
PLoS ONE
title Increased error-correction leads to both higher levels of variability and adaptation.
title_full Increased error-correction leads to both higher levels of variability and adaptation.
title_fullStr Increased error-correction leads to both higher levels of variability and adaptation.
title_full_unstemmed Increased error-correction leads to both higher levels of variability and adaptation.
title_short Increased error-correction leads to both higher levels of variability and adaptation.
title_sort increased error correction leads to both higher levels of variability and adaptation
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227913
work_keys_str_mv AT elisabethbknelange increasederrorcorrectionleadstobothhigherlevelsofvariabilityandadaptation
AT joanlopezmoliner increasederrorcorrectionleadstobothhigherlevelsofvariabilityandadaptation