Correction to: The FreeD module for the Lokomat facilitates a physiological movement pattern in healthy people – a proof of concept study
The original article [1] contains an error whereby the legends of Figs. 3 and 4 are erroneously swapped. As such, the correct configuration of these legends can be seen in the same figures below instead.
Main Authors: | Tabea Aurich-Schuler, Anja Gut, Rob Labruyère |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-019-0541-9 |
Similar Items
-
The FreeD module’s lateral translation timing in the gait robot Lokomat: a manual adaptation is necessary
by: Tabea Aurich (-Schuler), et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
An Increase in Kinematic Freedom in the Lokomat Is Related to the Ability to Elicit a Physiological Muscle Activity Pattern: A Secondary Data Analysis Investigating Differences Between Guidance Force, Path Control, and FreeD
by: Tabea Aurich-Schuler, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Can Lokomat therapy with children and adolescents be improved? An adaptive clinical pilot trial comparing Guidance force, Path control, and FreeD
by: Tabea Aurich-Schuler, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Clustering trunk movements of children and adolescents with neurological gait disorders undergoing robot-assisted gait therapy: the functional ability determines if actuated pelvis movements are clinically useful
by: Florian van Dellen, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
Learning to Be Freed
by: Eda Elif Tibet, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)