Comparison of efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation between cryoballoon ablation and high-power short-duration ablation

Background: High-power short-duration (HPSD) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA) has been used for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Objective: We aimed to compare the efficacy of PVI between CBA and HPSD ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ankit Jain, Chun-Chao Chen, Shih-Lin Chang, Yenn-Jiang Lin, Li-Wei Lo, Yu-Feng Hu, Fa-Po Chung, Chin-Yu Lin, Ting-Yung Chang, Ta-Chuan Tuan, Tze-Fan Chao, Jo-Nan Liao, Chih-Min Liu, Cheng-I Wu, Chye-Gen Chin, Wen-Han Cheng, Shin-Huei Liu, Ching-Yao Chou, Isaiah C. Lugtu, Shih-Ann Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-07-01
Series:Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629223000402
_version_ 1797798139253489664
author Ankit Jain
Chun-Chao Chen
Shih-Lin Chang
Yenn-Jiang Lin
Li-Wei Lo
Yu-Feng Hu
Fa-Po Chung
Chin-Yu Lin
Ting-Yung Chang
Ta-Chuan Tuan
Tze-Fan Chao
Jo-Nan Liao
Chih-Min Liu
Cheng-I Wu
Chye-Gen Chin
Wen-Han Cheng
Shin-Huei Liu
Ching-Yao Chou
Isaiah C. Lugtu
Shih-Ann Chen
author_facet Ankit Jain
Chun-Chao Chen
Shih-Lin Chang
Yenn-Jiang Lin
Li-Wei Lo
Yu-Feng Hu
Fa-Po Chung
Chin-Yu Lin
Ting-Yung Chang
Ta-Chuan Tuan
Tze-Fan Chao
Jo-Nan Liao
Chih-Min Liu
Cheng-I Wu
Chye-Gen Chin
Wen-Han Cheng
Shin-Huei Liu
Ching-Yao Chou
Isaiah C. Lugtu
Shih-Ann Chen
author_sort Ankit Jain
collection DOAJ
description Background: High-power short-duration (HPSD) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA) has been used for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Objective: We aimed to compare the efficacy of PVI between CBA and HPSD ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 251 consecutive PAF patients from January 2018 to July 2020. Of them, 124 patients (mean age 57.2 ± 10.1 year) received HPSD and 127 patients (mean age 59.6 ± 9.4 year) received CBA. In HPSD group, the radiofrequency energy was set as 50 W/10 s at anterior wall and 40 W/10 s at posterior wall. In CBA group, 28 mm s generation cryoballoon was used for PVI according the guidelines. Results: There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between these 2 groups. The time to achieve PVI was significantly shorter in cryoballoon ablation group than in HPSD group (20.6 ± 1.7 min vs 51.8 ± 36.3, P = 0.001). The 6-month overall recurrence for atrial tachyarrhythmias was not significantly different between the two groups (HPSD:14.50% vs CBA:11.0%, P = 0.40). There were different types of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia between these 2 groups. Recurrence as atrial flutter was significantly more common in CBA group compared to HPSD group (57.1% vs 12.5%, P = 0.04). Conclusion: In PAF patients, CBA and HPSD had a favourable and comparable outcome. The recurrence pattern was different between CBA and HPSD groups.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:59:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-668a8375273f4a3bbfca3c018031425a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-6292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:59:02Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
spelling doaj.art-668a8375273f4a3bbfca3c018031425a2023-06-22T05:02:25ZengElsevierIndian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal0972-62922023-07-01234110115Comparison of efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation between cryoballoon ablation and high-power short-duration ablationAnkit Jain0Chun-Chao Chen1Shih-Lin Chang2Yenn-Jiang Lin3Li-Wei Lo4Yu-Feng Hu5Fa-Po Chung6Chin-Yu Lin7Ting-Yung Chang8Ta-Chuan Tuan9Tze-Fan Chao10Jo-Nan Liao11Chih-Min Liu12Cheng-I Wu13Chye-Gen Chin14Wen-Han Cheng15Shin-Huei Liu16Ching-Yao Chou17Isaiah C. Lugtu18Shih-Ann Chen19Heart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Vardhman Mahavir, Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IndiaHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Corresponding author. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan.Heart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanHeart Rhythm Centre and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Cardiovascular Centre, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; College of Medicine, Chung Hsing University, Taichung, TaiwanBackground: High-power short-duration (HPSD) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA) has been used for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Objective: We aimed to compare the efficacy of PVI between CBA and HPSD ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 251 consecutive PAF patients from January 2018 to July 2020. Of them, 124 patients (mean age 57.2 ± 10.1 year) received HPSD and 127 patients (mean age 59.6 ± 9.4 year) received CBA. In HPSD group, the radiofrequency energy was set as 50 W/10 s at anterior wall and 40 W/10 s at posterior wall. In CBA group, 28 mm s generation cryoballoon was used for PVI according the guidelines. Results: There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between these 2 groups. The time to achieve PVI was significantly shorter in cryoballoon ablation group than in HPSD group (20.6 ± 1.7 min vs 51.8 ± 36.3, P = 0.001). The 6-month overall recurrence for atrial tachyarrhythmias was not significantly different between the two groups (HPSD:14.50% vs CBA:11.0%, P = 0.40). There were different types of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia between these 2 groups. Recurrence as atrial flutter was significantly more common in CBA group compared to HPSD group (57.1% vs 12.5%, P = 0.04). Conclusion: In PAF patients, CBA and HPSD had a favourable and comparable outcome. The recurrence pattern was different between CBA and HPSD groups.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629223000402Atrial fibrillationPulmonary vein isolationHigh power short duration ablationCryoballoon ablationRecurrence
spellingShingle Ankit Jain
Chun-Chao Chen
Shih-Lin Chang
Yenn-Jiang Lin
Li-Wei Lo
Yu-Feng Hu
Fa-Po Chung
Chin-Yu Lin
Ting-Yung Chang
Ta-Chuan Tuan
Tze-Fan Chao
Jo-Nan Liao
Chih-Min Liu
Cheng-I Wu
Chye-Gen Chin
Wen-Han Cheng
Shin-Huei Liu
Ching-Yao Chou
Isaiah C. Lugtu
Shih-Ann Chen
Comparison of efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation between cryoballoon ablation and high-power short-duration ablation
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Atrial fibrillation
Pulmonary vein isolation
High power short duration ablation
Cryoballoon ablation
Recurrence
title Comparison of efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation between cryoballoon ablation and high-power short-duration ablation
title_full Comparison of efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation between cryoballoon ablation and high-power short-duration ablation
title_fullStr Comparison of efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation between cryoballoon ablation and high-power short-duration ablation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation between cryoballoon ablation and high-power short-duration ablation
title_short Comparison of efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation between cryoballoon ablation and high-power short-duration ablation
title_sort comparison of efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation between cryoballoon ablation and high power short duration ablation
topic Atrial fibrillation
Pulmonary vein isolation
High power short duration ablation
Cryoballoon ablation
Recurrence
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629223000402
work_keys_str_mv AT ankitjain comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT chunchaochen comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT shihlinchang comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT yennjianglin comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT liweilo comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT yufenghu comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT fapochung comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT chinyulin comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT tingyungchang comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT tachuantuan comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT tzefanchao comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT jonanliao comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT chihminliu comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT chengiwu comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT chyegenchin comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT wenhancheng comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT shinhueiliu comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT chingyaochou comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT isaiahclugtu comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation
AT shihannchen comparisonofefficacyofpulmonaryveinisolationbetweencryoballoonablationandhighpowershortdurationablation