Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and Fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and Fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) patients.The PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of science databases were searched for s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huanming Xiao, Meijie Shi, Yubao Xie, Xiaoling Chi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5673175?pdf=render
_version_ 1818586382655815680
author Huanming Xiao
Meijie Shi
Yubao Xie
Xiaoling Chi
author_facet Huanming Xiao
Meijie Shi
Yubao Xie
Xiaoling Chi
author_sort Huanming Xiao
collection DOAJ
description This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and Fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) patients.The PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of science databases were searched for studies that evaluated the diagnostic value of MRE and Fibroscan for liver fibrosis in CHB patients until March 1st 2017. The quality of the included studies was assessed by the revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy tool (QUADAS-2). Meta-disc 4.1 was used to summary the area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios to assess the accuracy of staging liver fibrosis using MRE and Fibroscan.A total of nine MRE studies with 1470 patients and fifteen Fibroscan studies with 3641 patients were included in this systematic review. The summary AUROC values using MRE and Fibroscan for detecting significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were 0.981 vs. 0.796(p<0.001), 0.972 vs. 0.893(p<0.001), and 0.972 vs. 0.905 (p<0.001). The pooled sensitivity and specificity using MRE for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were 92.8% and 93.7%, 89.6% and 93.2%, 89.5% and 92.0%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity using Fibroscan for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were 71.6% and 81.6%, 79.0% and 84.6%, 80.0% and 86.6%, respectively.MRE is more accurate than Fibroscan in diagnosing liver fibrosis in CHB patients, especially in diagnosing significant fibrosis and advanced fibrosis.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T08:52:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-669933aa3d1441328d71fef1d0baec79
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T08:52:05Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-669933aa3d1441328d71fef1d0baec792022-12-21T22:37:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-011211e018666010.1371/journal.pone.0186660Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and Fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Huanming XiaoMeijie ShiYubao XieXiaoling ChiThis systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and Fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) patients.The PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of science databases were searched for studies that evaluated the diagnostic value of MRE and Fibroscan for liver fibrosis in CHB patients until March 1st 2017. The quality of the included studies was assessed by the revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy tool (QUADAS-2). Meta-disc 4.1 was used to summary the area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios to assess the accuracy of staging liver fibrosis using MRE and Fibroscan.A total of nine MRE studies with 1470 patients and fifteen Fibroscan studies with 3641 patients were included in this systematic review. The summary AUROC values using MRE and Fibroscan for detecting significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were 0.981 vs. 0.796(p<0.001), 0.972 vs. 0.893(p<0.001), and 0.972 vs. 0.905 (p<0.001). The pooled sensitivity and specificity using MRE for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were 92.8% and 93.7%, 89.6% and 93.2%, 89.5% and 92.0%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity using Fibroscan for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were 71.6% and 81.6%, 79.0% and 84.6%, 80.0% and 86.6%, respectively.MRE is more accurate than Fibroscan in diagnosing liver fibrosis in CHB patients, especially in diagnosing significant fibrosis and advanced fibrosis.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5673175?pdf=render
spellingShingle Huanming Xiao
Meijie Shi
Yubao Xie
Xiaoling Chi
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and Fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and Fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and Fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and Fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and Fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and Fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort comparison of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography and fibroscan for detecting liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis b patients a systematic review and meta analysis
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5673175?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT huanmingxiao comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandfibroscanfordetectingliverfibrosisinchronichepatitisbpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT meijieshi comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandfibroscanfordetectingliverfibrosisinchronichepatitisbpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yubaoxie comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandfibroscanfordetectingliverfibrosisinchronichepatitisbpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaolingchi comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyofmagneticresonanceelastographyandfibroscanfordetectingliverfibrosisinchronichepatitisbpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis