Collaborative Creation of a Lab Rubric

While there are a number of tested rubrics in circulation, our task was to intervene in a particular situation: the lead professor was concerned because her graduate teaching assistants held negative views about student performance on the lab reports. GTAs found poor products frustrating, and admitt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carrie Miller-DeBoer, Michele Eodice
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society for Microbiology 2011-01-01
Series:Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
Online Access:https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v12i1.271
_version_ 1818932353228079104
author Carrie Miller-DeBoer
Michele Eodice
author_facet Carrie Miller-DeBoer
Michele Eodice
author_sort Carrie Miller-DeBoer
collection DOAJ
description While there are a number of tested rubrics in circulation, our task was to intervene in a particular situation: the lead professor was concerned because her graduate teaching assistants held negative views about student performance on the lab reports. GTAs found poor products frustrating, and admitted that their grading was thus superficial and provided no feedback to students. Specifically, GTAs did not feel equipped to evaluate writing and, as a result, simply graded on steps completed in the lab process. We have a rubric now for an Introduction to Zoology lab that could be submitted here as a pretty darn good rubric for other instructors to use. But the intent of our “Tips and Tools” is to describe the actual creation of the rubric. We believe the active “real time” development of the rubric carried as much or more value than the finished product.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T04:31:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-66ac868f90bd4544b82402f0c38231e9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1935-7877
1935-7885
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T04:31:08Z
publishDate 2011-01-01
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format Article
series Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
spelling doaj.art-66ac868f90bd4544b82402f0c38231e92022-12-21T19:53:22ZengAmerican Society for MicrobiologyJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education1935-78771935-78852011-01-01121676810.1128/jmbe.v12i1.271Collaborative Creation of a Lab RubricCarrie Miller-DeBoer0Michele Eodice1Department of Zoology University of Oklahoma andLearning, Teaching, & Writing University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019While there are a number of tested rubrics in circulation, our task was to intervene in a particular situation: the lead professor was concerned because her graduate teaching assistants held negative views about student performance on the lab reports. GTAs found poor products frustrating, and admitted that their grading was thus superficial and provided no feedback to students. Specifically, GTAs did not feel equipped to evaluate writing and, as a result, simply graded on steps completed in the lab process. We have a rubric now for an Introduction to Zoology lab that could be submitted here as a pretty darn good rubric for other instructors to use. But the intent of our “Tips and Tools” is to describe the actual creation of the rubric. We believe the active “real time” development of the rubric carried as much or more value than the finished product.https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v12i1.271
spellingShingle Carrie Miller-DeBoer
Michele Eodice
Collaborative Creation of a Lab Rubric
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
title Collaborative Creation of a Lab Rubric
title_full Collaborative Creation of a Lab Rubric
title_fullStr Collaborative Creation of a Lab Rubric
title_full_unstemmed Collaborative Creation of a Lab Rubric
title_short Collaborative Creation of a Lab Rubric
title_sort collaborative creation of a lab rubric
url https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v12i1.271
work_keys_str_mv AT carriemillerdeboer collaborativecreationofalabrubric
AT micheleeodice collaborativecreationofalabrubric