Application of a scoring system in Japanese patients diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome to assess the relationship between the score and clinical responses to eculizumab

Abstract Background Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is caused by complement dysregulation and is generally diagnosed by exclusion from other disorders of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Eculizumab, a terminal complement inhibitor, has been approved for aHUS treatment since 2013 in Japan....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hideo Wada, Hirofumi Teranishi, Akihiko Shimono, Noritoshi Kato, Shoichi Maruyama, Masanori Matsumoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-04-01
Series:Thrombosis Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-023-00489-0
_version_ 1797840854804594688
author Hideo Wada
Hirofumi Teranishi
Akihiko Shimono
Noritoshi Kato
Shoichi Maruyama
Masanori Matsumoto
author_facet Hideo Wada
Hirofumi Teranishi
Akihiko Shimono
Noritoshi Kato
Shoichi Maruyama
Masanori Matsumoto
author_sort Hideo Wada
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is caused by complement dysregulation and is generally diagnosed by exclusion from other disorders of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Eculizumab, a terminal complement inhibitor, has been approved for aHUS treatment since 2013 in Japan. Recently, a scoring system was published to support diagnosis of aHUS. Herein we modified this scoring system to apply it to patients diagnosed with aHUS and treated with eculizumab, and assessed the association between the score and clinical responses to eculizumab. Methods One hundred eighty-eight Japanese patients who were clinically diagnosed with aHUS, treated with eculizumab, and enrolled in post-marketing surveillance (PMS) were included in this analysis. Some of parameters in the original scoring system were replaced with clinically similar parameters collected in the PMS to modify the system, hereafter referred to as the TMA/aHUS score, which ranges from -15 to 20 points. Treatment responses within 90 days after eculizumab initiation were also assessed, and the relationship between treatment response and TMA/aHUS scores calculated at TMA onset was explored. Results The median (range) TMA/aHUS score was 10 (3–16). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of TMA/aHUS score to predict treatment response to eculizumab was estimated as 10, and negative predictive value indicated that ≥ 5 points was appropriate to consider assessing the treatment response to eculizumab; 185 (98%) patients had ≥ 5 points and 3 (2%) had < 5 points. Among the patients with ≥ 5 points, 96.1% showed partial response and 31.1% showed complete response. One of the three patients with < 5 points met partial response criteria. No significant difference in the TMA/aHUS scores was observed between survivors and non-survivors, suggesting that the score was not appropriate to predict the outcome (i.e., survival/death) in patients treated with eculizumab. Conclusion Almost all patients clinically diagnosed with aHUS scored ≥ 5 points and responded to eculizumab. The TMA/aHUS score system could become a supporting tool for the clinical diagnosis of aHUS and probability of response to treatment with a C5 inhibitor. Trial registration This study was conducted as per good PMS practice guidelines for drugs (MHLW Ministerial Ordinance No. 171 of 2004).
first_indexed 2024-04-09T16:21:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-66b814ce2378458b8ffc03d94ff1015a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-9560
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T16:21:32Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Thrombosis Journal
spelling doaj.art-66b814ce2378458b8ffc03d94ff1015a2023-04-23T11:25:51ZengBMCThrombosis Journal1477-95602023-04-0121111210.1186/s12959-023-00489-0Application of a scoring system in Japanese patients diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome to assess the relationship between the score and clinical responses to eculizumabHideo Wada0Hirofumi Teranishi1Akihiko Shimono2Noritoshi Kato3Shoichi Maruyama4Masanori Matsumoto5Department of General and Laboratory Medicine, Mie Prefectural General Medical CenterAlexion Pharma GKAlexion Pharma GKDepartment of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of MedicineDepartment of Blood Transfusion Medicine, Nara Medical UniversityAbstract Background Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is caused by complement dysregulation and is generally diagnosed by exclusion from other disorders of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Eculizumab, a terminal complement inhibitor, has been approved for aHUS treatment since 2013 in Japan. Recently, a scoring system was published to support diagnosis of aHUS. Herein we modified this scoring system to apply it to patients diagnosed with aHUS and treated with eculizumab, and assessed the association between the score and clinical responses to eculizumab. Methods One hundred eighty-eight Japanese patients who were clinically diagnosed with aHUS, treated with eculizumab, and enrolled in post-marketing surveillance (PMS) were included in this analysis. Some of parameters in the original scoring system were replaced with clinically similar parameters collected in the PMS to modify the system, hereafter referred to as the TMA/aHUS score, which ranges from -15 to 20 points. Treatment responses within 90 days after eculizumab initiation were also assessed, and the relationship between treatment response and TMA/aHUS scores calculated at TMA onset was explored. Results The median (range) TMA/aHUS score was 10 (3–16). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of TMA/aHUS score to predict treatment response to eculizumab was estimated as 10, and negative predictive value indicated that ≥ 5 points was appropriate to consider assessing the treatment response to eculizumab; 185 (98%) patients had ≥ 5 points and 3 (2%) had < 5 points. Among the patients with ≥ 5 points, 96.1% showed partial response and 31.1% showed complete response. One of the three patients with < 5 points met partial response criteria. No significant difference in the TMA/aHUS scores was observed between survivors and non-survivors, suggesting that the score was not appropriate to predict the outcome (i.e., survival/death) in patients treated with eculizumab. Conclusion Almost all patients clinically diagnosed with aHUS scored ≥ 5 points and responded to eculizumab. The TMA/aHUS score system could become a supporting tool for the clinical diagnosis of aHUS and probability of response to treatment with a C5 inhibitor. Trial registration This study was conducted as per good PMS practice guidelines for drugs (MHLW Ministerial Ordinance No. 171 of 2004).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-023-00489-0Atypical hemolytic uremic syndromeClassificationDiagnosisEculizumabThrombotic microangiopathyPost-marketing surveillance
spellingShingle Hideo Wada
Hirofumi Teranishi
Akihiko Shimono
Noritoshi Kato
Shoichi Maruyama
Masanori Matsumoto
Application of a scoring system in Japanese patients diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome to assess the relationship between the score and clinical responses to eculizumab
Thrombosis Journal
Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome
Classification
Diagnosis
Eculizumab
Thrombotic microangiopathy
Post-marketing surveillance
title Application of a scoring system in Japanese patients diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome to assess the relationship between the score and clinical responses to eculizumab
title_full Application of a scoring system in Japanese patients diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome to assess the relationship between the score and clinical responses to eculizumab
title_fullStr Application of a scoring system in Japanese patients diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome to assess the relationship between the score and clinical responses to eculizumab
title_full_unstemmed Application of a scoring system in Japanese patients diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome to assess the relationship between the score and clinical responses to eculizumab
title_short Application of a scoring system in Japanese patients diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome to assess the relationship between the score and clinical responses to eculizumab
title_sort application of a scoring system in japanese patients diagnosed with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome to assess the relationship between the score and clinical responses to eculizumab
topic Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome
Classification
Diagnosis
Eculizumab
Thrombotic microangiopathy
Post-marketing surveillance
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-023-00489-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hideowada applicationofascoringsysteminjapanesepatientsdiagnosedwithatypicalhemolyticuremicsyndrometoassesstherelationshipbetweenthescoreandclinicalresponsestoeculizumab
AT hirofumiteranishi applicationofascoringsysteminjapanesepatientsdiagnosedwithatypicalhemolyticuremicsyndrometoassesstherelationshipbetweenthescoreandclinicalresponsestoeculizumab
AT akihikoshimono applicationofascoringsysteminjapanesepatientsdiagnosedwithatypicalhemolyticuremicsyndrometoassesstherelationshipbetweenthescoreandclinicalresponsestoeculizumab
AT noritoshikato applicationofascoringsysteminjapanesepatientsdiagnosedwithatypicalhemolyticuremicsyndrometoassesstherelationshipbetweenthescoreandclinicalresponsestoeculizumab
AT shoichimaruyama applicationofascoringsysteminjapanesepatientsdiagnosedwithatypicalhemolyticuremicsyndrometoassesstherelationshipbetweenthescoreandclinicalresponsestoeculizumab
AT masanorimatsumoto applicationofascoringsysteminjapanesepatientsdiagnosedwithatypicalhemolyticuremicsyndrometoassesstherelationshipbetweenthescoreandclinicalresponsestoeculizumab