The Romanian Agriculture Cooperative Movement, from the Beginning to the Threshold of the Second World War. Briefly Historic Argument or Argument for History

In the philosophical meaning, the cooperative is a result of the knowing experimentally development and includes the interaction between: persons of consequence – through ideas and attitudes, state – through laws and institutes, experiences – through structures and effects. In Romania, in the first...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriel Popescu, Florentina Constantin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: General Association of Economists from Romania 2007-08-01
Series:Theoretical and Applied Economics
Subjects:
Online Access: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/241.pdf
_version_ 1811316088893341696
author Gabriel Popescu
Florentina Constantin
author_facet Gabriel Popescu
Florentina Constantin
author_sort Gabriel Popescu
collection DOAJ
description In the philosophical meaning, the cooperative is a result of the knowing experimentally development and includes the interaction between: persons of consequence – through ideas and attitudes, state – through laws and institutes, experiences – through structures and effects. In Romania, in the first half of the XIXth century, and to the threshold of the Second World War, are remarked numerous persons of consequence who promote and support the cooperative movement, such as P.S. Aurelian, Spiru Haret, Ion Raducanu, Virgil Madgearu, Mitita Constantinescu and Nicolae Cornateanu. The state has accepted the cooperative as an instrument of the democratization of the capital and profit. The cooperative movement had fight continuously towards promotion of the collaboration principle between cooperative companies, principle by virtue of which the organizations can manifest independence in confrontation with the state. The experiences had been substantiated mostly on the ideology of modern cooperative systems: Rochdale, Raiffaisen and Schulttze. The Romanian cooperative movement appeared, just like in the majority of European states, on a background of some restrictions in the agricultural field, generated by a complex of factors among which the main position in a constant way had been hold by the contest between the big and small agricultural farms. In Romania, during the period before and after-war, cooperatives’ organization worked successfully as credit cooperatives or economical cooperatives (consumption cooperatives, supply and sale cooperatives, forestry cooperatives, purchase community, leasing community, etc.). The various shapes of the cooperative movements shows the potential which those have had in the purpose of their economical development and social situation improvement of the farmers. The potential was narrowed not only by the legislative and institutional instability, but more by the agricultural market size and intensity. The cooperatives activities efficiency was depending, before all, on the economic and social environment within which they were acting. But the economic environment was imposing as market partner, the farm as an economic-social entity with autarchic behaviour. In consequence the cooperative sector’s performances were conditioned by the farms’ performances.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T11:42:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-66d9710fcb254b80bc390283822263a7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1841-8678
1844-0029
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T11:42:42Z
publishDate 2007-08-01
publisher General Association of Economists from Romania
record_format Article
series Theoretical and Applied Economics
spelling doaj.art-66d9710fcb254b80bc390283822263a72022-12-22T02:48:16ZengGeneral Association of Economists from RomaniaTheoretical and Applied Economics1841-86781844-00292007-08-01XIV818418678The Romanian Agriculture Cooperative Movement, from the Beginning to the Threshold of the Second World War. Briefly Historic Argument or Argument for HistoryGabriel Popescu0Florentina Constantin1 Academia de Studii Economice, Bucuresti In the philosophical meaning, the cooperative is a result of the knowing experimentally development and includes the interaction between: persons of consequence – through ideas and attitudes, state – through laws and institutes, experiences – through structures and effects. In Romania, in the first half of the XIXth century, and to the threshold of the Second World War, are remarked numerous persons of consequence who promote and support the cooperative movement, such as P.S. Aurelian, Spiru Haret, Ion Raducanu, Virgil Madgearu, Mitita Constantinescu and Nicolae Cornateanu. The state has accepted the cooperative as an instrument of the democratization of the capital and profit. The cooperative movement had fight continuously towards promotion of the collaboration principle between cooperative companies, principle by virtue of which the organizations can manifest independence in confrontation with the state. The experiences had been substantiated mostly on the ideology of modern cooperative systems: Rochdale, Raiffaisen and Schulttze. The Romanian cooperative movement appeared, just like in the majority of European states, on a background of some restrictions in the agricultural field, generated by a complex of factors among which the main position in a constant way had been hold by the contest between the big and small agricultural farms. In Romania, during the period before and after-war, cooperatives’ organization worked successfully as credit cooperatives or economical cooperatives (consumption cooperatives, supply and sale cooperatives, forestry cooperatives, purchase community, leasing community, etc.). The various shapes of the cooperative movements shows the potential which those have had in the purpose of their economical development and social situation improvement of the farmers. The potential was narrowed not only by the legislative and institutional instability, but more by the agricultural market size and intensity. The cooperatives activities efficiency was depending, before all, on the economic and social environment within which they were acting. But the economic environment was imposing as market partner, the farm as an economic-social entity with autarchic behaviour. In consequence the cooperative sector’s performances were conditioned by the farms’ performances. http://store.ectap.ro/articole/241.pdf agricultural cooperationRochdale pioneersbanking cooperativesconsumers’ cooperativesproducing cooperatives
spellingShingle Gabriel Popescu
Florentina Constantin
The Romanian Agriculture Cooperative Movement, from the Beginning to the Threshold of the Second World War. Briefly Historic Argument or Argument for History
Theoretical and Applied Economics
agricultural cooperation
Rochdale pioneers
banking cooperatives
consumers’ cooperatives
producing cooperatives
title The Romanian Agriculture Cooperative Movement, from the Beginning to the Threshold of the Second World War. Briefly Historic Argument or Argument for History
title_full The Romanian Agriculture Cooperative Movement, from the Beginning to the Threshold of the Second World War. Briefly Historic Argument or Argument for History
title_fullStr The Romanian Agriculture Cooperative Movement, from the Beginning to the Threshold of the Second World War. Briefly Historic Argument or Argument for History
title_full_unstemmed The Romanian Agriculture Cooperative Movement, from the Beginning to the Threshold of the Second World War. Briefly Historic Argument or Argument for History
title_short The Romanian Agriculture Cooperative Movement, from the Beginning to the Threshold of the Second World War. Briefly Historic Argument or Argument for History
title_sort romanian agriculture cooperative movement from the beginning to the threshold of the second world war briefly historic argument or argument for history
topic agricultural cooperation
Rochdale pioneers
banking cooperatives
consumers’ cooperatives
producing cooperatives
url http://store.ectap.ro/articole/241.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielpopescu theromanianagriculturecooperativemovementfromthebeginningtothethresholdofthesecondworldwarbrieflyhistoricargumentorargumentforhistory
AT florentinaconstantin theromanianagriculturecooperativemovementfromthebeginningtothethresholdofthesecondworldwarbrieflyhistoricargumentorargumentforhistory
AT gabrielpopescu romanianagriculturecooperativemovementfromthebeginningtothethresholdofthesecondworldwarbrieflyhistoricargumentorargumentforhistory
AT florentinaconstantin romanianagriculturecooperativemovementfromthebeginningtothethresholdofthesecondworldwarbrieflyhistoricargumentorargumentforhistory