Percutaneous monoplanar screws versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws in intermediate screw fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a case–control study

Abstract Background To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of monoplanar screws (MSs) versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws (HSs) in percutaneous short-segment intermediate screw fixation (PSISF) for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures (TTBFs) in patients without neurologic i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yaozheng Han, Jun Ma, Guoquan Zhang, Liangliang Huang, Hui Kang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04547-9
_version_ 1797276399527002112
author Yaozheng Han
Jun Ma
Guoquan Zhang
Liangliang Huang
Hui Kang
author_facet Yaozheng Han
Jun Ma
Guoquan Zhang
Liangliang Huang
Hui Kang
author_sort Yaozheng Han
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of monoplanar screws (MSs) versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws (HSs) in percutaneous short-segment intermediate screw fixation (PSISF) for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures (TTBFs) in patients without neurologic impairment. Methods A consecutive series of 100 patients with single-segment TTBFs and no neurologic impairment who underwent PSISF with 6 monoplanar screws (MS group) or correct were retrospectively enrolled. The demographic data, radiologic evaluation indicators, perioperative indicators and clinical assessment indicators were analysed between the MS group and HS group. Results The demographic data and perioperative indicators were not significantly different in the two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative anterior vertebral height ratio (AVHR), kyphosis Cobb angle (KCA), vertebral wedge angle (VWA) and spinal canal encroachment rate (SCER) were significantly improved in both groups (*P < 0.05). The MS group obtained better correction than the HS group in terms of improvement in the AVHR, KCA and VWA after surgery (*P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the MS group had less correction loss of AVHR, KCA and VWA (*P < 0.05). The MS group presented greater improvement in the SCER at the last follow-up (*P < 0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of all patients were significantly better postoperatively than those preoperatively (*P < 0.05), and the scores collected at each follow-up visit did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the MS group, no internal fixation failure was observed during the follow-up period, but, in the HS group, two cases of internal fixation failure were observed at the last follow-up (one case of rod loosening and one case of screw breakage). Conclusions Both MSs and HSs fixation are effective treatments for TTBFs and have comparable clinical outcomes. In contrast, MSs fixation can improve the correction effect, better improve the SCER, and further reduce correction loss as well as reduce the incidence of instrumentation failure. Therefore, MSs fixation might be a better option for treating TTBFs in patients without neurological deficits.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:27:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-66da995d621349618abfa55c888c2b10
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T15:27:45Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-66da995d621349618abfa55c888c2b102024-03-05T16:36:16ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2024-01-0119111010.1186/s13018-024-04547-9Percutaneous monoplanar screws versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws in intermediate screw fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a case–control studyYaozheng Han0Jun Ma1Guoquan Zhang2Liangliang Huang3Hui Kang4Medical College, Wuhan University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Orthopaedic, General Hospital of Central Theater CommandMedical College, Hubei University of MedicineDepartment of Orthopaedic, General Hospital of Central Theater CommandDepartment of Orthopaedic, General Hospital of Central Theater CommandAbstract Background To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of monoplanar screws (MSs) versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws (HSs) in percutaneous short-segment intermediate screw fixation (PSISF) for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures (TTBFs) in patients without neurologic impairment. Methods A consecutive series of 100 patients with single-segment TTBFs and no neurologic impairment who underwent PSISF with 6 monoplanar screws (MS group) or correct were retrospectively enrolled. The demographic data, radiologic evaluation indicators, perioperative indicators and clinical assessment indicators were analysed between the MS group and HS group. Results The demographic data and perioperative indicators were not significantly different in the two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative anterior vertebral height ratio (AVHR), kyphosis Cobb angle (KCA), vertebral wedge angle (VWA) and spinal canal encroachment rate (SCER) were significantly improved in both groups (*P < 0.05). The MS group obtained better correction than the HS group in terms of improvement in the AVHR, KCA and VWA after surgery (*P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the MS group had less correction loss of AVHR, KCA and VWA (*P < 0.05). The MS group presented greater improvement in the SCER at the last follow-up (*P < 0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of all patients were significantly better postoperatively than those preoperatively (*P < 0.05), and the scores collected at each follow-up visit did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the MS group, no internal fixation failure was observed during the follow-up period, but, in the HS group, two cases of internal fixation failure were observed at the last follow-up (one case of rod loosening and one case of screw breakage). Conclusions Both MSs and HSs fixation are effective treatments for TTBFs and have comparable clinical outcomes. In contrast, MSs fixation can improve the correction effect, better improve the SCER, and further reduce correction loss as well as reduce the incidence of instrumentation failure. Therefore, MSs fixation might be a better option for treating TTBFs in patients without neurological deficits.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04547-9Thoracolumbar burst fracturesMonoplanar pedicle screwsHybrid fixed axial and polyaxial pedicle screwsIntermediate screw fixationPercutaneous pedicle screw fixation
spellingShingle Yaozheng Han
Jun Ma
Guoquan Zhang
Liangliang Huang
Hui Kang
Percutaneous monoplanar screws versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws in intermediate screw fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a case–control study
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Thoracolumbar burst fractures
Monoplanar pedicle screws
Hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial pedicle screws
Intermediate screw fixation
Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation
title Percutaneous monoplanar screws versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws in intermediate screw fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a case–control study
title_full Percutaneous monoplanar screws versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws in intermediate screw fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a case–control study
title_fullStr Percutaneous monoplanar screws versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws in intermediate screw fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous monoplanar screws versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws in intermediate screw fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a case–control study
title_short Percutaneous monoplanar screws versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws in intermediate screw fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a case–control study
title_sort percutaneous monoplanar screws versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws in intermediate screw fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures a case control study
topic Thoracolumbar burst fractures
Monoplanar pedicle screws
Hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial pedicle screws
Intermediate screw fixation
Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04547-9
work_keys_str_mv AT yaozhenghan percutaneousmonoplanarscrewsversushybridfixedaxialandpolyaxialscrewsinintermediatescrewfixationfortraumaticthoracolumbarburstfracturesacasecontrolstudy
AT junma percutaneousmonoplanarscrewsversushybridfixedaxialandpolyaxialscrewsinintermediatescrewfixationfortraumaticthoracolumbarburstfracturesacasecontrolstudy
AT guoquanzhang percutaneousmonoplanarscrewsversushybridfixedaxialandpolyaxialscrewsinintermediatescrewfixationfortraumaticthoracolumbarburstfracturesacasecontrolstudy
AT lianglianghuang percutaneousmonoplanarscrewsversushybridfixedaxialandpolyaxialscrewsinintermediatescrewfixationfortraumaticthoracolumbarburstfracturesacasecontrolstudy
AT huikang percutaneousmonoplanarscrewsversushybridfixedaxialandpolyaxialscrewsinintermediatescrewfixationfortraumaticthoracolumbarburstfracturesacasecontrolstudy