COMPARSION BETWEEN PANORAMIC PERIAPICAL AND VERTICAL BITEWING RADIOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF PERIODONTAL BONE LOSS
Introduction. For diagnosis and treatment planing and detection the quality of remaining Alveolar bone the radiography is very useful so the type of radiography is very important. The purpose of this study is the comparison between panoramic, periapical (bisecting technique) and vertical bitewing ra...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2000-09-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Research in Medical Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/3527 |
| _version_ | 1818084139088216064 |
|---|---|
| author | M SHEIKHI V DAVOODI P ZIAIE MOGHADDAM |
| author_facet | M SHEIKHI V DAVOODI P ZIAIE MOGHADDAM |
| author_sort | M SHEIKHI |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction. For diagnosis and treatment planing and detection the quality of remaining Alveolar bone the radiography is very useful so the type of radiography is very important. The purpose of this study is the comparison between panoramic, periapical (bisecting technique) and vertical bitewing radiographs in diagnosis of periodontitis. Methods. Twelve patients (3 male and 9 female) with a mean age of 35, with a moderate to advanced periodontitis were evaluated. At the time of periodontal surgery, in the posterior site of two jaws (in 6 and 7 teeth), the bone loss was measured from CEJ to the base of alveolar bone, and compared with the radiographic findings of proximal bone loss. Results. The average of distance between CEJ and alveolar bone in 48 surfaces were 4.27 in clinic, 4.80 in panoramic, 2.62 in periapical (bisecting technique), 2.98 in vertical bitewing and 4.05 in panoramic without magnification. Discussion. In this research we cancluded that both techniques (periapical and vertical bitewing) are not accurate in detection of proximal bone loss and there was significant difference between quantity of proximal bone in clinical measurment than radiographic measurment and this study showed that the panoramic (specially panoramic without magnification) is more careful than other radiographic techniques in detection of proximal bone loss. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T19:49:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-66f416c74e63406e9fb03f0eab8fd8db |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1735-1995 1735-7136 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T19:49:08Z |
| publishDate | 2000-09-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Research in Medical Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-66f416c74e63406e9fb03f0eab8fd8db2022-12-22T01:35:49ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362000-09-0153COMPARSION BETWEEN PANORAMIC PERIAPICAL AND VERTICAL BITEWING RADIOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF PERIODONTAL BONE LOSSM SHEIKHIV DAVOODIP ZIAIE MOGHADDAMIntroduction. For diagnosis and treatment planing and detection the quality of remaining Alveolar bone the radiography is very useful so the type of radiography is very important. The purpose of this study is the comparison between panoramic, periapical (bisecting technique) and vertical bitewing radiographs in diagnosis of periodontitis. Methods. Twelve patients (3 male and 9 female) with a mean age of 35, with a moderate to advanced periodontitis were evaluated. At the time of periodontal surgery, in the posterior site of two jaws (in 6 and 7 teeth), the bone loss was measured from CEJ to the base of alveolar bone, and compared with the radiographic findings of proximal bone loss. Results. The average of distance between CEJ and alveolar bone in 48 surfaces were 4.27 in clinic, 4.80 in panoramic, 2.62 in periapical (bisecting technique), 2.98 in vertical bitewing and 4.05 in panoramic without magnification. Discussion. In this research we cancluded that both techniques (periapical and vertical bitewing) are not accurate in detection of proximal bone loss and there was significant difference between quantity of proximal bone in clinical measurment than radiographic measurment and this study showed that the panoramic (specially panoramic without magnification) is more careful than other radiographic techniques in detection of proximal bone loss.http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/3527Vertical bitewing, Periapical, Radiography, Periodontitis, Panoramic |
| spellingShingle | M SHEIKHI V DAVOODI P ZIAIE MOGHADDAM COMPARSION BETWEEN PANORAMIC PERIAPICAL AND VERTICAL BITEWING RADIOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF PERIODONTAL BONE LOSS Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Vertical bitewing, Periapical, Radiography, Periodontitis, Panoramic |
| title | COMPARSION BETWEEN PANORAMIC PERIAPICAL AND VERTICAL BITEWING RADIOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF PERIODONTAL BONE LOSS |
| title_full | COMPARSION BETWEEN PANORAMIC PERIAPICAL AND VERTICAL BITEWING RADIOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF PERIODONTAL BONE LOSS |
| title_fullStr | COMPARSION BETWEEN PANORAMIC PERIAPICAL AND VERTICAL BITEWING RADIOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF PERIODONTAL BONE LOSS |
| title_full_unstemmed | COMPARSION BETWEEN PANORAMIC PERIAPICAL AND VERTICAL BITEWING RADIOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF PERIODONTAL BONE LOSS |
| title_short | COMPARSION BETWEEN PANORAMIC PERIAPICAL AND VERTICAL BITEWING RADIOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF PERIODONTAL BONE LOSS |
| title_sort | comparsion between panoramic periapical and vertical bitewing radiography in diagnosis of periodontal bone loss |
| topic | Vertical bitewing, Periapical, Radiography, Periodontitis, Panoramic |
| url | http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/3527 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT msheikhi comparsionbetweenpanoramicperiapicalandverticalbitewingradiographyindiagnosisofperiodontalboneloss AT vdavoodi comparsionbetweenpanoramicperiapicalandverticalbitewingradiographyindiagnosisofperiodontalboneloss AT pziaiemoghaddam comparsionbetweenpanoramicperiapicalandverticalbitewingradiographyindiagnosisofperiodontalboneloss |