10.3 USE OF MICROLIFE BP WATCH IS A FEASIBLE APPROACH TO DETERMINE INTER-ARM BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCES IN A CLINICAL SETTING

Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of Microlife Watch BP for measuring bilateral blood pressure (BP) in a clinical setting. Method: 339 patients (85% diabetic) scheduled for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at the outpatient clinic for endocrinology, Silkeborg Regional Ho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christoffer Krogager, Esben Laugesen, Niklas B. Rossen, Per L. Poulsen, Mogens Erlandsen, Klavs W. Hansen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2016-11-01
Series:Artery Research
Online Access:https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930461/view
_version_ 1811300746217390080
author Christoffer Krogager
Esben Laugesen
Niklas B. Rossen
Per L. Poulsen
Mogens Erlandsen
Klavs W. Hansen
author_facet Christoffer Krogager
Esben Laugesen
Niklas B. Rossen
Per L. Poulsen
Mogens Erlandsen
Klavs W. Hansen
author_sort Christoffer Krogager
collection DOAJ
description Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of Microlife Watch BP for measuring bilateral blood pressure (BP) in a clinical setting. Method: 339 patients (85% diabetic) scheduled for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at the outpatient clinic for endocrinology, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, were examined with simultaneously bilateral BP measurements. A fully automatic, oscillometric device was used and two successive measurements were made. Results: 9,1% of the patients had a clinically significant inter-arm blood pressure difference (IAD) of ≥10mmHg in the first set of measurements. Mean IAD in the first measurement was -0,3mmHg 6.6. Twenty-three patients had a normal IAD in the first set of measurements but IAD ≥10mmHg in the second set of measurements. Only one of the patients with an IAD ≥10mmHg had a change in the arm with the highest blood pressure. The 95 % Limits of Agreement (LoA) for the mean interarm difference for a single measurement was 13.2 mmHg. Conclusion: Microlife WatchBP measurement is a feasible method to determine IAD in a clinical setting. Bilateral BP measurements should be performed at first visit to help the clinician choose the right arm for further BP evaluations.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T06:56:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-66fe4a0923e9427faf75109ce57cd86c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1876-4401
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T06:56:02Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Artery Research
spelling doaj.art-66fe4a0923e9427faf75109ce57cd86c2022-12-22T02:57:15ZengBMCArtery Research1876-44012016-11-011610.1016/j.artres.2016.10.08110.3 USE OF MICROLIFE BP WATCH IS A FEASIBLE APPROACH TO DETERMINE INTER-ARM BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCES IN A CLINICAL SETTINGChristoffer KrogagerEsben LaugesenNiklas B. RossenPer L. PoulsenMogens ErlandsenKlavs W. HansenAim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of Microlife Watch BP for measuring bilateral blood pressure (BP) in a clinical setting. Method: 339 patients (85% diabetic) scheduled for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at the outpatient clinic for endocrinology, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, were examined with simultaneously bilateral BP measurements. A fully automatic, oscillometric device was used and two successive measurements were made. Results: 9,1% of the patients had a clinically significant inter-arm blood pressure difference (IAD) of ≥10mmHg in the first set of measurements. Mean IAD in the first measurement was -0,3mmHg 6.6. Twenty-three patients had a normal IAD in the first set of measurements but IAD ≥10mmHg in the second set of measurements. Only one of the patients with an IAD ≥10mmHg had a change in the arm with the highest blood pressure. The 95 % Limits of Agreement (LoA) for the mean interarm difference for a single measurement was 13.2 mmHg. Conclusion: Microlife WatchBP measurement is a feasible method to determine IAD in a clinical setting. Bilateral BP measurements should be performed at first visit to help the clinician choose the right arm for further BP evaluations.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930461/view
spellingShingle Christoffer Krogager
Esben Laugesen
Niklas B. Rossen
Per L. Poulsen
Mogens Erlandsen
Klavs W. Hansen
10.3 USE OF MICROLIFE BP WATCH IS A FEASIBLE APPROACH TO DETERMINE INTER-ARM BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCES IN A CLINICAL SETTING
Artery Research
title 10.3 USE OF MICROLIFE BP WATCH IS A FEASIBLE APPROACH TO DETERMINE INTER-ARM BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCES IN A CLINICAL SETTING
title_full 10.3 USE OF MICROLIFE BP WATCH IS A FEASIBLE APPROACH TO DETERMINE INTER-ARM BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCES IN A CLINICAL SETTING
title_fullStr 10.3 USE OF MICROLIFE BP WATCH IS A FEASIBLE APPROACH TO DETERMINE INTER-ARM BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCES IN A CLINICAL SETTING
title_full_unstemmed 10.3 USE OF MICROLIFE BP WATCH IS A FEASIBLE APPROACH TO DETERMINE INTER-ARM BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCES IN A CLINICAL SETTING
title_short 10.3 USE OF MICROLIFE BP WATCH IS A FEASIBLE APPROACH TO DETERMINE INTER-ARM BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCES IN A CLINICAL SETTING
title_sort 10 3 use of microlife bp watch is a feasible approach to determine inter arm blood pressure differences in a clinical setting
url https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930461/view
work_keys_str_mv AT christofferkrogager 103useofmicrolifebpwatchisafeasibleapproachtodetermineinterarmbloodpressuredifferencesinaclinicalsetting
AT esbenlaugesen 103useofmicrolifebpwatchisafeasibleapproachtodetermineinterarmbloodpressuredifferencesinaclinicalsetting
AT niklasbrossen 103useofmicrolifebpwatchisafeasibleapproachtodetermineinterarmbloodpressuredifferencesinaclinicalsetting
AT perlpoulsen 103useofmicrolifebpwatchisafeasibleapproachtodetermineinterarmbloodpressuredifferencesinaclinicalsetting
AT mogenserlandsen 103useofmicrolifebpwatchisafeasibleapproachtodetermineinterarmbloodpressuredifferencesinaclinicalsetting
AT klavswhansen 103useofmicrolifebpwatchisafeasibleapproachtodetermineinterarmbloodpressuredifferencesinaclinicalsetting