A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks

Brain network analyses have moved to the forefront of neuroimaging research over the last decade. However, methods for statistically comparing groups of networks have lagged behind. These comparisons have great appeal for researchers interested in gaining further insight into complex brain function...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sean L Simpson, Robert G Lyday, Satoru eHayasaka, Anthony P Marsh, Paul J Laurienti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2013.00171/full
_version_ 1819074382632321024
author Sean L Simpson
Robert G Lyday
Satoru eHayasaka
Anthony P Marsh
Paul J Laurienti
author_facet Sean L Simpson
Robert G Lyday
Satoru eHayasaka
Anthony P Marsh
Paul J Laurienti
author_sort Sean L Simpson
collection DOAJ
description Brain network analyses have moved to the forefront of neuroimaging research over the last decade. However, methods for statistically comparing groups of networks have lagged behind. These comparisons have great appeal for researchers interested in gaining further insight into complex brain function and how it changes across different mental states and disease conditions. Current comparison approaches generally either rely on a summary metric or on mass-univariate nodal or edge-based comparisons that ignore the inherent topological properties of the network, yielding little power and failing to make network level comparisons. Gleaning deeper insights into normal and abnormal changes in complex brain function demands methods that take advantage of the wealth of data present in an entire brain network. Here we propose a permutation testing framework that allows comparing groups of networks while incorporating topological features inherent in each individual network. We validate our approach using simulated data with known group differences. We then apply the method to functional brain networks derived from fMRI data.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T18:08:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-66fee54286bd4761abd636ace0fc901e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5188
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T18:08:38Z
publishDate 2013-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-66fee54286bd4761abd636ace0fc901e2022-12-21T18:54:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience1662-51882013-11-01710.3389/fncom.2013.0017166591A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networksSean L Simpson0Robert G Lyday1Satoru eHayasaka2Anthony P Marsh3Paul J Laurienti4Wake Forest School of MedicineWake Forest School of MedicineWake Forest School of MedicineWake Forest UniversityWake Forest School of MedicineBrain network analyses have moved to the forefront of neuroimaging research over the last decade. However, methods for statistically comparing groups of networks have lagged behind. These comparisons have great appeal for researchers interested in gaining further insight into complex brain function and how it changes across different mental states and disease conditions. Current comparison approaches generally either rely on a summary metric or on mass-univariate nodal or edge-based comparisons that ignore the inherent topological properties of the network, yielding little power and failing to make network level comparisons. Gleaning deeper insights into normal and abnormal changes in complex brain function demands methods that take advantage of the wealth of data present in an entire brain network. Here we propose a permutation testing framework that allows comparing groups of networks while incorporating topological features inherent in each individual network. We validate our approach using simulated data with known group differences. We then apply the method to functional brain networks derived from fMRI data.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2013.00171/fullNeuroimagingconnectivityfMRISmall-worldgraph theoryJaccard
spellingShingle Sean L Simpson
Robert G Lyday
Satoru eHayasaka
Anthony P Marsh
Paul J Laurienti
A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Neuroimaging
connectivity
fMRI
Small-world
graph theory
Jaccard
title A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks
title_full A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks
title_fullStr A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks
title_full_unstemmed A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks
title_short A permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks
title_sort permutation testing framework to compare groups of brain networks
topic Neuroimaging
connectivity
fMRI
Small-world
graph theory
Jaccard
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncom.2013.00171/full
work_keys_str_mv AT seanlsimpson apermutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks
AT robertglyday apermutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks
AT satoruehayasaka apermutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks
AT anthonypmarsh apermutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks
AT pauljlaurienti apermutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks
AT seanlsimpson permutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks
AT robertglyday permutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks
AT satoruehayasaka permutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks
AT anthonypmarsh permutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks
AT pauljlaurienti permutationtestingframeworktocomparegroupsofbrainnetworks