Ayurveda in Knee Osteoarthritis—Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Ayurveda is widely practiced in South Asia in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of these secondary data analyses were to identify the most relevant variables for treatment response and group differences between Ayurvedic therapy compared to conventional therapy in knee OA pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian S. Kessler, Michael Jeitler, Kartar S. Dhiman, Abhimanyu Kumar, Thomas Ostermann, Shivenarain Gupta, Antonio Morandi, Martin Mittwede, Elmar Stapelfeldt, Michaela Spoo, Katja Icke, Andreas Michalsen, Claudia M. Witt, Manfred B. Wischnewsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/11/3047
_version_ 1797492897795276800
author Christian S. Kessler
Michael Jeitler
Kartar S. Dhiman
Abhimanyu Kumar
Thomas Ostermann
Shivenarain Gupta
Antonio Morandi
Martin Mittwede
Elmar Stapelfeldt
Michaela Spoo
Katja Icke
Andreas Michalsen
Claudia M. Witt
Manfred B. Wischnewsky
author_facet Christian S. Kessler
Michael Jeitler
Kartar S. Dhiman
Abhimanyu Kumar
Thomas Ostermann
Shivenarain Gupta
Antonio Morandi
Martin Mittwede
Elmar Stapelfeldt
Michaela Spoo
Katja Icke
Andreas Michalsen
Claudia M. Witt
Manfred B. Wischnewsky
author_sort Christian S. Kessler
collection DOAJ
description Background: Ayurveda is widely practiced in South Asia in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of these secondary data analyses were to identify the most relevant variables for treatment response and group differences between Ayurvedic therapy compared to conventional therapy in knee OA patients. Methods: A total of 151 patients (Ayurveda <i>n</i> = 77, conventional care <i>n</i> = 74) were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle in a randomized controlled trial. Different statistical approaches including generalized linear models, a radial basis function (RBF) network, exhausted CHAID, classification and regression trees (CART), and C5.0 with adaptive boosting were applied. Results: The RBF network implicated that the therapy arm and the baseline values of the WOMAC Index subscales might be the most important variables for the significant between-group differences of the WOMAC Index from baseline to 12 weeks in favor of Ayurveda. The intake of nutritional supplements in the Ayurveda group did not seem to be a significant factor in changes in the WOMAC Index. Ayurveda patients with functional limitations > 60 points and pain > 25 points at baseline showed the greatest improvements in the WOMAC Index from baseline to 12 weeks (mean value 107.8 ± 27.4). A C5.0 model with nine predictors had a predictive accuracy of 89.4% for a change in the WOMAC Index after 12 weeks > 10. With adaptive boosting, the accuracy rose to 98%. Conclusions: These secondary analyses suggested that therapeutic effects cannot be explained by the therapies themselves alone, although they were the most important factors in the applied models.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:12:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6701a98782774a9e8a51351d8ddac3b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:12:12Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-6701a98782774a9e8a51351d8ddac3b92023-11-23T14:15:55ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-05-011111304710.3390/jcm11113047Ayurveda in Knee Osteoarthritis—Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Controlled TrialChristian S. Kessler0Michael Jeitler1Kartar S. Dhiman2Abhimanyu Kumar3Thomas Ostermann4Shivenarain Gupta5Antonio Morandi6Martin Mittwede7Elmar Stapelfeldt8Michaela Spoo9Katja Icke10Andreas Michalsen11Claudia M. Witt12Manfred B. Wischnewsky13Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, GermanyInstitute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, GermanyFaculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, IndiaDr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University, Jodhpur 342037, IndiaDepartment of Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Witten Herdecke, 58455 Witten, GermanyEuropean Academy of Ayurveda, 95018 Birstein, GermanyAyurvedic Point, School of Ayurvedic Medicine, 20149 Milan, ItalyEuropean Academy of Ayurveda, 95018 Birstein, GermanyDepartment for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Immanuel Hospital Berlin, 14109 Berlin, GermanyDepartment for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Immanuel Hospital Berlin, 14109 Berlin, GermanyInstitute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, GermanyInstitute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, GermanyInstitute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, GermanyBackground: Ayurveda is widely practiced in South Asia in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of these secondary data analyses were to identify the most relevant variables for treatment response and group differences between Ayurvedic therapy compared to conventional therapy in knee OA patients. Methods: A total of 151 patients (Ayurveda <i>n</i> = 77, conventional care <i>n</i> = 74) were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle in a randomized controlled trial. Different statistical approaches including generalized linear models, a radial basis function (RBF) network, exhausted CHAID, classification and regression trees (CART), and C5.0 with adaptive boosting were applied. Results: The RBF network implicated that the therapy arm and the baseline values of the WOMAC Index subscales might be the most important variables for the significant between-group differences of the WOMAC Index from baseline to 12 weeks in favor of Ayurveda. The intake of nutritional supplements in the Ayurveda group did not seem to be a significant factor in changes in the WOMAC Index. Ayurveda patients with functional limitations > 60 points and pain > 25 points at baseline showed the greatest improvements in the WOMAC Index from baseline to 12 weeks (mean value 107.8 ± 27.4). A C5.0 model with nine predictors had a predictive accuracy of 89.4% for a change in the WOMAC Index after 12 weeks > 10. With adaptive boosting, the accuracy rose to 98%. Conclusions: These secondary analyses suggested that therapeutic effects cannot be explained by the therapies themselves alone, although they were the most important factors in the applied models.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/11/3047Ayurvedatraditional Indian medicineknee osteoarthritiscomplementary medicineintegrative medicine
spellingShingle Christian S. Kessler
Michael Jeitler
Kartar S. Dhiman
Abhimanyu Kumar
Thomas Ostermann
Shivenarain Gupta
Antonio Morandi
Martin Mittwede
Elmar Stapelfeldt
Michaela Spoo
Katja Icke
Andreas Michalsen
Claudia M. Witt
Manfred B. Wischnewsky
Ayurveda in Knee Osteoarthritis—Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Ayurveda
traditional Indian medicine
knee osteoarthritis
complementary medicine
integrative medicine
title Ayurveda in Knee Osteoarthritis—Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Ayurveda in Knee Osteoarthritis—Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Ayurveda in Knee Osteoarthritis—Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Ayurveda in Knee Osteoarthritis—Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Ayurveda in Knee Osteoarthritis—Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort ayurveda in knee osteoarthritis secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial
topic Ayurveda
traditional Indian medicine
knee osteoarthritis
complementary medicine
integrative medicine
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/11/3047
work_keys_str_mv AT christianskessler ayurvedainkneeosteoarthritissecondaryanalysesofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT michaeljeitler ayurvedainkneeosteoarthritissecondaryanalysesofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kartarsdhiman ayurvedainkneeosteoarthritissecondaryanalysesofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT abhimanyukumar ayurvedainkneeosteoarthritissecondaryanalysesofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thomasostermann ayurvedainkneeosteoarthritissecondaryanalysesofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shivenaraingupta ayurvedainkneeosteoarthritissecondaryanalysesofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT antoniomorandi ayurvedainkneeosteoarthritissecondaryanalysesofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT martinmittwede ayurvedainkneeosteoarthritissecondaryanalysesofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elmarstapelfeldt ayurvedainkneeosteoarthritissecondaryanalysesofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT michaelaspoo ayurvedainkneeosteoarthritissecondaryanalysesofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT katjaicke ayurvedainkneeosteoarthritissecondaryanalysesofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT andreasmichalsen ayurvedainkneeosteoarthritissecondaryanalysesofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT claudiamwitt ayurvedainkneeosteoarthritissecondaryanalysesofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT manfredbwischnewsky ayurvedainkneeosteoarthritissecondaryanalysesofarandomizedcontrolledtrial