Yes, we have an inflation of reviews: but of the wrong kind!

Yes, we have an inflation of reviews: but of the wrong kind!

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	David Gordon Robinson
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-04-01
Series:	Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:	scientific writing Review articles Critical reviews catalogue reviews open debates
Online Access:	http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2016.00494/full

Similar Items

The Viewpoints of Alborz University of Medical Sciences’ Faculty Members on Open Peer Review of Journal Articles
by: Sirous Panahi, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

The role of peer review on the improvement of the articles published in the Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences
by: Hossein Beydokhti, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01)

We have an inflation of review papers – for what are reviews good?
by: Ingo eSchubert
Published: (2016-02-01)

Přehledové studie: jejich typologie, funkce a způsob vytváření. / Reviews: Their typology, functions and how to write them.
by: Jiří Mareš
Published: (2013-08-01)

Halo Effect in Peer Review: Exploring the Possibility of Bias Associated with the Feeling of Belonging to a Group
by: José Osvaldo De Sordi, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

Book Review: Método lógico para Redação Científica, by Gilson Volpato
by: LINDEN, R.
Published: (2011-06-01)

Book review: Metodologia de Pesquisa em Ciência da Computaçao by Raul Sidnei Wazlawick
by: LINDEN, R.
Published: (2010-12-01)

Effectiveness of core stability exercise for knee joint osteoarthritis: A review
by: Muhammad Deyu Wisnubrata, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Pitfalls in scientific research: critical appraisal of articles published in one of the international journals in Egypt
by: Sarah S. Nasr, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Instability, complications, and functional outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty and anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for chronic neglected shoulder dislocation: a systematic review
by: Dipit Sahu, MS, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

is the brain a computer
by: hussain rustam
Published: (2006-01-01)

Obesity and resistin'. What is the link?
by: hedef D. El-Yassin
Published: (2005-07-01)

hodgkin's diseases An- update
by: nabeel W. Rasheed
Published: (2006-01-01)

The Chinese Military and Technological Puzzle
by: John Frankenstein
Published: (2005-08-01)

Chairman Mao, the Chinese Revolution, and the Banality of Evil: Reflections on the State of the Field in Mao Studies
by: Søren Clausen
Published: (2005-04-01)

The Chinese Military and Technological Puzzle
by: John Frankenstein
Published: (2005-08-01)

Chairman Mao, the Chinese Revolution, and the Banality of Evil: Reflections on the State of the Field in Mao Studies
by: Søren Clausen
Published: (2005-04-01)

Biologics in shoulder and elbow pathology
by: Eric D. Haunschild, BS, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Open peer review: some considerations on the selection and management of reviewers
by: Andrea Capaccioni
Published: (2022-12-01)

Review process of the health scientific journals according to explanation of experts
by: Hasan Ashrafi-Rizi, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Revealing Reviewers’ Identities as Part of Open Peer Review and Analysis of the Review Reports
by: Cezary Bolek, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)

Testes psicológicos: análise da produção científica brasileira no período 2000-2004
by: Marcilio Lira de Souza Filho, et al.

CRITERIA FOR TEXT CONFORMITY TO SCIENTIFIC STYLE
by: E. I. Blees, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

List of reviewers of articles in ZTR in 2023
Published: (2023-12-01)

Mark Galeotti: We Need to Talk about Putin: How the West Gets Him Wrong
by: Syrovátka, Jonáš
Published: (2021-02-01)

Where do we aspire to publish? A position paper on scientific communication in biochemistry and molecular biology
by: M.S. Baptista, et al.

Scientific Publication Article Development Training for SMK Teachers
by: Rida Prihatni, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

Interactive Open Access Publishing and Peer Review: The Effectiveness and Perspectives of Transparency and Self-Regulation in Scientific Communication and Evaluation
by: Ulrich Poschl
Published: (2010-02-01)

A Critical Look at the Practice of Literature Review
by: Marcelo de Souza Bispo
Published: (2023-11-01)

SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles
by: Christopher Baethge, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Scientific and Publishing Activities of National Libraries of Poland
by: Dubas Tetiana
Published: (2023-01-01)

The Need for a Sustainable and Balanced Critical Approach in Book Reviews
by: Demir Cuneyt
Published: (2019-06-01)

EASYVERIFIER 1.0: Herramienta de software para revisar citaciones bibliográficas en artículos científicos
by: Freddy Alberto Correa Riveros, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01)

Making the most of peer review
by: Nikolai Slavov
Published: (2015-11-01)

How to Write and Publish a Scientific Article?
by: Mahmut Taha Ölçücü, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

Systematic Reviews of the Literature Are Not Always Either Useful Or the Best Way To Add To Science
by: Janet T. Powell, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Treatment in transient synovitis cases: A review
by: Panji - Sananta, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Scientific peer review in the modern era: A comprehensive guide
by: Nimrat Kaur Sandhu, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Rezension zu: Catalogue 2.0 : the future of the libary catalogue / ed. by Sally Chambers. London: Facet Publ., 2013. XXVII, 212 S., graph. Darst. ISBN 978-1-85604-716-6
by: Petra Hauke
Published: (2013-10-01)

African primary care research: Reviewing the literature
by: Andrew Ross, et al.
Published: (2014-02-01)