Formation techniques for upper active channel in monolithic 3D integration: an overview

Abstract The concept of three-dimensional stacking of device layers has attracted significant attention with the increasing difficulty in scaling down devices. Monolithic 3D (M3D) integration provides a notable benefit in achieving a higher connection density between upper and lower device layers th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: An Hoang-Thuy Nguyen, Manh-Cuong Nguyen, Anh-Duy Nguyen, Seung Joon Jeon, Noh-Hwal Park, Jeong-Hwan Lee, Rino Choi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2024-01-01
Series:Nano Convergence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-023-00411-4
_version_ 1827326514396397568
author An Hoang-Thuy Nguyen
Manh-Cuong Nguyen
Anh-Duy Nguyen
Seung Joon Jeon
Noh-Hwal Park
Jeong-Hwan Lee
Rino Choi
author_facet An Hoang-Thuy Nguyen
Manh-Cuong Nguyen
Anh-Duy Nguyen
Seung Joon Jeon
Noh-Hwal Park
Jeong-Hwan Lee
Rino Choi
author_sort An Hoang-Thuy Nguyen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The concept of three-dimensional stacking of device layers has attracted significant attention with the increasing difficulty in scaling down devices. Monolithic 3D (M3D) integration provides a notable benefit in achieving a higher connection density between upper and lower device layers than through-via-silicon. Nevertheless, the practical implementation of M3D integration into commercial production faces several technological challenges. Developing an upper active channel layer for device fabrication is the primary challenge in M3D integration. The difficulty arises from the thermal budget limitation for the upper channel process because a high thermal budget process may degrade the device layers below. This paper provides an overview of the potential technologies for forming active channel layers in the upper device layers of M3D integration, particularly for complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor devices and digital circuits. Techniques are for polysilicon, single crystal silicon, and alternative channels, which can solve the temperature issue for the top layer process.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:46:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6715487770bd4c1ca5eef38c9a8113e2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-5404
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:46:41Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Nano Convergence
spelling doaj.art-6715487770bd4c1ca5eef38c9a8113e22024-03-05T19:56:35ZengSpringerOpenNano Convergence2196-54042024-01-0111111510.1186/s40580-023-00411-4Formation techniques for upper active channel in monolithic 3D integration: an overviewAn Hoang-Thuy Nguyen0Manh-Cuong Nguyen1Anh-Duy Nguyen2Seung Joon Jeon3Noh-Hwal Park4Jeong-Hwan Lee5Rino Choi63D Convergence Center at Inha University3D Convergence Center at Inha UniversityDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Inha University3D Convergence Center at Inha University3D Convergence Center at Inha University3D Convergence Center at Inha University3D Convergence Center at Inha UniversityAbstract The concept of three-dimensional stacking of device layers has attracted significant attention with the increasing difficulty in scaling down devices. Monolithic 3D (M3D) integration provides a notable benefit in achieving a higher connection density between upper and lower device layers than through-via-silicon. Nevertheless, the practical implementation of M3D integration into commercial production faces several technological challenges. Developing an upper active channel layer for device fabrication is the primary challenge in M3D integration. The difficulty arises from the thermal budget limitation for the upper channel process because a high thermal budget process may degrade the device layers below. This paper provides an overview of the potential technologies for forming active channel layers in the upper device layers of M3D integration, particularly for complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor devices and digital circuits. Techniques are for polysilicon, single crystal silicon, and alternative channels, which can solve the temperature issue for the top layer process.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-023-00411-4Monolithic 3DThermal budget limitationUpper layerTechniques
spellingShingle An Hoang-Thuy Nguyen
Manh-Cuong Nguyen
Anh-Duy Nguyen
Seung Joon Jeon
Noh-Hwal Park
Jeong-Hwan Lee
Rino Choi
Formation techniques for upper active channel in monolithic 3D integration: an overview
Nano Convergence
Monolithic 3D
Thermal budget limitation
Upper layer
Techniques
title Formation techniques for upper active channel in monolithic 3D integration: an overview
title_full Formation techniques for upper active channel in monolithic 3D integration: an overview
title_fullStr Formation techniques for upper active channel in monolithic 3D integration: an overview
title_full_unstemmed Formation techniques for upper active channel in monolithic 3D integration: an overview
title_short Formation techniques for upper active channel in monolithic 3D integration: an overview
title_sort formation techniques for upper active channel in monolithic 3d integration an overview
topic Monolithic 3D
Thermal budget limitation
Upper layer
Techniques
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-023-00411-4
work_keys_str_mv AT anhoangthuynguyen formationtechniquesforupperactivechannelinmonolithic3dintegrationanoverview
AT manhcuongnguyen formationtechniquesforupperactivechannelinmonolithic3dintegrationanoverview
AT anhduynguyen formationtechniquesforupperactivechannelinmonolithic3dintegrationanoverview
AT seungjoonjeon formationtechniquesforupperactivechannelinmonolithic3dintegrationanoverview
AT nohhwalpark formationtechniquesforupperactivechannelinmonolithic3dintegrationanoverview
AT jeonghwanlee formationtechniquesforupperactivechannelinmonolithic3dintegrationanoverview
AT rinochoi formationtechniquesforupperactivechannelinmonolithic3dintegrationanoverview